1. Rev 6.1

3.  Lack of collaboration is a major risk  Late engagement is a risk  How much is new?  How much time?  How many resources?  Design Collaboration  Process Collaboration Rev 6.1

4. Structured collaboration involving Engineering, Manufacturing, Material Control, Purchasing, Quality, Sales and Management from both Polaris and the Supplier INPUT! Rev 6.1

5. Advanced Product Quality Planning is a structured method of defining and establishing the steps necessary to assure that a product satisfies the customer Sometimes Referred to as Moving the Mountain Rev 6.1

6. The AIAG Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) and Control Plan Reference Manual [available at aiag.org] provides the general guidelines for ensuring that APQP is implemented in accordance with the requirements of the customer. The APQP spreadsheet used by Polaris includes the corresponding page number referencing each of the APQP steps for quick orientation. Rev 6.1

7. The APQP/PDP Spreadsheet acts as both a workbook and project tracker Relevant product information is entered Cross functional teams are established Individual tasks are selected and assigned Time lines are managed by date, responsibility, and percent of completion Documentation relative to the project is stored Overall APQP/PDP performance/progress is reported Here is where progress is recorded and stored Rev 6.1

8. Risk is determined by several factors: Time to resource New product New supplier Design risks Safety critical Technically complex Supplier assessment score Supplier performance (history) The Polaris Risk Assessment considers the factors and selects whether the APQP/PDP workbook will be level 1, 2 or 3 Each level will have a minimum number of APQP steps assigned required to be completed by both Polaris and the Supplier There are 63 possible steps to select on the APQP/PDP spreadsheet. These steps are selected by all or part of both cross functional teams. Based on project risk, Polaris has 3 levels of APQP/PDP with minimum required steps preselected. Rev 6.1

9. Level 1 – Low Risk 21 Mandatory APQP Steps Selected Level 2 – Medium Risk 28 Mandatory APQP Steps Selected Level 3 – High Risk 39 Mandatory APQP Steps Selected These are minimum APQP requirements as determined by Polaris, other value added APQP steps may be selected by the Supplier/Polaris cross functional teams When saving APQP/PDP workbooks please use the naming convention of: project name_supplier_part number Rev 6.1

12. There are 5 PDP Gates/Milestones total Rev 6.1

13. The tabs at the bottom of the workbook are hyperlinked to the steps on the APQP sheet Information on APQP and sometimes sample forms are located on these tabs The tabs should also be used to convey information related to the selected step Rev 6.1

14. The tabs at the bottom of the workbook are hyperlinked to the steps on the APQP sheet Information on APQP and sometimes sample forms are located on these tabs The tabs should also be used to convey information related to the selected step Marked up drawings for 2.2 DFM&A, completed 2.13 MFC, completed Packaging Approval Form are a few examples of items which should be attached to the workbook Larger items such as PFMEAs and Control Plans we ask that upon completion the first page of the document be placed on the corresponding tab and the full copy sent to the SQE for review Rev 6.1

15. PDP Status Tab of Workbook Provides a Snapshot of PDP Progress by the Supplier Populated from APQP Spreadsheet Rev 6.1

16. Data Derived from the Supplier PDP Status is Used to Report Overall PDP Project Status Across Multiple Suppliers Rev 6.1

17. SQE’s issue the APQP/PDP Workbook to our Suppliers. When the Supplier utilizes the Workbook Project PDP reporting is automatically reported by Supplier and by Project to our Management Group. The APQP Spreadsheet acts as both a workbook and project tracker Relevant product information is entered Cross functional teams are established Individual tasks are selected and assigned Time lines are managed by date, responsibility, and percent of completion Documentation relative to the project is stored Overall APQP performance/progress is reported Rev 6.1