Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Migration: Safety Valve or Resource Loss? A Case Study of the Maltese Archipelago Dr Rose Marie Azzopardi University of Malta 16 th International Metropolis.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Migration: Safety Valve or Resource Loss? A Case Study of the Maltese Archipelago Dr Rose Marie Azzopardi University of Malta 16 th International Metropolis."— Presentation transcript:

1 Migration: Safety Valve or Resource Loss? A Case Study of the Maltese Archipelago Dr Rose Marie Azzopardi University of Malta 16 th International Metropolis Conference 12 – 16 September 2011, Azores Islands

2 Outline of Presentation The Maltese Archipelago Migration theories Methodology Maltese Migration, historical overview Modern Migration –Post EU membership –Inter-island mobility –Illegal Migration Economic and social effects Concluding comments 2

3 The Maltese Archipelago 3

4 2010 Three main islands: 316 square kilometres Malta, Gozo, Comino and other islets Population: 417,608 Density: 1,321 per square kilometre Maltese immigration : 1,200 Maltese emigration: 1,863 Working population: full time 146,000 part time 51,000 (of which 22,000 hold a full time job) Employment rate: 57% Unemployment rate: 6.3% 4

5 The Maltese Archipelago 5

6 Economic Structure Sector GDP (%)Employment (%) Agriculture and fisheries 2.171.2 Manufacturing Construction 13.58 3.42 1 7.5 7.5 Services80.8373.8 6

7 Migration theories Theories have grounding in different academic fields Motives can be economic, social, cultural, geographical, political, environmental..... Push-pull factors at play and various processes influence migration behaviour 7

8 8 Source: Bijak 2006

9 Ernest Ravenstein (1889) Geographer: The Laws of Migration –Better external economic conditions –Gender, social class, age influence movement –Mobility is bilateral –Migration decreases with distance –Migration occurs in stages, not one long stretch –Adults migrate –Migration from countryside to city 9

10 Macro Economics Theories (until 1970s) Classical: –demand or employment-driven (Keynesian) – dual economy, country and urban (Lewis), dealing with low and high paid jobs (Poire) Neo-classical: –intersectoral wage differentials (Schultz) – maximization of expected incomes (Todaro) 10

11 Micro economic theories (1980s onwards) Benefits of migrating must be more than costs of going Neo-classical: individuals or households migration behaviour based on economic decisions relating to work and the accumulation of wealth, so wage differentials and job prospects are key Value-expectancy: motivations of personal goals and values, ‘cognitive calculus’, human capital models and social capital models dealing with family and networks New economics: Decisions are undertaken not by sole actors but by families or households, not only to maximize income but also to minimize costs, role of remittances 11

12 Methodology Published data and reports Interviews Focus groups 12

13 Maltese Population Trends 1807 - 93,000 1901 - 184,742 2010 - 417,608 2050 projections: 380,200 (lower birth rate, higher life expectancy and net migration flows) Pre wars temporary migration in the Mediterranean 1946 – 1974 – around 140,000 emigrated 13

14 1946 - 1992 14

15 Migrants and Returned Migrants 1946-2001 and 2005-2010 15

16 Modern Migration Post-EU migration Inter-island migration and mobility Illegal migration 16

17 Post-EU Migration Outward migration: problem areas mainly with professionals, especially medical and IT sectors (in 2000, 28.5%, in 2005, 80%, in 2008 50%, in 2010, 20%) 57.6% of tertiary educated emigrated Inward migration is also high, with persons working in all types of sectors 15.5 thousand, or 3.8% of population, mainly from UK, Australia, Canada, Italy, US, Libya, Germany and France (including 17.5% refugees) 17

18 Post – EU Maltese Migration 18

19 2010 EmigrationImmigrationNet Maltese EU nationals Third Country 1863 2820 1271 5954 1200 6265 689 8154 -663 +3445 -582 2200 19

20 Inter-islands Mobility Gozo 30,020 (2001) - 31,295 (2010) Slight increase in population (4.2%)...not due to natural growth. –Birth: 1999-2009 decrease in birth rate of 28.3% compared to 12.6% in Malta (2010, crude birth rate of 9.65/9.15) –Death: crude death rate is higher than mainland, 9.7% compared to 7.6% Full time employed : 8,530 (2001) 8,977 (2010) –Increase in public sector employment (by transferring back office work from mainland), decrease in manufacturing 18

21 Gozo: Migration and Mobility Inward coming population –Foreign population growth (18.9%) compared to 7.6% nation-wide –Maltese registered with a Gozitan address Outward going population –Out of every 10 marriages between young couples, estimates suggest that 7 are settling down in Malta –Trend has been increasing in last decade, mainly due to lack of jobs, prospects for promotion or a real career in Gozo 21

22 Illegal Migration 2002-2010 –361 boats carrying 13,177 illegal migrants reached the Maltese shores –10,783 filed applications with the Office of the Refugee Commissioner –Out of 10,581 decision taken, 4,450 were rejected, only 271 were granted asylum, while the rest were provided with some form of protection 22

23 2010 176 applications for asylum 115 from Africa and 58 from Asia, the majority in the 18-34 age group 1,992 living in open centres in Malta, of which 1,525 men, 264 women and 203 minors Majority (1,956) from Africa, 17 from Europe and the rest (18) from Asia. 243 persons more were found to be illegally in Malta and obliged to leave the country 23

24 Economic and Social Effects Post EU: Brain drain in certain sectors encouraging more educational courses and more students to take up prospective courses, value expectancy theory knowledge spillover effects from foreign workers in top positions and dual labour market situation in lower end jobs 24

25 Contd. Inter-island: Gozo turning into an old- people’s home, impacting on economic activity in various sectors Tourism related activities at specific times of the year (summer with Maltese and during leaner months with foreigners) Better job prospects for individuals moving or migrating, value expectancy theory/neo- classical/new economics 25

26 Contd. Illegal: stretching the resources of the island Some element of racism People in open centres doing the odd jobs locals are not willing to do at the going wages (construction, waste collection and disposal centres) – dual labour market theory 26

27 Conclusion Traditional migration was considered as a safety valve to avoid high unemployment figures, but also a resource loss in terms of forgone skills and productivity Modern migration is a resource loss for both Gozo and Malta, particularly in the professional sectors, the higher educated but also a resource gain from the impact of foreigners It is a balancing item for the economy. For the individual migration appears to be mainly a positive experience, financially and career wise, with negative aspects related to family ties, which tend to weaken over time 27

28 Thank you for your attention 28


Download ppt "Migration: Safety Valve or Resource Loss? A Case Study of the Maltese Archipelago Dr Rose Marie Azzopardi University of Malta 16 th International Metropolis."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google