Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension."— Presentation transcript:

1 As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension

2 To Hit a Target (Complete a Project) You Need a Blueprint

3 “Ideal” Carcass Specifications  Hot Carcass Weight 700 to 800 lb  External fat 0.3” to 0.4”  Loin Eye Area 12.0 to 14.0 sq. in.  Marbling Small 00 minimum – Modest 00 preferred  Genetically “Guaranteed Tender”

4 Goals Set for 2005 from National Beef Quality Audit - 2000  Eliminate USDA Standard grade carcasses.  Eliminate Yield Grade 4’s and 5’s.  Eliminate side-branded hides.  Accompany all seedstock animals with meaningful genetic data for production and end-product traits.  Continually improve the eating quality of beef.

5 Defining Quality  Consumer – Affordable, lean, tasty, and tender  Retailer – Trim, tasty, uniform in size and tender  Packer – Finished cattle of the proper weight, quality grade and yield  Feeder – “Good Doing” cattle w/ growth potential, the right weight, quality and yield  Producer – Genetically correct cattle, efficient in reproduction, growth, and adequate marbling

6 Producers’ Tool Box  Genetics  Nutrition  Management  Advertisement/Education

7 Heritability Estimates  Fat thickness 0.19  Marbling Score 0.68  WBSF 0.40  Taste Sensory Panel Tenderness 0.37 Juiciness 0.46 Flavor 0.07 Dikeman et al., submitted

8 Marbling, Favor, Juiciness, and Tenderness  Breed composition  Diet energy concentration  Length of the finishing phase

9 Breed Differences Exist Black is not a Carcass Gene, It is a Dominant Coat Color Gene.

10 Why Do We Need Marbling?  Flavor  Insurance for Ignorance in Cooking

11 Marbling (Producers’ Insurance Policy)  About a 10% linear increase in consumer acceptance for each full marble score between Slight and Slightly Abundant.  WBSF between 6.6 and 12.1 correlated to a steep decline in predicted acceptance. Platter et al., 2003 CSU

12 USDA Grade and Endpoint Temperature Obuz et al., 2004, KSU

13 Relationship between Cow Production & Carcass Traits WeightHeightCondition Score HCWt0.810.690.23 Retail Prod.-0.050.03-0.12 LMA0.340.320.24 Marbling-0.15-0.17-0.03 WBSF0.150.220.08 Nephawe et al., 2004 MARC

14 A positive correlation exists between Marbling and Milk EPDs. Marston, 2004

15 Tenderness  Injection Site (up to 6” of injection)  Castration  Over Aggressive Implant Programs

16 Beef Palatability & Genetics Breed/SireWBSF Marbling Simmental-0.90 to +0.79-0.22 to +0.48 Shorthorn-0.90 to +0.79-0.42 to 0.00 Herefords-0.1.06 to +0..44-0.16 to +0.47 WBSF and Marbling: Lowly correlated –0.19 Carcass Merit Traits Project

17 DNA Marker Assisted Selection  Eating Quality Test  Disease Resistance  Marker–Assisted Expected Progeny Differences  Global Efforts – Australia, Brazil, Canada  Calpain (good guy) propagate and  Calpastatin (bad guy) eliminate

18

19 Nutrition  Grain vs. Grass-fed vs. Forage-fed  Weaning Age/Young Age Positive Energy Balance  Propionate vs. Acetate VFA Rumen Production  Creep feeding

20 Management  Implant and Implant Programs  Feed Additives (Beta agonists)  Calf vs. Aged Cattle Feeding  Days on Feed

21 Effects of Days Fed May et al., OSU

22 Sickness Robs Quality Grade

23 Treating for Sickness Can Influence Quality Grade No. of treatments 012 or more No. calves5,490574540 Quality score6.456.65*6.87** Prime, %1.861.050.93 Prem. Choice, %27.1*24.28*†18.7† Total Choice, %70.762.958.0 Standard, %2.65.910.6 Busby et al., 2004 ISU

24 Promotion, Development, and Education

25 Using the Tools in the Box Measure Twice – Cut Once

26 Three Paradigms of Beef Producers  Cattle Producer Labor user, task-driven, no effective use of information  Red Meat Producer Record keeper, cost efficient, focused on red meat  Food Producer Complex, targeting product characteristics which are multi-dimensional and directly related to known tastes and preferences of consumers

27 The Future of the Paradigms  Cattle Producer – will be around because of the love and romance of the business, will stay in business if not over leveraged.  Red Meat Producer – will survive with the commodity side of the business.  Food Producer – will be rewarded by those that know the value of quality. Driven by the cost and quality controlled production of food made from beef.

28 Quality Thoughts  We can now make more mistakes faster than ever before.  Those who refuse to use data will make greater and more frequent mistakes.  Those who refuse to make data will be compensated with a smaller piece of the pie.  Those who control the data control the destiny of the industry.


Download ppt "As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google