Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Composting Equipment Kevin Barnes City of Bakersfield, CA.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Composting Equipment Kevin Barnes City of Bakersfield, CA."— Presentation transcript:

1 Composting Equipment Kevin Barnes City of Bakersfield, CA

2  Production :  Flexibility to handle Current and Future incoming waste stream needs  Simplicity of Operation/Maintenance:  Easy to Operate, Maintain, and Service  Product Support:  Training for Operators, Maintenance Personnel  Capacity to provide Parts and Service Support quickly and efficiently  Durability:  Productive for an extended period of time with little significant down time  Relationship with the Manufacturer:  Manufacturer understands your business  Shares commitment to help you reach your goals General Equipment Selection Considerations

3  Price:  Price competitive with comparable equipment  Safety:  Safe to operate  Sufficient safety information provided by Manufacturer  Reliability:  Depend on the equipment to be up and running every day  References:  Manufacturer provides you with contacts running similar operations and equipment  Reputation:  Manufacturer regarded within the industry  Word of mouth

4 Principles of Material Handling  Handle it Once  Combine Operations  Eliminate Unnecessary Ones  Use Gravity  Gravity Can Be Your Friend  Work with your Head, NOT Your Back  Mechanize and Automate  Continuous Flow is better than Batch  Efficient Layout is Key to Minimizing work  Move in Straight or Circular Paths  “Never” go back  Don’t Cross Paths  Concentrate on and Remove Bottlenecks  Minimize Distance Traveled  Remove People from Hazards

5 Loading / Material Handling  Forming Windrows  Turning Windrows (Bad Plan)  Mixing  Batching  Loading Trucks  Loading Screen  Moving Materials  Typical Options  Light Material Buckets  High Tip Buckets  Grapples  Booms

6 Basic Composting Equipment Categories  Pre - Process Equipment  Feedstock Preparation  Process Equipment  Creating a Product  Post Process Equipment  Preparing Product for Market

7 Pre-Process (Feedstock Preparation)  Weighing Equipment  Sizing Equipment  Mixing Equipment  Loading / Material Handling Equipment

8 Weighing Equipment Weight Scales  Needed for:  Billing  Tracking Materials  Inventory Control  Scale Types  Pit Scales  Most Common  Platform Scales  Preferred  Less maintenance

9 Size Reduction Selection Considerations  Determine your Goals  Volume Reduction Only  Component in Total Recycling System  Type of Material to be Processed  Quantity of Material to be Processed  How quickly do you need it Processed  Markets for End-Products  Equipment Budget  Operating Conditions  Mobile or Stationary Operation  Market Reliability  Serviceability

10 Size Reduction Grinder Types  High Speed / Low Torque  Tub Grinders  Horizontal Grinders  Chippers  Slow Speed / High Torque  Shredders

11 Size Reduction Tub Grinders  PROS  High Mobility  Tracks or Tires  Less Expensive to Purchase  High Throughput  Best for Heavy, Large Diameter Material  Stumps, Root Balls  CONS  Safety Concerns (Throwing)  Location Concerns  Lengthy, Lighter Materials Difficult to Feed  Loading often Requires Tedious Material Placement and Manipulation

12 Size Reduction Horizontal Grinders  PROS  High Mobility  Tracks or Tires  Safer Operation  Handles Longer, Lighter, Brushier Material  Better Feed Rate Control  Lower Feed Height  Good on Yard Waste  CONS  More Expensive to Purchase  Material Diameter Limitations  Poor Fuel Economy

13 Size Reduction Chippers  PROS  PTO or Self Powered  Safer  Handles longer material  Consistent product  Good for bulking material  CONS More Expensive to Purchase Poor Fuel Efficiency Most Require Additional Equipment

14 Size Reduction Slow Speed-High Torque (Shredder)  PROS  Best Fuel Economy  Less Stress on Engine  Less Maintenance  More Shearing  Good for First Pass  Handles Wide Variety of Materials  Green Waste, Tires, White goods, etc.  Good for Bulking Material  Good for C&D waste  Good for Stumps  CONS  More Expensive to Purchase  Slower but Productive

15 Mixing Equipment  Types  Mobile  Stationary  Vertical Shaft  Horizontal Shaft  Power  PTO Driven  Diesel  Electrical  Consistent Mixing of Feed Stocks  Can Include Scales

16 Mixing Equipment  Mobile Mixer  Used for Material Transport  Can be used to Build Windrows  Trailer  PTO tractor driven  Truck Mounted  Additional Truck Cost Trailer-Vertical Shaft Truck Mounted-Horizontal Shaft Truck Mounted Horizontal

17 Mixing Equipment  Stationary Mixer  Heavy duty  Large capacity  Batch/Continuous  Electric or Diesel power

18 Process Equipment  Compost Turners  Moisture Addition Equipment  Windrow Covers  Monitoring Equipment

19 Compost Turners Turner Selection Considerations  Material Composition  Quantity of Material  Overall Material Flow  Pad Conditions  Pad Layout / Utilization  Turner / Windrow Size  Turner Capacity  Machine Cost Considerations  Total Cost to Operate  Cost / yd³ of material turned  Availability of Optional Equipment  Market Reliability  Serviceability

20 Compost Turners  Turner Types  Pull / Tow Behind  Elevating Face  Trapezoidal  Self Propelled Windrow  Available Options  Walled / Tunnel

21 Compost Turners Pull / Tow Behind  PROS  PTO or Self Propelled  Minimal Moving Parts  Small Scale Composting or “Start Up” Operation  Lower Cost to Purchase  CONS  Requires Additional Tow Vehicle  Lower Throughputs  Access Isles Required for Tow Vehicle  Less Efficient Pad Utilization

22 Compost Turners Elevating Face (Windrows)  PROS  Tow Behind or Self Propelled  Tracks or Tires  Can be used with side-discharge to move extended trapezoidal piles  CONS  Turns ½ Windrow with Each Pass  Access Isles Required  Less Homogenization  Inefficient Pad Utilization  Many, Many Moving Parts  High Maintenance

23 Compost Turners Trapezoidal  PROS  Self Propelled  Tracks or Tires  Removes Face and Transposes  Access Isles Not Required  CONS  Less Air-More Bulking Required  More Frequent Tuning Required  Slower Turnover / Process

24 Compost Turners Self Propelled Windrow  PROS  Tracks or Tires  Space Requirements Vary by Mfg.  More Air from Natural Convection  Turn Complete Windrow in a Single Pass  Moisture Addition Possible  Greater Process Control  Greater Flexibility  CONS  ???

25 Windrow Turner Available Options Side Transposing Conveyor Tarp Covering Elevating Cabin Automated hose Reel

26 Compost Turners Walled / Tunnel  PROS  Indoor / Outdoor  Reduced Odors / Emissions  Fully Automatic  Batch / Process Operation  Electric / Diesel  CONS  Typically part of a Complete System  More Expensive to Purchase

27 Moisture Addition Moisture Addition Methods  Tank  Hydrant Systems  Automated hose reel

28 Windrow Covers  Odor Control  Heat Retention  Colder Climates  Moisture Retention  Storm Water Runoff Management  Vector Control

29 Monitoring Equipment Probes  Temperature  Digital  Analog  Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide  Data Logging  Thermal Coupler

30 Monitoring Equipment Temperature Probes  Data Logging  Record Keeping

31 Monitoring Equipment Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide Probes  Analog  Digital  Data Logging  $50.00-$4,000 Fyrite CO 2 Meter Windrow Manager-Probe-Temp & O 2 Demista-Temp & O 2 Meter

32 Monitoring Equipment Windrow Management  Helps keep Regulators Happy  Reduce Production Costs  Increase Throughput  Improve Product Quality

33 Screening Equipment Screen Selection Considerations  Type(s) of Material to be Screened  Quantity of Material to be Screened  Desired Fractional “fines” Size(s)  Number of Fractional Sizes Required  Screening Plan  Take Screen to the Material or Material to the Screen  Moisture Level of Material to be Screened  Consideration for “bad weather” Days  Mobility Requirements  Fuel Consumption  Actual Cost / yd³ of screened material to operate  Market Reliability  Serviceability

34 Post Process Equipment  Screens  Shaker Deck  Trommel  Star Deck  Pneumatic Separation Trommel Shaker deck Star deck

35 Screening Equipment How does a Shaker Deck Work?  Material loaded into hopper  Hopper feeds unscreened material onto a vibrating bed  Vibrating Bed has openings designed to size material to a desired fraction  Screened Material “fines” drop through the bed openings and are either transported out of the screen, or rescreened to produce a finer fraction  Oversized Material “Overs” pass over the bed and out the screen

36 Screening Equipment Shaker Deck  PROS  Mobile or Stationary  Tracks or Tires  Less Expensive to Purchase  CONS  Clogs easily with moist material  Lower production  Noisy  Many Moving Parts

37 Screening Equipment How does a Trommel Screen Work?  Material loaded into hopper  Hopper feeds unscreened material into the Rotating Drum  Rotating Drum has openings designed to properly size material to a desired fraction  Screened material “fines” drop through the drum openings and are transported out of the screen  Over sized material “Overs” pass out through the drum and out the screen

38 Screening Equipment Trommel Screens  PROS  Mobile or Stationary  Tracks or Tires  Cleaning Brushes  Simple Operation  Good Production  Generally Clean Product  Widely Used  CONS:  Must Change Screening Drum to vary Fractional Size  As Moisture Increases, Production Decreases

39 Screening Equipment How does a Star Screen Work?  Material loaded into hopper  Hopper feeds unscreened material onto a bed of rotating stars  The Size, Spacing, and Speed of the rotating stars determines fractional output.  Screened material “fines” drop through the stars and are transported out of the screen  Over sized material “Overs” pass over the star deck and out the screen

40 Screening Equipment Star Deck (Star Screens)  PROS  Mobile or Stationary  Tracks, Tires, or Track/Tire Combination  Fines Size can be varied by Changing Star Rotation Speed  Self Cleaning Options  Excellent for High Moisture Materials  Highest Production  CONS  Many Moving Parts

41 Pneumatic Separation  Plastic Removal

42 Bagging Equipment  Mobile Bagger  Stationary Bagger

43 Feedstock receipt Active Composting Curing Screening Storage and packing Feedstock preparation, mixing Odor control Dust control Monitoring Product analysis Non-compostables Recycle or dispose Collect Feedstocks Product sales, distribution and use “Overs” Collect Feedstocks 1 st Stage2nd Stage Flow of materials and activities at the compost facility Compost facility activities Recycle or dispose? Water management


Download ppt "Composting Equipment Kevin Barnes City of Bakersfield, CA."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google