Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJordan James Modified over 4 years ago

1
Quantum t-designs: t-wise independence in the quantum world Andris Ambainis, Joseph Emerson IQC, University of Waterloo

2
Random quantum states Several recent results using random quantum objects: Random quantum states; Random unitary transformations; Random orthonormal bases.

3
Private quantum channels Alice wants to send | to Bob, over a channel that may be eavesdropped by Eve. Alice and Bob share a classical secret key i, which they can use to encrypt |. A B | Eve

4
Private quantum channels [Hayden et al., 2001]: Let N = dim |. Let U 1, U 2, … be O(N log N) unitaries, known to both Alice and Bob. Alice randomly chooses U i, sends U i |. A B | U i | |

5
Private quantum channels [Hayden et al., 2001]: If U 1, U 2, …are uniformly random unitary transformations, Eve gets almost no information about |. A B | U i | |

6
Summary Random quantum objects are useful! How do we generate and describe a random state? A random state on n qubits has 2 n amplitudes. Since amplitudes are random, 2 n are bits required to describe the state. Protocols are highly inefficient!

7
Quantum pseudorandomness We want small sets of quantum states, with properties similar to random states. In this talk: quantum counterpart of t- wise independence.

8
Outline 1.Definition of quantum t-wise independence; 2.Explicit construction of a t-wise independent set of quantum states. 3.Derandomizing measurements in a random basis.

9
Part 1 Defining quantum pseudorandomness

10
Quantum t-designs Sets of quantum states | that are indistinguishable from Haar measure if we are given access to t copies of |. Quantum state = unit vector in N complex dimensions. Haar measure = uniform probability distribution over the unit sphere.

11
Polynomials A quantum state has the form Let f( )= f( 1, 2, …, N ) be a degree-t polynomial in the amplitudes.

12
Polynomials Haar measure: Finite probability distribution A set of quantum states is a t-design if and only if E f = E h, for any polynomial f of degree t.

13
Polynomials Haar measure: Finite probability distribution If E f is almost the same as E h, then the distribution is an approximate t-design.

14
State-of-the art 1-design with N states (orthonormal basis) 2-designs with O(N 2 ) states (well- known) t-designs with O(N 2t ) states (Kuperberg)

15
Our contribution 1.Approximate t-designs with O(N t log c N) states for any t. (Quadratic improvement over previous bound) 2.Derandomization using approximate 4- design.

16
Part 2 Construction of approximate t-designs

17
Step 1 Let f( 1, …, N, 1 *, …, N * ) be a polynomial of degree t. We want: a set of states for which E[f] is almost the same as for random state. Suffices to restrict attention to f a monomial. Further restrict to monomials in 1 and 1 *. Design a probability distribution P 1 for 1.

18
Step 2 For a general monomial f, write f=f 1 ( i 1 )…f k ( i k ), If we choose each amplitude i independently from P 1, E[f 1 ] … E[f k ] have the right values. E[f] E[f 1 ] … E[f k ].

19
The problem If we choose each amplitude independently, there are ~c N possible states Exponential in the Hilbert space dimension!

20
t-wise independent distributions Probability distributions over ( 1, …, N ) in which every set of t coordinates is independent. Well studied in classical CS. Efficient constructions, with O(N t ) states.

21
Step 3 Modify t-wise independent distribution so that each i is distributed according to P 1. For each ( 1, …, N ), take Set of O(N t log c N) quantum states.

22
Final result Theorem Let t>0 be an integer. For any N, there exists an -approximate t- design in N dimensions with O(N t log c N) states. States in the t-design can be efficiently generated.

23
Application:measurements in a random basis

24
Task We are given one of two orthogonal quantum states | 0, | 1. Determine if the state is | 0 or | 1.

25
Simple solution Measurement basis that includes | 0 and | 1. The other basis vectors are orthogonal to | 0 and | 1. | 0, | 1, | 2, …, | 0 0 | 1 1 What if we dont know prior to designing the measurement which states well have to distinguish?

26
Measurement in a random basis Let | 0, | 1 be orthogonal quantum states. Theorem [Radhakrishnan, et al., 2005] Let M be a random orthonormal basis. Let P 0 and P 1 be probability distributions obtained by measuring | 0, | 1 w.r.t. M. W.h.p., P 0 and P 1 differ by at least c>0 in variation distance.

27
Measurement in a non-random basis Let | 0 and | 1 be orthogonal quantum states. Theorem Let M be an approximate 4-design. Let P 0, P 1 be the probability distributions obtained by measuring | 0, | 1 w.r.t. M. We always have |P 0 -P 1 |>c. Here, |P 0 -P 1 |= i |P 0 (i)-P 1 (i)|.

28
Proof sketch We would like to express |P 0 -P 1 | as a polynomial in the amplitudes of the measurement basis. Problem: |P 0 -P 1 | not a polynomial.

29
Proof sketch Solution is to switch to quantities that are polynomials in the amplitudes: |P 0 -P 1 | 2 2 = i |P 0 (i)-P 1 (i)| 2 ; |P 0 -P 1 | 4 4 = i |P 0 (i)-P 1 (i)| 4. Bounds on |P 0 -P 1 | 2 2,|P 0 -P 1 | 4 4 imply bound on |P 0 -P 1 |. Fourth moment method [Berger, 1989].

30
Summary Definition of approximate t-designs for quantum states. Constructions of approximate t-designs with O(N t log c N) states. Derandomization for measurements, using a 4-design (first application of t- designs for t>2 in quantum information).

31
Open problem t-designs for unitary transformations? Known constructions for t=1, t=2. Proofs of existence for t>2. No efficient constructions for t>2.

Similar presentations

OK

Quantum Key Establishment Wade Trappe. Talk Overview Quantum Demo Quantum Key Establishment.

Quantum Key Establishment Wade Trappe. Talk Overview Quantum Demo Quantum Key Establishment.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google