Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byEllie Eley Modified over 2 years ago

1
“The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence I: The initial turbulent disc models” Papaloizou & Nelson 2003a, MNRAS 339, 923 Brian Gleim February 23rd, 2006 AST 591 Instructor: Rolf Jansen

2
Introduction n Discovery of giant planets close to their star has led to the idea that they migrated inwards due to gravitational interaction with the gaseous disc

3
Causes of Migration n Previous studies involving torques between a laminar viscous disc and a Jovian protoplanet produces an inward migration n Balbus & Hawley (1991): inward migration originates from magnetorotational instability (MRI)

4
Paper I: Turbulent Discs n Focus on turbulent disc models prior to introducing a perturbing protoplanet (Paper II) n Cylindrical disc models; no vertical stratification n Assume disc is adequately ionized for idea MHD conditions; consider models with no net magnetic flux

5
Initial Model Setup

6
Models A-E Range from r 1

7
Important Quantities n Magnetic Energy –=> MRI Stress Parameter α Stress Parameter α –=> Ang. Mom. transfer n Radial Fluid Velocity –=> Inward Migration

8
Model A n Input Moderate Values n At onset of MRI, high initial magnetic energy before relaxation n Stable stress pattern after short time n Radial velocity takes much longer to stability

9
Model B n Short radius r 2 = 4.0 n Similar results to Model A n Stress Parameter results were initially nonsensical

10
Models C & D n 50% Thicker discs n Typical magnetic energy Time averages of α are more uniform: may occur because thicker disc loses memory of ini. cond. and relaxes faster Time averages of α are more uniform: may occur because thicker disc loses memory of ini. cond. and relaxes faster

11
Model E n Long radius r 2 = 8.0 Similar saturation results for α and magnetic energy This model was built to azimuth = 2 to simulate planet-disc interactions

12
Full 2 Disc n To simulate full disc, transform inertial frame into rotating frame n Would the simulation results change? n No, magnetic energy and stress parameter trends remain

13
Discussion n All models attain a turbulent state: –α ~ 5x10 -3 and –β -1 ~.001 –Same results for 2 azimuth –Same for rotational frame

14
Comparison with Theory n Radial velocity results up to 2 orders of magnitude larger than classical viscous disc theory expects n Long duration time-averages required to reveal magnitudes comparable to theoretical viscous inflow velocity

15
With a Protoplanet? n Expect different dynamic behavior in the gap region n Instantaneous velocity fluctuations too great n Classic theory only applies in quasi- steady regions

16
References n “The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence I: The initial turbulent disc models” Papaloizou & Nelson 2003a, MNRAS 339, 923 n Images from: –http://astron.berkeley.edu/~gmarcy/0398 marcybox4.html –http://www.astro.livjm.ac.uk/research/hots tars.shtml –http://www.sns.ias.edu/~dejan/CCS/work/ SciArt/

Similar presentations

OK

Magnetized (“ real ”) Accretion Flows Roman Shcherbakov, 5 December, 2007.

Magnetized (“ real ”) Accretion Flows Roman Shcherbakov, 5 December, 2007.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on upcoming technologies in computer science Ppt on types of charts in ms excel Ppt on amplitude shift keying applications Ppt on indian musical instruments Doc convert to ppt online training Ppt on two point perspective city Ppt on 5 electrical appliances Ppt on i love u virus Ppt on machine translation service Ppt on latest technology in computer science