1. Division of Korea and Germany

2. Korean War, 1950-1953: the course of events Korea was divided into two zones of occupation –Soviet in the north part with Kim Il – Sung (Ким Ир Сен) and American in the south part with Syngman Rhee (Ли Сы Ман); Similar to Germany: unification is possible but in own terms of superpowers. Nobody took into consideration an local opinion 1947-Truman proposed to Stalin: “Let’s arrange the elections” (There were more population in the south); and Stalin – let’s withdraw the troops (there were more arms in the North) Since 1949 the clashes between zones were started, and it was clear that the zones would seek the unification on their terms.

3. Documents evidence about Stalin’s position as to the unification of Korea The meeting with Kim in Moscow, March 1949: Kim was asking for military aid, but Stalin avoided the answer. February 1950 – Stalin met Mao Zedung in Moscow and they established the alliance; however, Stalin did not trust Mao. and in 1950 Stalin wrote to the Soviet ambassador: “...I understand the dissatisfaction of...Kim..., but he must understand that such a large matter in regard to South Korea....must be organized so that there would not be too great risk.... Literature: Did Russia participated? until 1990s – yes, today – no, but Stalin’ encouragement was a contribution to this war + equipment

4. The significance of the Korean War What was happened in June 1950 was the first hot war of the Cold War; It was signalized that the East-West tension is deep and permanent; It has demonstrated to the Soviet Union that the USA was ready to fight against the Soviet expansion in all, even insignificant (strategically) parts of the world; The both sides were ready to be involved in a war against each other;

5. 1950: containment policy January 1950 – Truman asked to revise the military budget and reexamine the national strategy of the US Nitze and Acheson drafted several ideas how to find convincing foundations for increasing the budget as the NSC policy papers >> NSC 68/3 – there is a threat from USSR >> we need a high military budget for containment of the USSR

6. German question: from friendly to hostile division

8. What is “German question” in the reality of 1950s 1.During the 2 WW and during the initial cold war context: How to divide and create new a weak, agrarian, demilitarized Germany>> The Big Three – created the discourse about 1) “Zones”, 2) reparations 3) democratization of “Zones” + 4) high authority and free hands of zonal military administration.

9. What is “German question”? 2. In historiography: It is process of finding the answers on the following questions: –Why the allies could not unify Germany or why they did not want to do it? –Who was responsible for the long division of nation? >>

10. German question: the turning points, 1943-61 I) 1943-45: The idea to divide and to weaken (Tehran conference) was suitable for both Soviets ad Americans: –Stalin – to prevent a new aggression –Roosevelt – to give Germans a lesson Dissent voices: –Moscow: European Advising Commission, London: a Soviet draft of unification after short period of democratization by the Allied Control Council, 1944 –Washington: Department of States: to integrate Germany in West world Potsdam conference, August 1945: –Soviet demands for huge reparations will be later against Marshal plan; –Too much authority was attributed to the Zonal military administrations; –Indefinite words about future unification.

11. German question: the turning points, 1943-61 II) 1945-1946: the chances for unification have been lost: Zones with independent administrations, where own, uncoordinated reforms were imposed Development and reinforcing the political parties >> communists\social-democrats Absent of a native German government like it was in Japan; Soviet high demands reparations from American Zone; James Burns’ speech about development of the democracy in One Zone. Now in literature: Stalin was ready to change the implantation of the Western style of the democracy in East Part for getting huge reparations from the West Zones + Stalin was against to build a socialism in the Zone until 1952

12. German question: the turning points, 1943-61 III) 1947-1949: Marshal Plan and European economic integration became against Soviet reparations received from the West Zone >> to keep own Zones Bizone- unification of British and American zones and independent currency reform, 1947-1948 and Trizone >> West German federal state European military alliance with the U.S. became against demilitarizating and weakening Germany >> to keep own Zone As s result, the currency reform in Western parts of Germany, + and Berlin blockade, 1948-1949 >> The edge of American-Soviet war in Germany. “A disintegrated atom created a divided Germany” Formal establishment of FRG and GDR, 1949

13. German question: the turning points, 1943-61 IV) 1950-52 Domestic affairs in two parts: positive economic development against economical crisis; Strong democratic parties against unpopular communist parties >> Stalin’ diplomatic note, March 12, 1952 : –This is letter + a draft of German Peace Treaty; –Neutrality and unification with withdrawal of all military forces.>> Answer of the West: April 2, 1952 –Referendum for neutrality and unification –Independent elections –USA were not ready to unify Germany, because W. Germany had became a part of north-Atlantic defense system;

14. Two citations from documents Note as a Soviet draft for German Peace Treaty: “….Germany is re-established as a unified state, all armed forces must be withdrawn…” Department of States memorandum about potential German Unification: “the U. S. is likely to unify Germany as a part of European Defense Community, and we should avoid the talks with the Soviet Union…”

15. German question: the turning points, 1943-61 IV) 1950-52 A meeting with the German communists, April 1952 –Stalin pushed them to build a socialist state Problem in historiography: generous step or propaganda? –No answer. –Two opinions: Stalin was afraid of West Germany as a member of a new West military alliance >> any Germany, but neutral Germany was suitable for him A pure bluff

16. German question: the turning points, 1943-61 V) 1953-1961: the rejection to unify Germany, because all participants were interested in keeping what they have obtained New concept elaborated by the Soviet leadership - German question is not international problem but it is the question of German people >> Berlin crisis 1958 -1961: –Khrushchev’s ultimatum: to start talks about peace treaty with Germany and Free Berlin; –Khrushchev built the wall during one night, august 1961 –From 1961 Soviet Union began process of building the socialist society in GDR. –1964: the Treaty with East Germany

17. What is “German question”: historiography ANSWERS: 1)Concept of complete impossibility to resolve the GQ 2)Concept of untapped (missed) chances 3)Responsibility approach Shared points of view: 1) The Big Three did not elaborate the acceptable political formula and mechanism how to unify the Zones before Marshal plan, 1947 and Blockade of Berlin, 1948; 2) The Soviet leadership should not blamed alone for the division, because its activity was more consistent to the previous agreements, but the West initiated new politics like EU, Marshal Plan, NATO with including Trizone.

18. Homework Analysis of documents: reading and questions File “ Documents_2”

19. Final assessment of the Cold War Origins 3 major interpretations regarding the origins of the Cold War: 1) the orthodox interpretation - a responsibility for the breakdown of the wartime Grand Alliance to the Soviet Union: Stalin expanded communism in Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East, and The U.S. had no choice but to check Soviet expansionism. So, ideological clash Soviet historians - the United States exaggerated any threat the Soviet Union may have posed to the United States at the end of World War

20. 1 famous alternative view in orthodox: Hans Morgenthau and Arthur Schlesinger Jr. traditional goals of Russian expansionism, rather than communist ideology, was premises for the Cold War; Americans failed to appreciate the nature of Stalin's ambitions, and the Soviets could not understand the cause of American sensitivity. >> the Cold Wary was the product of mutual misunderstanding. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., and Hans J. Morgenthau, The Origins of the Cold War (1970)

21. Final assessment of the Cold War Origins 2) Revisionist (Gabriel Kolko): Economic factor - the Truman administration supported for a interventionist strategy designed to make the world safe for American capitalism: global open door policy of equal trade, investment opportunity, private enterprise, multilateral cooperation in foreign commerce freedom of the seas

22. Final assessment of the Cold War Origins: revisionists The Soviet Union: did not want to subordinate its economic system Losing control in countries with strong communist parties resulted in American support of conservative establishments. Gabriel Kolko and Joyce Kolko, The Limits of Power: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1945-1954 (1972)

23. Final assessment of the Cold War Origins 3) post-revisionism (John Gaddis): both internal and external influences important in explaining the breakdown of the Grand Alliance: domestic politics, bureaucracy, personality, specific perceptions of Soviet intentions

24. Final conclusion of N. Tsvetkova ideological differences are insufficient to explain the Cold War after World War II Soviet and American interests now collided as both nations attempted to fill the power vacuum created by the collapse of Germany and Japan: Europe, Asia Misunderstanding: Russian political expansionism cannot understand American global economic policy