Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Research Executive Agency Virginia PUZZOLO Stijn VERMOOTE REA Unit S2- Space Research FP7 scoping and guiding rules Kick-off Meeting EURO4M De Bilt (the.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Research Executive Agency Virginia PUZZOLO Stijn VERMOOTE REA Unit S2- Space Research FP7 scoping and guiding rules Kick-off Meeting EURO4M De Bilt (the."— Presentation transcript:

1 Research Executive Agency Virginia PUZZOLO Stijn VERMOOTE REA Unit S2- Space Research FP7 scoping and guiding rules Kick-off Meeting EURO4M De Bilt (the Netherlands) – April 2010

2 Outline of the presentation 1.Role of the Research Executive Agency 2.FP7 Space Programme 3.Selection of EURO4M for funding 4.Grant agreement 5.Information on project management Kick-Off EURO4M – 14/04/2010 – Virginia PUZZOLO

3 1. Role of the Research Executive Agency

4 Commission Decision EC/2008/46 of 14 December 2007 Autonomy since 15 June 2009 Total budget managed: about 6.5 billion Lifetime: 2008 – 2017 Lifetime of FP7 (to 2013), then a run down to 2017 of projects under management Reviewed every three years Potential to extend after FP7 Research Executive Agency

5 REA major activities The REA directly implements some actions: –SME-specific actions (Capacities); –Marie Curie actions (People); –Security and Space actions (Cooperation). The REA provides horizontal services across all programmes: –Run the evaluation facility (reception of proposal and support to evaluation); –Provide administrative services registration of beneficiaries (central validation); –Run a central FP7 enquiry service.

6 Unit Space research - Main Tasks Policy work remains within the Commission – this includes the definition of the space work programme (EC DG ENTR) FP7 Implementation by the Space Research Unit: The REA is in charge of: (1) organising the evaluation of proposals (2) negotiation of proposals (3) technical and financial management of projects Except specific topics identified by DG ENTR in the work programme (e.g. development of the Space component of GMES)

7 Space Research Unit - people NAMEFUNCTION BERNOT ChristineHead of Unit PETRE OlivierHead of Sector – Financial Department BISCH AnthonyProject Officer CHIARINI PaolaProject Officer DE OLIVEIRA JANEIRO VascoProject Officer MOTA ALVES PaulaProject Officer PUZZOLO VirginiaProject Officer STEINER RenéProject Officer VERMOOTE StijnProject Officer RANDISI MariaSecretary HoU MÖNNIGHOFF MichaelSecretary PASTOR RUBIO CelinaSecretary RICHARD VanessaSecretary BRUNET COMPANY XiscaLegal Officer D'ORILIA StefanoLegal/Financial Officer

8 2. FP7 Space Programme

9 FP7-Space (Theme 9) 9.3. Cross-cutting activities Developing satellite observation systems and the GMES services for the management of the environment, security, agriculture, forestry and meteorology, civil protection and risk management Support research for long term needs such as space transportation, bio-medicine, life and physical sciences in space Space-based application at the service of the European Society 9.2. Strengthening the foundations of Space science and technology SME relevant research, International cooperation, cross-thematic approaches, dissemination actions, European Space Policy implementation actions

10 FP7 Space Research budget Total Space budget 1.43 Billions Space budget managed by the REA –1st call ( ) 134 Millions –2 nd call (2009) 53 Millions –3rd call (2010) 114 Millions Then about 100 Millions/year Thus globally about 600 Millions (about 400 for GMES and 200 for SSF)

11 Call 1: FP7 SPACE 2007 / GMES topics Topic Existing Fast Track Services (GMES Core Services): –Emergency reponse: SAFER –Land Monitoring: GEOLAND2 –Marine: MyOcean Topic New GMES Core Services: –Atmospheric Composition and Dynamics: MACC –Information Services for Security related activities: G-MOSAIC

12 Call 2: SPACE / GMES topics EURO4M (start 01/04/2010; 48 months; 9 participants; EC contribution EUR 3,989,200.00): European Reanalysis and Observation for Monitoring MONARCH-A (start 01/03/2010; 36 months; 8 participants; EC contribution EUR2,884,484.00): High latitude Climate Change Monitoring; CARBONES (start 01/04/2010; 36 months; 14 participants; EC contribution EUR 2,561,699.00): 30-year re-analysis of Carbon Fluxes and pools over Europe and the Globe.

13 Call 3: SPACE / GMES topics Current status: Central Evaluations and Panel Reviews finished end of February 2010

14 Learn more about Space Research projects funded under FP7 Please visit space/research/index_en.htm Updated brochure including projects from Call 2009 expected soon

15 3. Selection of EURO4M for funding

16 Selection of EURO4M for funding Call FP7-SPACE Launched on 3 September 2008 Topic: SPA Monitoring of climate change issues (extending core service activities); CP, 5MEUR Deadline for proposals4 December 2008 EvaluationFebruary projects selected for funding for topic : MONARCH-A; CARBONES & EURO4M Invitation to negotiate17 July 2009 End of negotiationsEnd January 2010 Production of Grant Agreement Beginning February 2010; GA signed March 2010 Start project: 1 April 2010

17 Main expected impacts from EURO-4M Projects will be expected to contribute to establishing a data archive of systematic observation data related to the climate system, for a continuous record of essential climate variables coherent with UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) requirements. Projects will be expected to contribute to the consistency of such a dataset, as well as to a sustainable and transparent access to such data for global climate scientific and operational communities. Projects will be also expected to improve the structure and coordination of the entities involved in the processing and delivery of climate change relevant dataset, in order to avoid dispersion and duplication of activities and to pave the way for a sustainable provision compliant with the requirements of climate analysis communities. Recall of the expected impact as specified in Call SPACE

18 Main expected impacts from EURO4M As indicated in the Evaluation Summary Report and included in the final DoW, it is, amongst others, important to pay attention to: 1.Ensure that the data and the products of the project will be made available to the public without restriction: web base data portal, the main datasets will be secured for at least 5 yr after the project ends; 2.Links between EURO4M and other parties for data requirements from other projects and activities: EEA, ECMWF and EUMETNET (linked as third party making resource available for free), GMES core service products (not yet foreseen), other baseline datasets including the ESA EO data products; 3.Links with the other GMES Climate change projects and ESA project funded under the ESA Climate Change initiative Be pro-active: in case of problems/questions do not hesitate to contact the REA Project Officer (Stijn Vermoote).

19 4. Grant agreement

20 Grant agreement: Core text + Annexes Annex IDescription of Work (DoW) IIGeneral conditions IIIRelated to specific funding types IVForm A Accession to the grant agreement Each partner signs 3 copies of Form A coordinator Once signed by the coordinator: 1 copy retained by coordinator, 1 copy sent back to beneficiary, 1 copy sent to the REA The coordinator shall send to the REA one signed Form A per beneficiary at the latest 45 calendar days after the entry into force of the grant agreement VForm B Request for accession of a new beneficiary to the Grant Agreement Termination also possible (see Annex II – General conditions) VIForm C Financial statement submitted by each beneficiary at the end of the reporting period To be submitted via SESAM (FORCE) at month 12, 24, 36, 48. All partners should read these!

21 Grant agreement: Core text + annexes Annex VIIForms DCertificate on the financial statements The certificate shall be submitted for claims of payments when the amount of the EC financial contribution claimed by a beneficiary as a reimbursement of costs is equal to or exceeds , when cumulated with all previous payments for which the certificate has not been submitted Verified as factual by an external auditor Public bodies, secondary and higher education establishments and research organisations may opt for a competent public officer to provide their certificate on the financial statements and on the methodology. Forms ECertificate of the methodology Optional, suitable especially for beneficiaries with multiple participations in FP7 Beneficiary may request to opt for this certificate on the methodology for the calculation of costs, which it uses to prepare its cost claims with regard to both personnel and indirect costs This certificate must be forwarded in the form of a detailed description verified as factual by its external auditor When this certificate is accepted, the requirement to provide certificates on the financial statements for claims of interim payments shall be waived Details and advantages explained in 'Guidance Notes on Audit Certification ' ( )

22 Prefinancing/Guarantee Fund Prefinancing: Usually 160% of the average EC contribution amount per reporting period; GA EURO4M: 1,595, EUR (paid to the coordinator within 45 days following the date of entry into force of the grant agreement). Guarantee Fund: 5% of EC contribution; GA EURO4M: 199, EUR No collective financial responsibility in FP7 as was the case in FP6 (still collective scientific responsibility) At the final payment, the amount contributed to the Fund shall be returned to the beneficiaries via the coordinator

23 5. Project management

24 Reporting During the course of EURO-4M, the consortium should submit: The deliverables identified in Description of Work of the Grant Agreement, according to the timetable specified in the Deliverables list (p39-44 of DoW) A periodic report within 60 days of the end of each reporting period (including the last reporting period) EURO-4M: Months 12, 24, 36, 48

25 Periodic report 1.An overview, including a publishable summary, of the progress of work towards the objectives of the project, including achievements and attainment of milestones and deliverables identified in the Description of Work; 2.An explanation of the use of the resources; 3.A Financial Statement (Form C) from each beneficiary + summary financial report for all beneficiaries together; Financial statements should be accompanied by certificates (Form D), when appropriate. Additonal information see: reporting_en.pdf

26 Final reporting At the end of the project you should submit: A final report, within 60 days after the end of the project, comprising: -A final publishable summary report covering results, conclusions and socio-economic impact of the project; -A report covering the wider societal implications of the project, in the form of a questionnaire (gender equality actions, ethical issues, etc.) After receiving final EC payment, the coordinator shall submit a report on the distribution of the Community financial contribution between beneficiaries. To be submitted 30 days after receipt of the final payment.

27 Submission of reports Register in ECAS (Commissions Authentication Service): Once access granted, log in and submit documents via SESAM What information should be submitted: 1.Deliverables 2.Publications 3.Patents (if relevant) 4.Periodic and final reports Additonal information on SESAM see:

28 Submission of financial statements Financial Statements (FORM C) are sumitted via FORCE –FORCE is a web based tool to edit and submit Forms C –Use your ECAS registration to enter FORCE ( Further information see:

29 Approval of reports After reception of the reports the REA may: Approve the reports and deliverables: REA disburses the corresponding payments within 105 days of their receipt unless the time-limit, the payment or the project has been suspended; Suspend the time limit if reports/deliverables have not been supplied, are incomplete, unclear or raise doubts concerning the eligibility of costs claimed. Suspend the payment at any time for the amount intended for the beneficiary(ies) concerned: for details see Article II.5 of Annex II (General conditions) to the grant agreement; Reject the reports and deliverables by giving an appropriate justification and, if appropriate, start the procedure for termination of the GA.

30 Technical Project Reviews / Audits The REA may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project: –At month 12, 24, 36 and 48: back-to-back with annual meetings Independent experts are appointed as reviewers: –give external advice to the REA on the project for the period concerned –assist the REA by recommending any reorientation that may be required.

31 Technical Project Reviews/Audits The reviewers assess, among others: –the degree of fulfilment of the project work plan and of the related deliverables; –the continued relevance of the objectives; –the resources planned and utilised in relation to the achieved progress; –the management procedures and methods of the project; –the beneficiaries contributions and integration within the project etc. The COO will be informed on the outcome of the review report (submitted via SESAM) Templates for review report:

32 Financial audits The Commission/REA may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission/REA services themselves including European Anti-Fraud Office OLAF. The beneficiaries shall keep the originals or, in exceptional cases, duly authenticated copies – including electronic copies - of all documents relating to the grant agreement for up to five years from the end of the project

33 Request for Amendments An amendment to a grant agreement (GA) is a legal act modifying the commitments initially accepted by the parties and which may create new rights or impose new obligations on them, or modifying significant parts of the GA. It allows the parties to modify the GA during its lifetime. When does the GA need to be amended by an Amendment Request? When is an Information Letter sufficient? See:

34 Budgetary transfers: Beneficiaries are allowed to transfer budget between different activities and between themselves in so far as the work is carried out as foreseen in Description of Work

35 Publications and publicity The beneficiaries shall, throughout the duration of the project, take appropriate measures to engage with the public and the media about the project and to highlight the EC financial support. Any publicity, including at a conference or seminar or any type of information or promotional material must specify that the project has received EC research funding and display the European emblem. Any publicity made by the beneficiaries in respect of the project must specify that it reflects only the authors views and that the Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

36 Publications and publicity All publications shall include the following statement: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme ([FP7/ ]) under grant agreement n° (see Article II.30. of the Grant Agreement). During and after the project, the coordinator shall provide references and an abstract of all scientific publications relating to foreground at the latest two months following publication (see Article II.30. of the Grant Agreement). As part of the final project report, the coordinator will be required to submit a full list of publications relating to foreground of the project.

37 Virginia PUZZOLO / Stijn VERMOOTE REA – Research Executive Agency COV2 17/ Brussels Belgium site 16 Place Rogier 1210 Brussels Copyright © Close Comfort Thank you for your attention ! We wish the EURO-4M consortium a fruitful cooperation

Download ppt "Research Executive Agency Virginia PUZZOLO Stijn VERMOOTE REA Unit S2- Space Research FP7 scoping and guiding rules Kick-off Meeting EURO4M De Bilt (the."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google