0. ANITA Work Breakdown Structure and Schedule
K. Liewer

1. Proposal Work Breakdown Structure
Project Management
UH/JPL
Mission System Eng.
UH/JPL/Bartol/Penn
Science
Instrument Development
UH/Bartol/Penn
Gondola Development
UCI/Penn/UM
Payload Integration
UCI
Calibration
UCLA/UH
Operations
UCLA/UH/JPL
NOTE: box size proportional to budget

2. WBS item description Project management Mission system engineering
PI and project manager support
Mission system engineering
EMI survey
environmental testing
system engineering
mission assurance
Science
algorithm/software development
science data analysis
Instrument development
antennas, front end (RF/IF), digitizers
flight computer and storage, flight software
LOS telemetry
refurbishment

3. WBS description (cont’d)
Gondola development
engineering workforce
materials and services
power system development
payload integration
engineering workforce, materials
integration and test support
Calibration
antenna calibration
Antarctic calibration system
calibrate system and deploy
Operations
ground data system development
data acquisition and archiving
instrument packaging and delivery
operations support

4. Task flow diagram

5. ANITA schedule from proposal

6. Concerns We are roughly 1/2 year behind schedule
scheduled requirements review is one (short) month away
originally planned two quarters of work preparing requirements
‘03 money will probably not arrive until beginning of third quarter
may not cause a big slip; but it can’t help
Schedule is just a strawman
fidelity should improve as we progress through the review cycle
work does not tend to shrink
need to find realistic ways to shorten up the schedule if we are to make the ‘06/’07 launch window

7. Needs Preliminary requirements ASAP
List of receivables and deliverables
make sure nothing gets left undone (or done twice)
make sure everyone knows their responsibilities
Estimates from the doing organizations on cost and schedule