Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How to Trace the Growth in Learners’ Active Vocabulary? -- a corpus based study Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska TEFL Unit University of Łódź.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "How to Trace the Growth in Learners’ Active Vocabulary? -- a corpus based study Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska TEFL Unit University of Łódź."— Presentation transcript:

1 How to Trace the Growth in Learners’ Active Vocabulary? -- a corpus based study Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska TEFL Unit University of Łódź

2 Dimensions of learners’ vocabulary knowledge zpassive knowledge zactive knowledge in an elicitation task zactive knowledge in a free production task

3 Test measuring receptive vocabulary size zVocabulary Levels Test (Nation 1983, 1990) zEurocentres Vocabulary Size Test (Meara & Jones 1990)

4 Test measuring productive vocabulary size zVocabulary Levels Test (active version) (Laufer and Nation 1995)

5 Some measures of lexical richness zLexical Density zLexical Originality zLexical Variation zLexical Sophistication zOthers less frequently employed tests: semantic variation, lexical quality, T-unit length, error free T-unit length (Laufer and Nation 1995, Meunier 1998)

6 Reasearch aims zto compare the validity of two measures of lexical richness: ylexical variation ylexical sophistication zto trace and analyse the growth of receptive and productive vocabulary in advanced learners of English at two different proficiency levels

7 Tools zVocabulary Levels Test (receptive version) zWordsmith zVocabProfile

8 Vocabulary Levels Test zoriginal zprivate__________complete zroyal__________first zslow__________not public zsorry ztotal

9 Lexical variation measure zType/Token Ratios yType/Token Ratio yStandardised Type/Token Ratio (300 words) yStandardised Type/Token Ratio (150 words) yStandardised Type/Token Ratio (450 words) -- YEAR IV only

10 Lexical sophistication measure zLexical s ophistication: Lexical Frequency Profile y1000 y2000 yUWL (Xue & Nation 1984) ynot in the lists (> 2000)

11 Receptive vocabulary size YEAR I & YEAR IV zYEAR I 100 students range 5455 -- 9646 word families mean = 8236,1 SD = 936,136 zYEAR II 67 students range 7601 -- 10000 word families mean = 9218,21 SD = 665,933

12 Comparison of receptive vocab. YEAR I & YEAR IV

13 zmean Year I < mean Year IV zt = -7,41823 zP-value = 1,15253E-7

14 Essay statistics YEAR I & YEAR IV zYEAR I 100 essays range 302 -- 659 tokens mean = 486,75 SD = 64,8036 zYEAR II 67 essays range 466 -- 1030 tokens mean = 714,343 SD = 124,573

15 Comparison of Type/Token Ratios YEAR I & YEAR IV

16 Lexical Frequency Profile YEAR I

17 Lexical Frequency Profile YEAR IV

18 Comparison of LFP levels YEAR I & YEAR IV

19

20 Comparison of Type/Token Ratios and receptive vocabulary size

21 Comparison of LFP levels and receptive vocabulary size


Download ppt "How to Trace the Growth in Learners’ Active Vocabulary? -- a corpus based study Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska TEFL Unit University of Łódź."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google