1. Credit to Thomas R. Guskey

2. Systemic Change  Change is a highly complex process  Professional development is essential

4. Guiding Questions  What are the major reasons we use report cards and assign grades to students’ work?  Ideally, what purposes should report cards or grades serve?  What elements should teachers use in determining students’ grades? (For example, major assessments, homework, attendance, class participation)

5. Purposes of Grading  Communicate the Achievement Status of Students to their Parents and Others  Provide Information for Student Self- Evaluation  Select, Identify, or Group Students to Learn  Provide Incentives for Students to Learn  Documents students’ performance to evaluate the Effectiveness of Instructional Programs  Provide Evidence of Students’ Lack of Effort or Inappropriate Responsibility

6. Guiding Questions  What product, process, and progress criteria should be reported at each level?  Within each subject area, how many standards will be reported? What are they?  How many levels of performance will be reported for each standard? How will those be labeled?  Will teachers’ comments be encouraged and included? What form will these take? How will they be recorded?  How should things be arranged on the report? What format will be used? What information will be included?  What will parents be expected to do with the information?  What policies need to accompany these new reporting procedures? (ie. The use of zeros, absentees, punctuality of assignments, make-up work, behavioral infractions, homework, final exams, etc.)

9. Checking is Diagnostic (teacher is an Advocate) Grading is Evaluative (teacher is a Judge)

11. Purposes of Grading  Communicate the Achievement Status of Students to their Parents and Others  Provide Information for Student Self- Evaluation  Select, Identify, or Group Students to Learn  Provide Incentives for Students to Learn  Documents students’ performance to evaluate the Effectiveness of Instructional Programs  Provide Evidence of Students’ Lack of Effort or Inappropriate Responsibility

12. Advantages: Brief and generally understood Disadvantages: Require abstraction of lots of info, cut- offs are arbitrary, easily misinterpreted

13. Advantages: Provide finer discriminations and increase variation in grades Disadvantages: Require abstraction of lots of info, increased number of arbitrary cut-offs, greater influence of subjectivity

14. Advantages: Clear description of Achievement and Useful for Diagnosis and Prescription Disadvantages: Often complicated for parents to understand and seldom communicate the appropriateness of progress

15. Steps in Developing Standards Based Grading (SBG)  Identify the major learning goals or standards that students will be expected to achieve in each course of study  Establish performance indicators for the learning goals or standards  Determine graduated levels of performance (benchmarks) for assessing each goal or standard  Develop reporting forms that communicate teachers’ judgments of students’ learning progress and culminating achievement in relation to the learning goals or standards

16. Guidelines for Reporting on Standards  Avoid Comparative Language Below average, average, and superior communicates standing among classmates, not progress on standards  Provide Examples Based on Student Work Show precisely what each level of performance means, based on models of excellence  Distinguish “Levels of Understanding” and “Frequency of Display” Quality is not the same as rate of occurrence  Be Consistent Use similar terms across school levels, assessments, instructional materials, and reporting forms

18. The more detailed the reporting method The more analytic the reporting process The more effort is considered The more behavior influences judgments

19. The Challenge: To balance Reporting Needs with Instructional Purposes

21. Questionable Practices  Averaging to Obtain a Course Grade  Giving Zeros for Work Missed or Work Turned in Late  Taking Credit Away from Students for Infractions

22. Alternatives to Averaging Inconsistent Evidence on Student Learning:  Give priority to the most recent evidence  Give priority to the most comprehensive evidence  Give priority to evidence related to the most important learning goals or standards

23. Alternatives to Giving Zeros:  Assign “I” or “incomplete” grades Include specific and immediate consequences  Report behavioral aspects separately Separate product from process and progress  Change grading scales Use integers (A=4, B=3... ) instead of percentages

28. 1. Students’ level of performance 2. The Quality of the Teaching

29. Report cards, notes home, progress reports, phone calls, open house, newsletters, homework, web pages, conferences

31. Negative grading experience Positive grading experience

32. Goals for Reporting and Grading 1. Begin with a Clear Statement of Purpose 2. Provide Accurate and Understandable Descriptions of Learning 3. Use Grading and Reporting to Enhance Teaching and Learning