Presentation on theme: "Cheating In Soccer: Team culture, player behaviour or just a question of circumstance? Chris Stride Malcolm Patterson Ffion Thomas University of Sheffield."— Presentation transcript:
Cheating In Soccer: Team culture, player behaviour or just a question of circumstance? Chris Stride Malcolm Patterson Ffion Thomas University of Sheffield UK
Cheating in professional soccer generates heightened emotions and meanings… The Football Association of Ireland (FAI) lodged a formal complaint with FIFA and demanded that their controversial World Cup play-off defeat by France last night should be replayed. The FAI acted after Irish justice minister Dermot Ahern urged them to make an official protest following the 2-1 aggregate defeat.Football Association of IrelandFIFAFrance He said: If that result remains, it reinforces the view that if you cheat you will win. Why and when do professional soccer players engage in cheating behaviours?
Study Outline Classifying types of cheating within soccer. Counting the occurrences of each type of cheating within a soccer tournament likely to feature varying levels of a range of player, team and match characteristics. Investigating whether the amount of cheating of different types varies by player, team and match. Investigating whether and if so which characteristics of players, teams or matches explain this variation.
What is Cheating? Cheating is… to act fraudulently, to deceive, swindle, or flout rules designed to maintain conditions of fairness. Cashmore (2000) In the context of sport… The rules of football and chess… do not just regulate playing football and chess, but create the very possibility of playing such games. Searle (1969)
What is Cheating? Sports are effectively governed by their ethos, which takes on the constitutive function: Shared set of norms for the interpretation of key constitutive rules (DAgostino, 1981). Sharing norms does not imply perfect agreement: Soccer players may differ on perceived morality of professional foul. Every sport competition can be seen as a verbal and embodied discourse in which shared norms for the interpretation of the rules are challenged, negotiated and adjusted. (Loland et al, 2000)
What is Cheating? Cheating (intentional ethos violation) was classified by Loland (2005): Classic cheating: involves deceit, can have single or multiple advantageous consequences. A subtype is simulation or play-acting, which typically has multiple advantageous consequences. Tactical / professional fouls; deceit plays no part. Penalty accepted, long-term benefit. Arguably a rule violation but not an ethos violation in soccer? We implemented Lolands typology in the context of soccer.
A Typology of Cheating within Soccer Classic Cheating: Simulation or play-acting, typically multiple advantageous consequences. Simulation of being fouled (i.e. diving) inside the penalty area. Simulation of being fouled (i.e. diving) outside of the penalty area. Exaggerating an injury received from a foul tackle to get opponent punished. Simulation of being assaulted. Time-wasting by faking or exaggerating the severity of an injury.
A Typology of Cheating within Soccer Classic Cheating: single consequence. Deliberate handball to score goal. Deliberate handball to progress attack. Attempting to 'steal' extra yards or more at a free kick, encroachment by attacking side at a penalty kick.
A Typology of Cheating within Soccer Tactical or professional fouls: Fouling Fouling a player to prevent clear goal scoring opportunity. Fouling a player to prevent an attack continuing. Tactical or professional fouls: Handball Deliberate handball to prevent goal. Deliberate handball to prevent attack continuing, but not yet clear goal scoring opportunity.
A Typology of Cheating within Soccer Tactical or professional fouls: Time-wasting/encroachment Time-wasting; kicking ball away. Time-wasting; taking too long to leave pitch, take free kick, etc. Stopping the opposition taking a quick free-kick by kicking ball away or holding on to it, or encroachment by defending side at a free kick or penalty kick.
A Typology of Cheating within Soccer What we didnt consider as cheating… Rule violations that are definitely not ethos violations i.e. are part of the ethos though technically against the laws. Jostling, mutual shirt-pulling, defender climbing / forward backing in situations…Its a mans game! Intentional rule violations due to a player losing his temper i.e. where we judged there to be no apparent calculation of the cost or any intention to deceive. Unintentional violations e.g. offside, mistimed tackles. Passive cheating: not informing the officials of a mistake they have made e.g. ball crossing the line.
Why Variation in Cheating May Occur Variation in the amount of cheating in a tournament may exist… within matches, (not yet considered in this study) between players, between teams, between matches.
Why Variation in Cheating May Occur Between player variation in cheating: Mental causes (Hard to measure/find measures of)… Moral identity/moral functioning (Rest, 1984). Legitimacy judgement/acceptance of cheating. Personality (e.g. neuroticism). Motivation: Primary goal perspective; Ego Orientation or Task Orientation (Nicholls, 1984). Experiences of cheating. Physical or Situational causes … Ability, fitness, playing experience and position.
Why Variation in Cheating May Occur Between match variation in cheating: Match stressors… Sudden death matches. Rivalry between teams (local or historical, soccer-specific or deeper national conflict). Balance of possession and closeness of match. Referee effects… Law enforcement and interpretation. Experience and competence.
Why Variation in Cheating May Occur Between team variation in cheating: Team ability (Nilsson,1993)… Good enough not to need to cheat or so bad that only way to win is by cheating. Pressure to maintain past success. Team climate (Hard to measure/find measures of) Collective team climate impacts on moral judgement (e.g., Shields & Bredemeier, 2001). Created by beliefs of members and manager (e.g. Stephens, 2000).
Why Variation in Cheating May Occur Between team variation in cheating: National cultural dimensions… Individualism, Masculinity, Power-distance, Uncertainty/Risk-taking Avoidance (Hofstede; 1990, 2003). Culture dimension scores vary by nation (Hofstede, 2003; Ronen & Shenkar, 1985). A team reflects national culture (Schein, 1985). Which if any national cultural dimensions are important in explaining attitudes to cheating?
Why Variation in Cheating May Occur Between team variation in cheating: National cultural dimensions… Several studies (e.g. Franke & Nadler, 2008), have found that Power Distance and Uncertainty Avoidance negatively impact ethical behaviour in business. The desire to avoid facing the uncertainty of medium-term events motivates risky (often unethical) behaviour in the short-term. Power distance as life is unfair, you might as well take what you can get when you can get it. (Wilson, 2007)
Method We focused on the 2010 World Cup… 64 matches of varying importance. Wide range of player background and team cultures. Feasible to watch and code every game using same coders. Feasible to collect data on objective player, team and match characteristics, and on national cultural dimensions - scores on each Hofstede dimension available for most but not all of WC 2010 nations. Consistent refereeing? Public and official interest.
Method Public and official interest: "FIFA strongly opposes any kind of cheating action, including diving, which goes against the spirit of fair play. …before the 2002 World Cup referees were ordered to crack down on diving, and the same instruction will be given to referees before this year's finals.
Method Two coders independently watched every match in WC2010, coding and reviewing incidents via internet playback, recording each incident in terms of… The type of cheating and its consequences. The identity of the instigator and victim. The match time, match situation, area of pitch. Data aggregated to player-within-match, player, team and match levels. Background data collected on players, teams, matches.
Results Using our adapted Loland classification of cheating In total, 390 incidents of cheating (an average of 5.96 per 90 minute match; 70% detected and punished by referee in some way). 97 incidents of Classic Cheating (1.48, 11% detected), which included 83 incidents of simulation (1.27, 12% detected). 293 Professional Fouls (4.48, 87% detected).
Results Cheating incidents by type, playing position of offender:
Results Cheating rates per 90 minutes by type: top 3 players, matches, teams: Rogues Gallery: Professional FoulsClassic Cheating Players: S. Papastathopoulos (Greece) 2.14 B. Emerton (Australia) 1.42 J. Carragher (England) 1.34 K. Keita (Ivory Coast) 1.91 C. Blanco (Mexico) 1.61 C. Ronaldo (Portugal 1.50 Matches: Portugal vs Brazil (Grp R3) Slovakia vs Italy (Grp R3) Denmark vs Japan (Grp R3) Slovakia vs Italy (Grp R3) 8.00 Chile vs Switzerland (Grp R2) 7.00 Ivory Coast vs Brazil (Grp R2) 6.00 Teams: Australia 4.33 Cameroon 3.67 Brazil 3.50 Italy 2.00 Portugal 2.00 Chile 2.00
Results Cheating rates per 90 minutes by type, team: Professional fouls Classic Cheating
Results Predicting propensity for committing professional fouls: Aim to assess extent of and explain any variation in professional fouling at player, team, opposition and match levels. Data analysed at player within match level. N = 1763 appearances by 599 players from 32 teams, over 64 matches. Distn of DV: 0 = 85%, 1 = 13%, 2 = 1.5%, 3 = 0.5% Count data of rare events; modelled as Poisson, slightly under-dispersed (dispersion parameter = 0.8). Offset term – playing time in that match.
Results Predicting propensity for committing professional fouls: Cross-classified multilevel data; incidents nested within players and matches, players nested with teams, matches defined by the cross of team and opposition. Models fitted using generalized linear mixed models using the lmer function from the lme4 package in R. Unconditional model fitted first to estimate variance partition coefficients via exact calculation formulae of Stryhn et. al (2006) Predictors added; match or team level predictors assessed one-by-one due to small samples.
Results Predicting propensity for committing professional fouls: In unconditional model (Deviance = 1094), higher level VPCs given playing time of 90 minutes: Player = 7%, Match = 3%, Team and Opposition < 1%. Variance largely due to between-player differences within matches.
Results Predicting propensity for classic cheating: Numbers of events per player per match very low (95% = 0), hence data aggregated to player level i.e. DV is number of simulations carried out by each player over tournament. 97 offences in total across 599 players from 32 teams. Distn of DV: 0 offences = 88%, 1 = 8%, 2+ = 4%. Offset term – players total playing time in tournament. Also controlled for minutes team played to attempt to proxy importance of matches faced. DV is count data of rare events; modelled as Poisson, though slightly over-dispersed (disp parameter = 1.1).
Results Predicting propensity for classic cheating: In unconditional model (Deviance = 353), estimated higher level VPC at total playing time of 360 minutes: Team = 11%. Variance largely between players within teams. Team effect is small but not trivial.
Results Predicting propensity for classic cheating: Random effects plots: Model with player positionModel with player position and national culture
Results Predicting propensity for classic cheating: Classic Cheating vs National Cultural Dimensions: Power DistanceUncertainty Avoidance
Conclusions Predictors of professional fouling: Playing position in match: GKs, Forwards, Wingers less likely to commit professional fouls than centre- backs / central midfielders. Opportunity/situational effect. Caps: experienced international players less likely to commit professional fouls. Experience may mean better positioning hence less need top foul; greater ability leads to more caps, less need to foul. Importance of match to team: frequency of offences increases when result of match has immediate importance to team.
Conclusions Predictors of classic cheating: Typical Playing position: Forward midfielders/free- role most likely to commit classic cheating. Opportunity/situational effect. National cultural dimensions: Nations with high power distance and high uncertainty avoidance - such nations are typically located in Latin America, Latin Europe, Eastern Europe - are most likely to commit classic cheating. National cultural dimensions effect matches that found by Franke & Nadler (2008) in a business ethics scenario.
References Cashmore, E. (2000). Sports culture: An A to Z guide. D'Agostino, F. (1981). The Ethos of Games, in W.J. Morgan and K. Meier (eds). Philosophic Inquiry in Sport. Franke, G. R. & Nadler S. S. (2008). Culture, economic development and national ethical attitudes. Journal of Business Research. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Loland, S. and McNamee, M. (2000). Fair Play and the Ethos of Sports: An Eclectic Theoretical Framework. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. Loland, S. (2005). The varieties of cheating comments on ethical analyses in sport . Sport in Society. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice and performance. Psychological Review. Nilsson, P (1993). Fotbollen och moralen. En studie av fyra allsvenska fotbollsföreningar. Rest, J. (1984). The major components of morality. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. Ronen, S. & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering Countries on Attitudinal Dimensions: A Review and Synthesis Academy of Management Review. Schein, E. H. (2005). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Shields, D., & Bredemeier, B. (2001). Moral development and behavior in sport. In R. Singer, H. Hausenblas, & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd Ed.). Stephens, D. (2000). Predictors of Likelihood to Aggress in Youth Soccer: An Examination of Co-ed and All-Girls Teams Journal of Sport Behaviour. Stryhn H., Sanchez J., Morley P., Booker C. and Dohoo I.R. (2006) Interpretation of variance parameters in multilevel Poisson regression models Wilson, J. (2007). Behind the Curtain: Travels in Football in Eastern Europe Contact