1. Syllabification of American English David Eddington (BYU) Dirk Elzinga (BYU) Rebecca Treiman (WU) Mark Davies (BYU) Brigham Young University and Washington University

2. We are NOT interested in: Devising prescriptive rules of syllabification How clever linguists syllabify words Syllabification of the written word

3. We ARE interested in: Describing how actual speakers syllabify Syllabification based on sounds not spelling

4. Don’t we know how English is syllabified already? Dictionaries often disagree in their phonetic transcription (e.g. silly, hollow, balance) –Merriam Webstersi. lly ho. llow ba. lance –Cambridgesill. y ho. llow or holl. ow bal. ance

5. Previous empirical studies (Derwing 1992; Derwing and Neary 1991; Fallows 1981; Treiman, Bowey, and Bourassa 2002; Treiman and Danis 1988; Treiman, Gross, and Cwikiel-Glavin 1992; Treiman, Staub, and Lavery 1994; Treiman and Zukowski 1990; Zamuner and Ohala 1999) Focused principally on bisyllabic words with one medial consonant (e.g. lemon) Considered mainly monomorphemic words such as about not polymorphemic words such as lightly (light + ly) Used only 20-40 test words

6. Findings of previous studies Stress attracts the medial consonant –lémon > lém. on –attáck > a. ttáck

7. Findings of previous studies Initial lax vowels attract the consonant to the coda of the first syllable –letter > lett. er Initial tense vowels repel the consonant into the onset of the second syllable –laser > la. ser

8. Findings of previous studies Sonorants are attracted to the coda of the first syllable –silly > sill. y

9. Findings of previous studies Sonorants are attracted to the coda of the first syllable –silly > sill. y Obstruents are pushed into the onset of the second syllable –aghast > a. ghast

10. Problem Vowel quality, stress, and medial consonants interact with each other and must be considered together Other factors may influence as well

11. Our innovations We considered: –Words with 1-4 medial consonants –Both monomorphemic and polymorphemic words –The syllabification of many words –Legality of consonants word initially and finally –Types of morpheme boundaries

12. BYU Syllabification Survey 5,000 bisyllabic test items 841 participants average of 22 responses per test word survey completed online choices based on sounds not spelling

13. BYU Syllabification Survey Choose the syllabification of ‘victim’ that sounds best to you –VI / KTUHM –VIK / TUHM –VIKT / UHM – I’m not sure

14. BYU syllabification survey Factors we considered: –Vowel quality (tense or lax) –Medial consonant quality (nasal, liquid, obstruent, etc.) –Morphological boundaries Compound word (sheepdog) Transparent (actor) Opaque (fifteen) –Stress placement –Legality of consonants word initially and finally

15. BYU syllabification survey This is a work in progress –We may consider other factors –Statistical analysis still underway (interactions)

16. Interpreting Results C O N S T A N T V1 C1 C2 C3 V2

17. Interpreting Results Multiple regression performed Only p <.05 results discussed I’ll avoid numbers and focus on interpretation of them instead

18. Results for VCV Words 60% of the variance is accounted for Factors that favor V. CV –C is licit word initially (/b/ versus /Ŋ/ –V1 is tense (able) –C is an obstruent (placard) –A transparent or compound morpheme boundary precedes the consonant (tC, cC; rebirth, lawsuit) Transparent >> compound

19. Results for VCV Words Factors that disfavor V. CV –The word is written with a geminate consonant –The consonant is /r/, /l/, or a nasal –A transparent, compound, or opaque morpheme boundary follows the consonant (Ct, Cc, Co) Compound >> transparent >> opaque (getup, noisy, shadow)

20. Results for VCV Words 60% of the variance is accounted for Factors that favor VC. V –The word contains a geminate consonant –C1 is /l/, /r/, or a nasal –A compound, transparent, or opaque morpheme boundary follows the consonant (Cc, Ct, Co) Compound >> transparent >> opaque (getup, noisy, shadow)

21. Results for VCV Words Factors that disfavor VC. V –V1 is tense –A transparent or compound morpheme boundary precedes the consonant (tC, cC) Transparent >> compound (prewar, seashore)

22. Interactions (monomorphemic) Final StressInitial Stress V.CVVC.V?ExampleV.CVVC.V?Example 8637 Lax86131buffoon62371govern 9086 Tense9082erect86131private

23. Results for VCCV Words 75% of variance accounted for Factors that favor V. CCV syllabification –CC is licit word initially (br- versus *dl-) –C2 is /r/, /l/ or a glide –V1 is tense (council) –Any kind of morpheme boundary precedes CC (+CC) Compound >> transparent >> opaque (seaplane, biplane, supplant)

24. Results for VCCV Words Factors that disfavor V. CCV syllabification –CC is licit word finally –C1 is /r/, /l/, or nasal –Any kind of morpheme boundary appears between CC (C+C) Transparent >> compound >> opaque (subjoin, bloodshed, fifteen) –A compound boundary appears after CC (CCc)

25. Results for VCCV Words 69% of variance accounted for Factors that favor VC. CV syllabification –C1 is /r/, /l/, or nasal –Any kind of morpheme boundary separates the CC (C+C) Compound >> transparent >> opaque (subjoin, bloodshed, fifteen)

26. Results for VCCV Words Factors that disfavor VC. CV syllabification –CC is licit word initially –C2 is /r/, /l/, or a glide –Any kind of morpheme boundary falls before CC (+CC) Transparent >> compound >> opaque –A compound or transparent morpheme boundary falls after CC (CCc, CCo) Compound >> transparent

27. Results for VCCV Words 34% of variance accounted for Factors that favor VCC. V syllabification –CC is licit word finally –A compound or transparent morpheme boundary follows CC (CCc, CCt) Compound >> transparent (handout, actor)

28. Results for VCCV Words Factors that disfavor VCC. V syllabification –CC is licit word initially –C1 is /r/ –A transparent or compound boundary separates CC (CtC, CcC) Compound >> transparent (prewar, myself)

29. Interactions (monomorphemic) Final Stress V.CCVVC.CVV.CCV?Example Lax Licit Onset Clusters762220afflict Illicit Onset Clusters39430vaccine Tense Licit Onset Clusters761735digress Illicit Onset Clusters88652maintain Initial Stress V.CCVVC.CVV.CCV?Example Lax Licit Onset Clusters346051saffron Illicit Onset Clusters48971after Tense Licit Onset Clusters742311program Illicit Onset Clusters108451flounder Largest percentage in each category appears in boldface.

30. Syllabification by cluster Several ways to determine permissibility of CCC –Are all three consonants licit word initially? str- is licit given strange rtr- is illicit *rtrange –Are all three consonants licit word finally? -nst is licit given rinsed -lnm is illicit *talnm –Are the final two consonants licit word initially? nfl- is licit given fling rtl- is illicit *tling –Are the first two consonants licit word finally? -rkr is licit given work -bst is illicit *rabs [bs]

31. Results for VCCCV Words 70% of variance accounted for Factors that favor V. CCCV –CCC is licit word initially (astray) –V1 is tense (cambric) –A compound or transparent boundary precedes CCC (cCCC, tCCC) Compound >> transparent (drawstring, rescript)

32. Results for VCCCV Words Factors that disfavor V. CCCV –The first two consonants of CCC are licit word finally (margrave, masthead) –There is a transparent boundary (CtCC; nonstop)

33. Results of VCCCV Words 77% of the variance accounted for Factors that favor VC. CCV –The last two consonants of CCC are licit word initially (coxcomb, contract) –A compound or transparent boundary occurs CcCC or CtCC Compound >> transparent (outgrow, nonstop)

34. Results of VCCCV Words Factors that disfavor VC. CCV –CCC is licit word initially or finally (bowstring, curtsey) –The first two consonants are licit word finally (talesman) –The following morpheme boundaries cCCC, tCCC, CCcC, CCtC, CCCc

35. Results of VCCCV Words 81% of variance accounted for Factors that favor VCC. CV –The first two consonants are licit word finally (darksome, sixty, empty, sanctum) –The following morpheme boundaries exist: CCcC, CCtC, CCoC, and CCCc (??) (porthole, endless, children, huntsman [ h ʌ nsm ʌ n] )

36. Results of VCCCV Words Factors that disfavor VCC. CV –CCC is licit word initially –Final two consonants are licit word initially –The following morpheme boundaries: CcCC, CtCC, CCCo (outgrow, nonstop, centrist)

37. Results of VCCCV Words 17% of variance accounted for Factors that favor VCCC. V –CCC is licit word finally (monster) –CCCo morpheme boundary (centrist)

38. Results of VCCCV Words Factors that disfavor VCCC. V –tCCC, CcCC, CCcC morpheme boundaries (rescript, outgrow, porthole)

39. Syllabification by cluster Responses tend to break up illicit clusters –por. trait, chand. ler Licit CCC, CC C, and C CC clusters following a tense vowel are kept intact –pro. scribe, pro. scribe, poul. try Licit CCC, CC C, and C CC clusters following a lax vowel favor C.CC even if it breaks a licit cluster –as. tray, res. t(au)rant, pil. grim

40. Results of VCCCCV Words 36% of the variance accounted for Factors that favor V. CCCCV –NONE

41. Results of VCCCCV Words Factors that disfavor V. CCCCV –The first three consonants are licit word finally

42. Results of VCCCCV Words 79% of the variance accounted for Factors that favor VC. CCCV –The final three consonants are licit word initially (abstract)

43. Results of VCCCCV Words Factors that disfavor V. CCCCV –A CCtCC morpheme boundary (transplant)

44. Results of VCCCCV Words 68% of the variance accounted for Factors that favor VCC. CCV –NONE

45. Results of VCCCCV Words Factors that disfavor VCC. CCV –The final three consonants are licit word initially (abstract) –A CCCcC morpheme boundary (marksman, textbook)

46. Results of VCCCCV Words 83% of the variance accounted for Factors that favor VCCC. CV –A CCCcC morpheme boundary (worldwide, swordsman)

47. Results of VCCCCV Words Factors that disfavor VCCC. CV –The final two consonants are licit word initially

48. Result of VCCCCV Words No one syllabified any word VCCCC. V

49. Summary of Results Syllabification was highly influenced by: –Morpheme boundaries –Legality of consonant clusters word initially and finally –V1 quality –Medial consonant quality –Stress –Interactions among these factors