1. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 WorldSID Advanced Harmonised Dummy for Side Impact Martin Page C.E.E.S.A.R. (representing LAB) On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group

2. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Background: The WorldSID Project Project under auspices of ISO TC22/SC12/WG5Project under auspices of ISO TC22/SC12/WG5 Goal to replace all existing adult side impact dummies with a single, highly biofidelic model acceptable to all usersGoal to replace all existing adult side impact dummies with a single, highly biofidelic model acceptable to all users Government, industry & researchers working togetherGovernment, industry & researchers working together Large choice of instrumentationLarge choice of instrumentation

3. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Project Organisation WorldSID Task Group ISO TC22 / SC12 / WG5 Working Group - Anthropomorphic Test Devices IHRA Project Manager Design Team European Advisory Group Asia-Pacific Advisory Group Americas Advisory Group World-wide governments Co-ordination

4. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Project Timeline 1998200020012002200320041999 Set up programme and develop specifications Prototype development Prototype evaluation Pre-production dummy development Pre-production dummy evaluation Production dummy development Final specifications Release into public domain

5. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Milestones June1997 ISO/TC22/SC12/WG5 resolution followed by creation of Task Group & regional groupsJune1997 ISO/TC22/SC12/WG5 resolution followed by creation of Task Group & regional groups Oct.1998Project Manager contractedOct.1998Project Manager contracted Jan.1999Request for Quote for dummy designJan.1999Request for Quote for dummy design Mar.1999presentation of conceptsMar.1999presentation of concepts then creation of Design Team Sep.1999completion of design specificationSep.1999completion of design specification June2000sign off of dummy designJune2000sign off of dummy design June1997 ISO/TC22/SC12/WG5 resolution followed by creation of Task Group & regional groupsJune1997 ISO/TC22/SC12/WG5 resolution followed by creation of Task Group & regional groups Oct.1998Project Manager contractedOct.1998Project Manager contracted Jan.1999Request for Quote for dummy designJan.1999Request for Quote for dummy design Mar.1999presentation of conceptsMar.1999presentation of concepts then creation of Design Team Sep.1999completion of design specificationSep.1999completion of design specification June2000sign off of dummy designJune2000sign off of dummy design

6. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Milestones (cont’d) Sep.2000assembly of prototypeSep.2000assembly of prototype Dec.2000delivery of prototypeDec.2000delivery of prototype Dec.2000first crash tests and WorldSID WorkshopDec.2000first crash tests and WorldSID Workshop Jan.2001evaluation of prototype biofidelityJan.2001evaluation of prototype biofidelity Jun.2001identification of initial modificationsJun.2001identification of initial modifications followed by application of modifications …

7. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Next Steps Re-testing of modified prototypeRe-testing of modified prototype Development of pre-production dummyDevelopment of pre-production dummy Sale of approx. 9 pre-prod’n dummies to finance developmentSale of approx. 9 pre-prod’n dummies to finance development Comprehensive evaluation of pre-prod’n dummies around the worldComprehensive evaluation of pre-prod’n dummies around the world Final developmentFinal development Release of final design into public domainRelease of final design into public domain

8. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Description of Dummy advanced design

9. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Anthropometry 50th percentile male50th percentile male overall height:1753 mm seated height:911 mm total mass: 77,3 kg Complies with UMTRI anthropometryComplies with UMTRI anthropometry data for adult crash test dummies Biofidelity Goal: ‘Good’ to ‘Excellent’ on ISO TR9790 scaleGoal: ‘Good’ to ‘Excellent’ on ISO TR9790 scaleAnthropometry 50th percentile male50th percentile male overall height:1753 mm seated height:911 mm total mass: 77,3 kg Complies with UMTRI anthropometryComplies with UMTRI anthropometry data for adult crash test dummies Biofidelity Goal: ‘Good’ to ‘Excellent’ on ISO TR9790 scaleGoal: ‘Good’ to ‘Excellent’ on ISO TR9790 scale

10. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Head Neck shroud One-piece polymer skull Seamless skin Frontal & lateral biofidelity One-piece polymer skull Seamless skin Frontal & lateral biofidelity Instrumentation core

11. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Thorax, Shoulder, Abdomen IR-TRACC rear Outer rib Inner rib 75mm deflection 75mm deflection

12. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Lumbar Spine New concept for de-coupling of pelvis and thorax Load cell

13. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001Pelvis rear Sacro-iliac load cells lumbar load cell Femur neck load cells pubic load cell no hidden load paths

14. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Lower Extremities Fully instrumentedFully instrumented Specific designSpecific design Femoral neck load cell Femoral neck load cell DAS module box DAS module box Knee rotation sensor Knee rotation sensor Knee contact load cells Knee contact load cells Leg load cell Leg load cell

15. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Upper Extremity Half arm Instrumentedarm 3-axis Shoulder LC 3-axis Shoulder LC 6-axis Universal Arm LC 6-axis Universal Arm LC 2-axis Elbow LC (Mx,My) 2-axis Elbow LC (Mx,My) Triaxial Accelerometer Triaxial Accelerometer Elbow Angular Sensor Elbow Angular Sensor

16. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Optional In-Dummy Data Acquisition 7 DAS modules in dummy 0ver 200 channels available Signal conditioning moved to the sensor. Distributed, modular data acquisition. Drastically reduced wire bundles inside dummy. Umbilical from dummy is for power, com, and trigger.

17. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Biofidelity Evaluation of prototypeEvaluation of prototype All ISO TR 9790 tests performedAll ISO TR 9790 tests performed Testing by Transport Canada & Medical College Wisconsin (sponsored NHTSA)Testing by Transport Canada & Medical College Wisconsin (sponsored NHTSA) Tests on right and left sideTests on right and left side 3 tests per side3 tests per side Reported at 2001 Stapp Conference:Reported at 2001 Stapp Conference: WorldSID prototype Dummy Biomechanical Responses, Cesari et al. WorldSID prototype Dummy Biomechanical Responses, Cesari et al.

18. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 ISO Rating (from TR 9790) Response completely inside corridor B = 10 Response within one corridor width outside corridor B = 5 Response more than one corridor width outside corridor B = 0 Mean score for each body segment After weighting body segments, mean of body segments = overall B Excellent Biofidelity: 8,6  B  10,0 Good Biofidelity: 6,5  B  8,6 Fair Biofidelity: 4,4  B  6,5 Marginal Biofidelity: 2,6  B  4,4 Unacceptable Biofidelity: 0,0  B  2,6 Response completely inside corridor B = 10 Response within one corridor width outside corridor B = 5 Response more than one corridor width outside corridor B = 0 Mean score for each body segment After weighting body segments, mean of body segments = overall B Excellent Biofidelity: 8,6  B  10,0 Good Biofidelity: 6,5  B  8,6 Fair Biofidelity: 4,4  B  6,5 Marginal Biofidelity: 2,6  B  4,4 Unacceptable Biofidelity: 0,0  B  2,6

19. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Summary – Prototype Biofidelity Evaluation SegmentScoreRating Head10Excellent (Head – frontal)(5)(Fair) Neck3,61Marginal Shoulder5,2Fair Thorax6,77Good Abdomen6,33Fair Pelvis4,21Marginal Full dummy6,13Fair Excellent Biofidelity: 8,6  B  10,0 Good Biofidelity: 6,5  B  8,6 Fair Biofidelity: 4,4  B  6,5 Score Eurosid Score Biosid 3.3 54.6 4.35.7 5.94.1 4.25 3.55.5 4.444.64 Bendjellal et al, ESV 13

20. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Summary of Results Head: good lateral biofidelity – frontal response is second priority but only minor modification to meet objective Neck: - difficult to meet both lateral and frontal response requirements - Response influenced by shoulder – More work to be done Shoulder: to be stiffened – should easily meet objective Thorax: meets objective Abdomen: objective should be met after modification Pelvis: appears to be too stiff - Check bone/flesh mass distribution - Design may be incompatible with TR 9790 sled tests with padding Head: good lateral biofidelity – frontal response is second priority but only minor modification to meet objective Neck: - difficult to meet both lateral and frontal response requirements - Response influenced by shoulder – More work to be done Shoulder: to be stiffened – should easily meet objective Thorax: meets objective Abdomen: objective should be met after modification Pelvis: appears to be too stiff - Check bone/flesh mass distribution - Design may be incompatible with TR 9790 sled tests with padding

21. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 Repeatability Biofidelity evaluation indicates good repeatablityBiofidelity evaluation indicates good repeatablity Durability Over 100 biofidelity tests + 2 full scale tests -Over 100 biofidelity tests + 2 full scale tests - only minor damage

22. Presentation to the GRSP December 2001Summary The performance of the WorldSID prototype dummy has been very promisingThe performance of the WorldSID prototype dummy has been very promising Development work is continuingDevelopment work is continuing Final dummy release into public domain and launch of production dummy expected on schedule in 2004Final dummy release into public domain and launch of production dummy expected on schedule in 2004