Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Management Policy Highlights Workforce Innovations 2005 July 12 and 13, 2005.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Management Policy Highlights Workforce Innovations 2005 July 12 and 13, 2005."— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Management Policy Highlights Workforce Innovations 2005 July 12 and 13, 2005

2 2  Reporting performance is a fundamental element of improving customer services and good public administration  Performance information should be easily understood by all customers, stakeholders, and operators of the workforce investment system  Establishing common measures and standardizing customer data collection improves the comparability and understanding of performance results  Ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of performance results is necessary for demonstrating system integrity and value Workforce System Performance Improving Performance Results

3 3  Focus on the core purposes of the workforce system– employment for adults and skill gain for youth  Break down barriers to integration resulting from different definitions, data and reports for each workforce program  Resolve questions raised by GAO and other oversight agencies regarding the consistency and reliability of data  Reduce confusion among our customers and stakeholders who want to know about results Workforce System Performance Benefits of Common Performance Measures

4 4 Common measures focus on key results for the adult and youth programs; other management information collected will continue to be valuable  Management and oversight of programs will continue to require information that is relevant to each program  Information on statutorily-required performance measures will continue to be collected and reported  Additional information about participants, services and outcomes must supplement the story told by the common measures Workforce System Performance Common Performance Measures

5 5 Three common performance measures apply to programs serving adults:  Entered Employment  Employment Retention  Earnings Increase Three common measures apply to programs serving youth:  Placement in Employment or Education/Advanced Training  Attainment of a Degree or Certificate  Literacy and Numeracy Gains Common Performance Measures

6 6 States have negotiated performance goals for WIA programs for PY 2005 and PY 2006 WIA Adults Entered employment Employment retention Earnings change Employment and credential rate WIA Dislocated Workers Entered employment Employment retention Earnings change Employment and credential rate Note: In addition, states have negotiated performance goals for WIA for Employer customer satisfaction and Job seeker customer satisfaction Accountability WIA Adult and Dislocated Worker, Wagner-Peyser and Trade Programs PY 2005 will be a baseline year for these performance measures for W-P employment services. Goals will be negotiated beginning with PY 2006. W-P employment services Entered employment Employment retention Earnings change States are responsible for achieving National Goals for the Trade program. Trade Entered employment Employment retention Earnings change

7 7 States have negotiated performance goals for WIA programs for PY 2005 and PY 2006 Older Youth Entered employment Employment retention Earnings change Employment and credential rate Younger Youth Skill attainment rate Diploma attainment rate Retention rate Accountability WIA Youth Programs States have not negotiated performance goals for the youth common measures, however states will be expected to begin reporting on these measures All Youth- Common Measures Placement in employment or education/ advanced training (PY05) Attainment of a degree or certificate (PY05) Literacy and numeracy gains (PY05/06) States must collect and report the first two measures beginning in PY05. States are encouraged to begin data collection and reporting for the literacy/numeracy gains measure, although it will not be required until PY06.

8 8 Key Definitions:  Participant – An individual who is determined eligible to participate in the program and receives a service funded by the program in a physical location.*  Exit – Participant does not receive a service funded by the program or a partner program for 90 consecutive calendar days and is not scheduled for future services. * States and grantees are encouraged to consider as participants those individuals who receive services that are available through the Internet and are not accessed through a physical location. Common Performance Measures

9 9 Adult Common Measures Summary of Major Policy Changes TEGL 15-03 Old Policy TEGL 28-04 New Policy ADULT MEASURES Entered Employment Rate  No change in methodology from WIA or TEGL 15-03  Permits grantees to use wage records and supplemental data Employment Retention Rate  Measurement at 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd quarters  No change in methodology from TEGL 15-03  Permits grantees to use wage records and supplemental data Earnings Increase Measure Separated into two distinct indicators of performance 1.Percent change pre- to post-program Qtr 1 2.Percent change post-program Qtr 1 to Qtr 3  Replaces the two-part earnings increase measure identified in TEGL 15-03 with a single Six Month Earnings Increase measure (pre- to post-program)  Wage records are the only data source  Grantees that do not have access to wage records can use supplemental data as an interim means of reporting Program Efficiency  identified as a core common measure  Eliminates program efficiency as a reportable measure at the grantee level

10 10 Measure: Of those who are not employed at the date of participation: Number of participants employed in the 1 st quarter after the exit quarter divided by the number of participants who exit during the quarter  Same as current WIA Adult and Dislocated Worker entered employment definitions  Includes only those not employed at entry  Employment status at participation is based on information from the individual, not wage record data Adult Common Measures Entered Employment

11 11 Measure: Of those who are employed in the 1 st quarter after the exit quarter: Number of participants employed in both the 2 nd and 3 rd quarters after the exit quarter divided by the number of participants who exit during the quarter  Additional measurement point (2 nd quarter) compared to current WIA Adult, Dislocated Worker, and TAA retention rates  Includes all participants employed in the 1 st quarter regardless of their employment status at participation  Employment in the 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd quarters does not have to be with the same employer Adult Common Measures Employment Retention

12 12 Measure: Of those who are employed in the 1 st quarter after the exit quarter: [Total earnings in the 2 nd and 3 rd quarters after exit minus total earnings in the 2 nd and 3 rd quarters prior to participation] divided by the number of participants who exit during the quarter  Same as current WIA Adult Earnings Gain measure, but different than current wage replacement rate for WIA Dislocated Worker and TAA programs  Completely new measure for W-P & VETS programs  Designed as a six month pre- and post-program look at earnings change Adult Common Measures Earnings Increase

13 13  Calculation yields a dollar amount, not a rate  Negative dollar amounts are likely for WIA Dislocated Worker and TAA customers  Wage records will be the only data source for this measure Grantees that do not have access to wage records may use supplemental data as an interim means of reporting on the measure  States and grantees may exclude participant earnings from each of the total quarterly amounts where the following occurs: False or erroneous wage data has been reported to the grantee Individual received severance pay or other earnings attributable to a termination from employment Adult Common Measures Earnings Increase, Cont.

14 14 Youth Common Measures Summary of Major Policy Changes TEGL 15-03 Old Policy TEGL 28-04 New Policy YOUTH MEASURES Placement in Employment or Education  Excluded individuals in secondary school at exit from performance calculations  Individuals in secondary school at exit are now included in the measure  Permits grantees to use wage records and supplemental data Attainment of Degree or Certificate  Excluded individuals in secondary school at exit from performance calculations  Individuals in secondary school at exit are now included in the measure  Clarifies the definition of Diploma  Includes degrees/certificates awarded by tribally- controlled colleges and universities Literacy and Numeracy Gains  Included all in-school and out-of-school youth who were basic skills deficient  In-school youth are now excluded from the measure  Provides additional guidance on providing reasonable accommodations for testing youth with disabilities Program Efficiency  identified as a core common measure  Eliminates Program Efficiency as a reportable measure at the grantee level

15 15 Measure: Of those who are not in post-secondary education, employed, or the military at the date of participation: Number of participants in employment, military, or enrolled in post- secondary education and/or advanced training/occupational skills training in the 1 st quarter after the exit quarter divided by the number of participants who exit during the quarter  Includes individuals in secondary school at participation and exit  Similar to current Younger Youth Retention measure in that it recognizes the same outcomes – improvement from Older Youth Entered Employment  Tighter definition of advanced training Youth Common Measures Placement in Employment or Education

16 16 Measure: Of those who are enrolled in education at participation or any time during the program: Number of participants who attain a diploma, GED, or certificate by the end of the 3rd quarter after the exit quarter divided by the number of participants who exit during the quarter  Similar to a combination of the Younger Youth Diploma Rate and Older Youth Credential Rate  Tighter definition of certificate; does not have employment as a component like the current credential measure  Diplomas, GEDs, or certificates can be obtained while a person is still receiving services or at any point prior to the end of the 3 rd quarter after exit Individuals in secondary school at exit will be included in the measure  Education refers to those in secondary, post-secondary, adult education, or any other organized program of study  Individuals in secondary school at participation and exit will be included in the measure Youth Common Measures Attainment of Degree or Certificate

17 17  Diploma – any credential that the state education agency accepts as equivalent to a high school diploma  Certificate – awarded in recognition of attainment of measurable technical or occupational skills necessary to gain employment or advance within an occupation Based on standards developed or endorsed by employers Certificates awarded by workforce investment boards or in recognition of attaining generic pre-employment or work readiness skills are not included in this definition Youth Common Measures Attainment of Degree or Certificate

18 18 Certificates can be awarded by the following institutions: State educational agency Institutions of higher education (sec. 102 of Higher Education Act) Professional, industry, or employer organization or a product manufacturer or developer Registered apprenticeship program Public regulatory agency Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Job Corps Tribally-controlled colleges and universities Youth Common Measures Attainment of Degree or Certificate

19 19 Measure: Of those out-of-school youth who are basic skills deficient: Number of participants who increase one or more educational functioning levels divided by [the number of participants who have completed a year in the program plus the number of participants who exit before completing a year in the program]  In-school youth are excluded from this measure  Individuals who are not basic skills deficient are excluded from this measure  Includes individuals with learning disabilities, with accommodations and alternate testing options  Creates specific focus on improving basic skills rather than including basic skills among work readiness and occupational skills training  Does not mean work readiness and occupational skills no longer important (impact of those skills will be seen in the Placement in Employment and Education Rate)  Standard for success much higher than with less-defined skill attainment rate Youth Common Measures Literacy and Numeracy Gains

20 20  To be included in the numerator, an individual must advance one or more Adult Basic Education (ABE) or English as a Second Language (ESL) functioning levels  Gain can occur in literacy or numeracy—can pre-test at different levels in each category  Educational functioning levels are consistent with Adult Basic Education’s National Reporting System (NRS)  Initial assessment test must occur within 60 days following the date of participation in the program  Individuals should be post-tested by the end of one year of participation and compared to pre-test results obtained during the initial assessment  Participants only included in measure a second time if they complete a second full year of participation Youth Common Measures Literacy and Numeracy Gains

21 21  Must use one of NRS cross-walked assessment tests or equate alternate test to NRS scale  Tests cross-walked with ABE and ESL levels include: Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Instrument (CASAS) Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) Adult Basic Learning Examination (ABLE) Student Performance Levels for ESL Basic English Skills Test (BEST) for ESL WorkKeys (for the top 3 ABE levels) Youth Common Measures Literacy and Numeracy Gains

22 22  ETA received emergency approval in April 2005 to incorporate common measures into the WIA, W-P, VETS, and TAA program reporting systems Remember, where possible the definitions for common performance measures are replacing “old” definitions  These changes are effective on July 1, 2005 for WIA, W-P, and VETS programs, and October 1, 2005, for the TAA program  ETA will be publishing three 60-day notices on these reporting changes in July to provide opportunity for public comment as part of the full-approval process of these revisions  ETA is considering alternative definitions for the earnings measure Implementation

23 23 Highlights of Changes to Reporting WIA Performance Reporting System  Quarterly Report Collects aggregate counts of self-service participants, the number of participants in training, and youth (by age and school status) Collects current WIA youth measures plus common measures Separate reporting of common measures for Adults, Dislocated Workers, and NEG participants Rolling four-quarter reporting methodology to align with W-P employment services Reporting System Eliminated customer satisfaction reporting on a quarterly basis  Annual Report Collects similar aggregate counts of participants and exiters as the Quarterly Report New report table to collect youth common measures  WIASRD Collects additional data on participant services and outcomes to calculate common measures States do not submit WIASRD files on participants who receive only self- services and informational activities States must report co-enrollment of individuals in Wagner-Peyser or TAA programs

24 24 Highlights of Changes to Reporting Wagner-Peyser Reporting System (ES 9002 and VETS 200)  Aligns performance reporting cohorts with WIA reporting cohorts  Eliminates all customer satisfaction reporting  Collects aggregate counts on participants, exiters, and those receiving workforce information services  Collects aggregate outcomes for the adult common measures  Collects aggregate data on services to Homeless Veterans (VETS 200 C report only)  Eliminates reporting on each category of veteran (e.g., campaign, disabled) by age grouping Trade Act Participant Report (TAPR)  Collects data elements to calculate common measures  Collects information on participant services as authorized under the TAA Reform Act of 2002

25 25 Questions about performance issues? Want updates on performance? Please contact us at:  ETAperforms@dol.gov or 202-693-3031  www.doleta.gov/performance www.doleta.gov/performance Office of Performance and Technology  Karen Staha, staha.karen@dol.govstaha.karen@dol.gov Office of Workforce Investment  Evan Rosenberg, rosenberg.evan@dol.gov (Youth)rosenberg.evan@dol.gov  Gail Eulenstein, eulenstein.gail@dol.gov (Adult/Dislocated Workers)eulenstein.gail@dol.gov  Tony Dais, dais.anthony@dol.gov (W-P employment services) Office of National Response  Terry Clark, clark.terry@dol.gov (TAA) VETS  Pamela Langley, langley.pamela@dol.gov Questions or Comments?


Download ppt "Performance Management Policy Highlights Workforce Innovations 2005 July 12 and 13, 2005."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google