1. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management Cultural Relevance of the Tao in Construction Project Management Tao and Dimensions of Culture of Hofstede (1991) Tao and Dimensions of Culture of Trompenaars (1993)

2. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management Five Dimensions of Culture of Hofstede Individualism or Collectivism Large or Small Power Distance Strong or Weak Uncertainty Avoidance Masculinity or Femininity Short or Long Term Orientation Confucianis m

3. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management (1) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Individualism-Collectivism of Hofstede (1) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Individualism-Collectivism of Hofstede Note: ‘ST’ represents strong adherence of the Tao concepts and ‘SL’ represents slight adherence.

4. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management (2) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Power Distance of Hofstede (2) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Power Distance of Hofstede Note: ‘ST’ represents strong adherence of the Tao concepts and ‘SL’ represents slight adherence.

5. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management (3) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Uncertainty Avoidance of Hofstede (3) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Uncertainty Avoidance of Hofstede Note: ‘ST’ represents strong adherence of the Tao concepts and ‘SL’ represents slight adherence.

6. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management (4) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Masculinity-Femininity of Hofstede (4) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Masculinity-Femininity of Hofstede Note: ‘ST’ represents strong adherence of the Tao concepts and ‘SL’ represents slight adherence.

7. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management (5) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Confucian Dynamism (5) Relationship Between Tao Concepts & Confucian Dynamism Note: ‘ST’ represents strong adherence of the Tao concepts and ‘SL’ represents slight adherence.

8. “Jesus” TAO and Project Management Comparison of Scores by Hong Kong, USA, UK, and Tao Culture on the Cultural Dimensions under HofstedeCONCLUSION: