Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byArmando Bickford Modified over 2 years ago

1
“The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence II: The interaction of the planet with the disc” Papaloizou & Nelson 2003, MNRAS 339 (4), 993 Brian Gleim March 23rd, 2006 AST 591 Instructor: Rolf Jansen

2
Introduction n Discovery of giant planets close to their star has led to the idea that they migrated inwards due to gravitational interaction with the gaseous disc

3
Causes of Migration n Standard picture involves torques between a laminar viscous disc and a Jovian protoplanet exciting spiral waves, producing an inward migration n Massive protoplanet can open an annular gap in disc n Form of gap & gas accretion rate: function of visc., planet mass, height

4
Causes of Migration n Protoplanet orbits in gap, interacts with outer disc n Leads to inward migration ~10 5 yr n Balbus & Hawley (1991): angular momentum transport, inward migration also originates from magnetorotational instability (MRI)

5
Paper I: Turbulent Discs n Focused on turbulent disc models prior to introducing a perturbing protoplanet n Cylindrical disc models; no vertical stratification n Assume disc is adequately ionized for ideal MHD conditions; consider models with no net magnetic flux n Now on to planet-disc interaction...

6
Planet-Disc Model n From paper I: H/r = 0.1 Stress Parameter = 5x10 -3 Stress Parameter = 5x10 -3 n Stellar Mass = 1 M solar n Planet Mass must be >3 Jupiter masses: consider 5 M Jupiter n Thinner discs and less massive planets are more desirable: H/r = 0.05 /1 M Jupiter n Both are computationally impossible now

7
Initial Model Setup

8
Protoplanet Model n Modeled as Hill sphere @ r = 2.2 n Roche lobe atmosphere around planet before gap construction complete n Not accretion directly onto planet

9
Protoplanet Model n Nelson et al. (2000): matter accretes from atmosphere onto planet n Cannot simulate that here: effect on mag. field difficult n Atmosphere gains matter, not planet

10
Another Problem n Directly imbedding planet into disc produces no gap n N&P carve out small gap @ r = 2.2 n Justifed because magnetic energy and stress remain same

11
Numerical Results n Continuity Eq. for disc surface density: n Equation of Motion: n Indentical to Viscous Disc Theory

12
Time Evolution of Model n Simulation ran for 100 planetary orbits n Initial gap deepened n Accretion onto central parts produced something like central cavity

13
Time Evolution of Model n Magnetic Energy value maintained throughout simulation n Protoplanetary perturbations do not have strong global effect on the dynamo

14
Time Evolution of Model n However, planet effects turbulence locally n Planet creates an ordered field where material passes through spiral shocks

15
Protoplanet in Disc Gap

16
Magnetic Field in Disc Gap

17
Stress Parameter vs. Time n Magnetic stress is same as without the planet n Total stress peaks due to spiral waves launched by protoplanet

18
Stress vs. Radius n Total stress and magnetic component become large around planet n Further out, value is similar to disc w/o planet

19
Angular Momentum Flux n High Reynolds stress immediately outside gap n High Magnetic stress at large radii n Magnetic stress is non-zero through gap, transferring L without tidal torque

20
Angular Momentum Flux n Flux Profile at later time: n Same characteristics: stable pattern of behavior has been established quickly n Inward migration results ~10 4 orbits

21
Turbulent vs. Viscous Disc n Spiral waves ‘sharper’ in viscous disc

22
Turbulent vs. Viscous Disc n Little circular flow around protoplanet n Turbulence could effect accretion rate

23
Turbulent vs. Viscous Disc Turbulent disc appears to have smaller stress parameter Turbulent disc appears to have smaller stress parameter n Could be artifact of simulation OR magnetic communication across the gap

24
Conclusions n Demonstrated many of phenomena seen in laminar viscous disc n Planet launched spiral waves that transport angular momentum Turbulent disc has smaller Turbulent disc has smaller –Mag. fields transport L across the gap n Magnetic breaking around planet –Might slow mass accretion rate

25
References n “The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence II: The interaction of the planet with the disc” Papaloizou & Nelson 2003, MNRAS 339 (4), 993-1005 n “The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence I: The initial turbulent disc models” Papaloizou & Nelson 2003a, MNRAS 339, 923 n Images from: –http://astron.berkeley.edu/~gmarcy/0398marcybox4.html –http://www.sns.ias.edu/~dejan/CCS/work/SciArt/

Similar presentations

OK

Non-symetrical Protoplanetary Disks Annibal Hetem Jr. (FAFIL/FSA) Jane Gregorio-Hetem (IAG/USP)

Non-symetrical Protoplanetary Disks Annibal Hetem Jr. (FAFIL/FSA) Jane Gregorio-Hetem (IAG/USP)

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on congruent triangles for class 9 Ppt on renewable energy and environment protection Ppt on waxes structure Ppt on asymptotic notation of algorithms book Ppt on latest gadgets in market Ppt on condition monitoring solutions Topics for ppt on environmental problems Ppt on ms project 2007 Ppt on airport site selection Ppt on models of marketing communication