Download presentation
1
Jean Hughes Office of the Vice President for Learning Innovation, DCU
2
Overview DCU Approach Framework Implementation Network
Learning Outcomes General – Assessment of Learning Outcomes Common Questions
3
DCU Already Modularised and Semesterised (1997)
Module Descriptors use ‘Learning Outcomes’ European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) well established But Mainly administrative exercise Academic Framework for Innovation (AFI) – for Deep Curriculum Reform (3 year project) Bologna Compliance Demonstrable Alignment with NFQ Use of Learning Outcomes – for real change in assessment practice Flexibility – Designed in and through new Marks & Standards
4
Framework Implementation Network
Created by the IUA and the NQAI Membership 7 Universities NUI Colleges Purpose – to collectively address outstanding issues relating to Bologna and the National Framework of Qualifications Three separate Working Groups Award Titling Disciplinary Learning Outcomes Assessment of Learning Outcomes
5
Key Issues Ensuring that Assessment, Teaching and Learning are aligned
Moving from assessing content to assessing outcomes Ensuring all outcomes are assessed and all assessment instruments actually assess outcomes Avoiding over-assessment
6
Learning Outcomes Clearly identify what a learner can demonstrate as a result of successfully completing a part of a learning programme They describe student attainment which is demonstrable and assessable.
7
Benefits of Learning Outcomes
Guide students in their learning - what is expected of them - in turn helping them to succeed in their studies. Help lecturers to focus on exactly what they want students to achieve in terms of both knowledge and skills. Provide a useful guide to inform employers about the general knowledge and understanding that a graduate will possess.
8
Challenges Traditional view
inputs = quality of learning outcomes Moving from content (Teaching) focus to Outcome (Learning) focus Aligning teaching, learning and assessment
9
Award and Module Outcomes
NFQ describes generic, high level outcomes for awards at each level under 3 strands and 8 substrands How do we demonstrate achievement of award outcomes? We don’t assess at award level we assess at module level Need to ensure that module learning outcomes collectively deliver the award outcomes
10
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 Alignment of Programme and Module Outcomes
PO – Programme Outcome Mod - Module
11
Assessing Learning Outcomes
12
Constructive Alignment
is the underpinning concept behind the current requirements for programme specification, declarations of intended learning outcomes and assessment criteria, and the use of criterion based assessment. (Biggs, 1999)
13
Example – Project Management
Learning Outcome (Mismatched) (Matched) Tasks Students will understand how to plan a multi-disciplinary project Students will demonstrate ability to plan a multi-disciplinary project Assignment 1 Students will complete an in-class test on Project Management Students will devise an appropriate project plan from a scenario/business case study Assignment 2 Students will create a Project Plan using MS Project during labs Students will create a Project Plan in MS Project from the plan in Assignment 1. They will be demonstrate appropriate use of Base Lines, Serial and Parallel Tasks, Variances, Resource Allocation and Critical Path, through an in-lab demonstration. Final exam 1 Question on final exam Case Study exam question requiring analysis of a Business Problem, design of appropriate project plan and discussion of variety of project planning issues.
14
Student Perspective From our students’ point of view, assessment always defines the actual curriculum (Ramsden, 1992) Biggs (2003) Teacher Perspectives: Objectives Learning Outcomes Teaching Activities Assessment Assessment Learning Activities Outcomes Student Perspectives Alignment If curriculum is reflected in the assessment, the teaching activities and the learner activities are directed towards the same goal – in preparing for the assessment students will be learning the curriculum
15
Assessment – Impact (Boud, 1995)
“There is probably more bad practice and ignorance of significant issues in the area of assessment than in any other aspect of higher education”. “The effects of bad practice are far more potent than they are for any aspect of teaching. Students can, with difficulty, escape from the effects of poor teaching, they cannot (by definition if they want to graduate) escape the effects of poor assessment”.
16
Assessment - Terminology
Learning Outcomes What a student should be able to demonstrate (May imply the assessment criteria) Assessment Criteria The basis on which a judgement of the adequacy of the student work is made Assessment Methods The task(s) undertaken by the student – writing an essay, answering an exam question etc- that is subject to assessment. Many assessment methods may be appropriate to the same outcomes – e.g. Written, Oral, Visual, Project etc Must be valid and reliable – Fit for purpose
17
Over-Assessment Typical with semesterisation and modularisation
High risk with learning outcomes Tend to be quite granular and have several independent outcomes To avoid Try combining the assessment of more than one LO LOs only need to be assessed once Use assessments which inform/follow on from each other Check what you are assessing
18
Checking Assessment Issues:
What does assignment 3 assess? How is Learning Outcome 2 assessed? Are Learning Outcomes 1 and 4 over-assessed?
19
Refining Assessment Perhaps design a new assessment 3 to re-balance?
20
Common Questions
21
Must all outcomes be assessed?
Yes, but Not independently Look at how you write the learning outcomes Students are expected to be able to Write a business report Present orally Design a visual presentation versus Communicate effectively using a combination of written reports, oral presentations and visual media This reduces the number of independent outcomes and also recognises the combination of communication mechanisms BUT For certain disciplines, for example languages, you may need these to be independently demonstrated
22
Example In a Business Module (1 outcome)
Students are expected to be able to communicate effectively in a business context using appropriate communication tools including Written, Oral and Visual The outcome is communication, the tools are some means of demonstrating that outcome In a languages Module (4 outcomes) Students are expected to be able to demonstrate written proficiency in French Students are expected to be able to translate a piece of French text Students are expected to be able to comprehend a piece of French text Students are expected to be able to deliver an oral presentation in French
23
Must all outcomes be passed?
In theory, yes, but… Threshold Achievement Implies that ALL learning outcomes must be passed in order to pass a module Very strict interpretation of LO approach Leads to reductionist or ‘Tick Box’ approaches Typical Achievement Learning outcomes are written (and assessed) with the ‘typical’ or ‘’average’ student in mind Grading criteria will allocate marks to degree of achievement
24
But, we don’t currently assess everything….
Exams often require only 3 out of 5 questions Therefore we don’t assess everything But Generally this refers to content Outcomes should be about demonstrating knowledge/understanding aided by knowledge of content, not content in its own right Assessment criteria and methods should satisfy you that students can demonstrate achievement of the outcomes Worst-case scenario – no worse than current situation!
25
What if some outcomes are failed?
Depends on the criticality of the outcome If particular outcomes must be passed then passing other outcomes should not be able to compensate Need to look at ‘Threshold’ and ‘Typical’ Outcomes Need to write outcomes carefully Need to ensure that supplemental/repeat assessment is also valid
26
What about repeats? Did they actually fail?
“Students will present orally on 20th century politics” If they don’t attend they fail….. Is this what you meant? or “Students will effectively communicate on 21th century politics” You may prioritise Oral assessment and allocate more marks, but this allows more choice of methods If a student has to repeat the supplemental assessment must be valid if different from the original Look at how you write the outcomes
27
Is it an Outcome, An Assessment or an Efficiency?
Often mix up pedagogical (or efficiency) approaches with learning outcomes Example Group Working Learning Outcome ‘Students will demonstrate effective group working skills’ Group working needs to be ‘taught’ and assessed Can’t assume that putting people in groups will automatically lead to effective group working! How does an individual student repeat? ‘Students will be able to evaluate group dynamics and effective group working’ Would this suffice but give an alternative assessment approach for repeat students? Pedagogical Approach Group working is used to facilitate learning of a particular outcome Not assessing the group working – assessing the actual outcome Efficiency Often used to reduce the volume of marking Need to be careful that it is pedagogically sound Not assessing group working
28
Making the Tacit Explicit
Some disciplines rely on expertise of the individual lecturer ‘I know a good piece of work when I see it’ ‘You can’t possibly express Creativity, Performance, Medieval English….. Using learning outcomes NOT about subjectivity – expertise, tacit knowledge etc How do students know what to aim for? How do novice lecturers know about standards? How can we demonstrate consistency, transparency etc?
29
Example First, rewrite the outcome: Redesigned:
“By the end of this module students will understand the importance of post-renaissance European art in the context of art history” Redesigned: By the end of this module students will be able to: Evaluate and criticise post-renaissance European art within its historical context Date and identify key works of this specific period Demonstrate an understanding of the particular art-historical debates that have taken place about this period Show ability to argue why this particular place and time raise interesting issues about the discipline as a whole University of Sussex
30
Then, use a rubric Also called grading criteria or scoring guide
A set of guidelines for marking or scoring Can be a list, chart, or guidelines They state all dimensions being assessed They contain a scale They assist the marker on rating assessments on the scale
31
Rubrics - 3 Types Checklists Rating Scales Holistic Scoring Guide
Indicating list of criteria Rating Scales Checklist with rating scale added Show degrees by which students meet criteria Holistic Scoring Guide Used where assignments can vary i.e. projects Narrative descriptions of characteristics of different grades of work Not list of criteria
32
Rubric Design Criteria Achievement Levels Objective 1 Objective 2
Excellent Good Needs Work Not acceptable Objective 1 Accepted Minor Major Rejected revision revision Objective 2 Expert Advanced Intermediate Novice Objective 3
33
Simple Checklist Rubric
34
Rubric is for a written Business Assignment
35
This assignment asked students to take a position on a debateable issue regarding interpretation of literature they had studied. The lecturer has identified 3 major criteria – Position, Support and Acknowledgement of Alternative Points of View and has weighted them different levels of attainment of each criterion. Opposite is the detailed rubric for the Position criterion.
36
In Summary Need to write learning outcomes so that they can be demonstrated and assessed Need to identify assessment criteria and appropriate assessment methods Need to be sure exactly what it is students need to demonstrate Making the tacit explicit – Clearly written outcomes and the use of rubrics to articulate achievement
37
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.