1. Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ESD 112 March 12, 2015

2. Slide 2 Purposes of Evaluation Acknowledge the critical importance of teacher and leadership quality in impacting student growth and support professional learning Identify particular areas of strength and opportunities for improvement Assist educators needing improvement in making those improvements WAC 392-191A-050

3. Slide 3 TPEP 2014-15 Transition Year 2 of 3 - all new educators and those on probation - most experienced educators (local decision) » 83% of teachers, 95% of principals have transitioned » 49% teachers on Comprehensive, 34% on Focused $5m in teacher training allocated to districts » 80% additional pay for educators to facilitate or participate in professional learning re TPEP

4. Slide 4 General Perceptions Growth mindset is a big paradigm shift Focus moved from details to purpose District leaders views differ from those of principals/teachers This work is worthwhile, but not smooth

5. Slide 5 Key Messages Be relentless about rater agreement Relationships and dialogue matter Integrate evaluation with learning standards and assessment practices that promote learning Build regional and local capacity

6. Slide 6 Challenges Assessment practices that promote student learning Principal support Use of evaluation data

7. Slide 7 Assessment Practices Deepen TPEP understanding of T&L and SSS staff; state, regional, district Explicitly link TPEP and CCSS initiatives Use new SBAC tools to improve instruction Working toward a statewide vision of research-based assessment practices

8. Slide 8 Principal Support AWSP, WASA and AESD collaborating to extend knowledge and skill Regional principal networks, some district leader networks

9. Slide 9 Evaluation Data ABC Highly Effective 38552 Effective5893.743 Needs Improvement 41.34.6 Unsat.100.4 If these schools were in your district what questions might you ask?

10. Slide 10 Building Agreement Questions for district and school leaders to consider when examining their own data Rater agreement planning tool, videos, workshops, consistent practice

11. Slide 11 tpep-wa.org Rater Agreement in the Revised System State and Local Decision Matrix, FAQs Tool for Examining Local Data Summative vs. Focused Scoring charts Questions for Examining Evaluation Data

12. Slide 12 What’s in Your Contract? Principal calendars an observation for next week. Principal spends 20 minutes observing unannounced. Principal observes new teacher in December. What might you want to keep doing, stop doing, re-think?

13. Slide 13 What are the requirements for… …the summative report? …Low student growth impact rating on a Comprehensive? …“1” in any SG rubric row?

14. Slide 14 Who is Monitoring? First year teacher Provisional educator with P and D Provisional educator with B or U Experienced educator with P or D Experienced educator with B or U Educator with Low Student Growth Impact Rating Experienced educator with B and B Experienced educator with three previous Focused

15. Slide 15 Evaluation data and HR MUST be a factor in 2015-16 Distinguished educators must be recognized OSPI collected baseline data about 2013-14 uses in SEES What conversations have taken place in your district? Who else needs to be involved?

16. Slide 16 Contact Information Jeanne Harmon, OSPI Jeanne.harmon@k12.wa.us 360-725-6116 tpep-wa.org