1. March 23, 2010 Enrollment Committee Update Facilities & Governmental Relations Joe Dixon, Assistant Superintendent Jessica Mears, Facilities Planner Darryl Taylor, Facilities Planner Board of Education Audrey Yamagata-Noji, Ph.D., President Rob Richardson, Vice President José Alfredo Hernández, J.D., Clerk John Palacio, Member Roman Reyna, Member Jane A. Russo, Superintendent

2. 22 October 27 th BOE meeting - Discussion item January 19 Special Study Session –Approval of Committee formation and composition Background / Recap

3. 3  Deputy Supt. - Dr. Cathie Olsky (Tony Wold backup)  Human Resources – Chad Hammit  Elem. Ed. – Asst. Supt. Herman Mendez  Secondary Ed. – Asst. Supt. Alex Ayala  Elementary Principal – Manuel Fuentes Esqueda Elementary  Intermediate Principal – Jeff Bishop Sierra Intermediate  High Principal – Greg Rankin Godinez Fundamental High Committee Composition  Special Education – Diane Blevins  3 SAEA Representatives for Teachers  3 CSEA Representatives for Classified Staff  9 Parents

4. 4 February 11 th – Purpose, roles, responsibilities, and background March 4 th – K-6 Analysis, Part 1 March 11 th – K-6 Analysis, Part 2 Next meeting March 25 th – K-6 discussion, Part 3 Committee Meetings

5. 55 February 11 th Meeting Committee Background Enrollment Committee Purpose and Process Study Area Zones Density Maps Boundary Maps Classroom Utilization Measure G Projects Enrollment Projections Physical Constraints Walking Distances Grade Level Configurations

6. 6 March 4 th Meeting Staff K-6 Discussion Lunch schedules PE schedules Restrooms Parking & student drop-off Acreage / density Current / planned P2P projects Fundamental lottery Intermediate sites’ excess capacity Transition support Additional staff may be required = additional cost Impact to K-6 schools – students leave mid-year (ex. Taft)

7. 7 March 4 th Meeting Committee’s Input What’s the impact on QEIA schools What’s the impact on test scores, curriculum, & textbooks What’s the impact on non-instructional/specialized spaces, e.g. music rooms, parent support, etc. What’s the impact on special ed. & preschool programs Cluster 6 th graders Larger elementaries = more discipline problems Best to wait until Measure G completed? Temporary/abrupt changes are disruptive for students & staff; make sure we’re looking long-range Is it equitable to implement K-6 only at some schools? There will always be a transition point so quality of instruction should be the key decision factor Would help retain students for an additional year that might otherwise leave the district (i.e. Santiago)

8. 88 March 11 th Meeting K – 6 Analysis Classroom capacity Measure G projects Enrollment projections Parent surveys Neighboring district comparison Considerations: staffing impacts, restrooms, parking, lunch schedules, fundamental lottery, etc. Feasibility: districtwide vs. site specific

9. 9 Parent Surveys 9 K-6 Configuration Districtwide for 3 Years Elementary School Current 5th Grade Enrollment Average 6th Grade Enrollment # of CRs Required # Empty CRs Current Feasibility? Portables Required to Implement Number of Lunch Periods Sites able to Accommodate Additional Lunch Adequate Parking Need for Additional Restrooms Carr Adams839030N33No Yes Diamond939943N13NoYesNo Harvey657035Y02NoYesNo King11412955Y04YesNoYes Martin9811452N34NoYesNo Sepulveda667436Y03NoYesNo Lathrop Edison10410552N33NoNo ParkingYes Franklin847530N33NoNo ParkingYes Kennedy11912355Y03No Lowell14013955Y05Yes No Madison13813059Y04Yes No Pio Pico10311144Y05No Yes McFadden Esqueda132 43N13Yes No Greenville16916154N13Yes Jefferson13215055Y04YesNoYes Monroe667633Y03NoYesNo Thorpe Fundamental13614054N13Yes Washington185166510Y05YesNo

10. 10 Parent Surveys 10 K-6 Configuration Districtwide for 3 Years - cont’d Elementary School Current 5th Grade Enrollment Average 6th Grade Enrollment # of CRs Required # Empty CRs Current Feasibility? Portables Required to Implement Number of Lunch Periods Sites able to Accommodate Additional Lunch Adequate Parking Need for Additional Restrooms Sierra Davis8810940N43No Yes Garfield10310043N13No Yes Hoover887731N23NoYesNo Muir Fundamental129134510Y04YesNo Remington655923Y02NoYesNo Roosevelt10813255Y03YesNo Walker959630N33No Spurgeon Fremont14013140N43YesNo ParkingYes Jackson16616566Y04Yes No Lincoln15618266Y04YesNo Monte Vista96 30N34No Yes Romero-Cruz (4-5)13513744Y02Yes Willard Heninger10211644Y03No Yes Heroes929331N25NoYesNo Santiago13614055Y03Yes No Wilson10110740N43NoYesNo Total 3,8273,958137123 18 (Yes) /16 (No)37 15(Yes) /19 (No) 17 (Yes) /17 (No) 14 (Yes) / 20 (No)

11. 11 Carr Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders 5011626112517 Feasible Feeders 285162613417 Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Adams 6094634728N Diamond 8597578675N Esqueda 151149001014N Martin 55114728842N Monte Vista 7094678772N Harvey 5558436494Y Jackson 4117010871257Y King 50120823943Y Sepulveda 5559450509Y Washington 151619901151Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 5

12. 12 Lathrop Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders 404131290815 Feasible Feeders 230131210827 Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Edison 7797685782N Esqueda 361149001014N Franklin 6168429497N Martin 24114728842N Walker 3296580676N Kennedy 20118774892Y Lowell 12115859974Y Madison 651359101045Y Pio Pico 77110700810Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 4

13. 13 McFadden Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders 4181508109010 Feasible Feeders 59150814498 Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Adams 1094634728N Diamond 597578675N Esqueda 441149001014N Jefferson 1491669771143Y Monroe 5272462534Y Sepulveda 859450509Y Taft 3562n/a797Y Washington 1151619901151Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 5

14. 14 Sierra Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders 30190760613 Feasible Feeders 1799077286 Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Davis 59118702820N Garfield 64102685787N Hoover 5664528592N Walker 1596580676N Kennedy 41118774892Y Remington 1861337398Y Roosevelt 48123833956Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 3

15. 15 Spurgeon Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders 385123184618 Feasible Feeders 1041231112713 Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Fremont 77124850974N Monte Vista 2794678772N Jackson 11117010871257Y King 8120823943Y Lincoln 12120110601261Y Romero-Cruz 41136280416Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 4

16. 16 Willard Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders 30896065214 Feasible Feeders 1589608027 Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Heroes 8687677764N Wilson 72103670773N Heninger 48108799907Y Lowell 42115859974Y Romero-Cruz 32136280416Y Roosevelt 19123833956Y Santiago 9134851985Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 5

17. Board of Education Direction Next Steps 17