Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait. and Better Software magazine presents… Avoid Throwaway Test Automation Sponsored by Cognizant Non-streaming participants should call 1-866-761-8643.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: " and Better Software magazine presents… Avoid Throwaway Test Automation Sponsored by Cognizant Non-streaming participants should call 1-866-761-8643."— Presentation transcript:

1 and Better Software magazine presents… Avoid Throwaway Test Automation Sponsored by Cognizant Non-streaming participants should call 1-866-761-8643 International Non-streaming participants should call 1-904-596-2362

2 Setting the Context What we mean by “automated testing” Other types of tool-assisted testing Principles will apply to other types Many topics deserve more attention Automated testing is software development

3 What Typically Goes Wrong Create automated tests that don’t run anymore Spending too much time babysitting and maintaining the automation Automated tests are too brittle Tools don’t work in environment Automated tests not providing value

4 Common Mistakes No plan for implementation No buy-in from staff or management No training for automators No time allotted to automate No time allotted for maintenance No framework for reusability Good intentions, poor execution

5 Why Automate?  Sounds cool  Boss said so  Can’t keep up Lots of repetitive tests Lots of data driven tests Reduce time spent on regression testing

6 Develop an Automation Plan Why you will automate What to automate When to automate Who will automate, execute, maintain How to automate – Framework How to report results Where to run tests

7 What to automate Smoke tests Repetitive tests Can run autonomously Big risks Take less time to automate than execute  Should run 3-5 times without changing Data intensive tests

8 When to automate When you’re ready Depends on development lifecycle  Waterfall – may wait until the end  Agile – may need continuous automation Not too early, not too late  Need stable-ish UI  Before you have to regression test Plan time for automation and maintenance  Manage as part of regression testing time

9 Selecting the Right Tool Define your tool requirements  What you need it to do  Compatibility with your application  Compatibility with your skillsets Try it out Beware of the hype  “Record and Playback” rarely is that simple

10 Open Source Tools Free to acquire, not to use More time required for implementation  Installation and configuration  Learning to use the product More technical skills required

11 Develop a Framework Organization of artifacts Aim for reusability  Across features, product versions, and products  Separate interface from functionality Dealing with common activities  Object recognition  Navigation  Data validation

12 Dealing with Change Plan for changes in UI  How to respond to test failures  Flexible object recognition Make tests data independent  Reduce dependencies between tests  Set up test data in cleanup scripts  Script tests to use dynamic data Enlist help of developers to ease automation

13 © 2008, Cognizant Technology Solutions. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Automation Assessment

14 14 Objective BackgroundObjective Automation Assessment Approach Process Infrastructure Tools Framework Operating Model Best Practices

15 15 Assessment Scope 15 Infrastructure Process Framework Best Practices Tools Operating Model  Automation Prioritization  Planning & Strategy  Approach  Estimation Model  Documents  Guidelines  Review procedures & Checklists  Metrics Collection  Configuration management  Audits/Assessments  Change Management  Environment management Process  Defect management  Maintenance Approach  Scripting Standards  User Guides  Maintenance Process Handbook  Dynamic Script Allocation  Automation Review Tool  KR portal  Integration of automation scripts to test management tools  Environment Management  Test bed creation and maintenance  Architecture & Type  Test Data Management  Reporting Mechanism  Error & Exception Handling  Folder Structure  Scalability  Reusability  Function Library  Object Repository  Database Testing  Batch Execution  Functional Automation  Test Management  Configuration Management  Defect Management  License Management  Roles & Responsibility  Governance Model  Organizational SLAs  Project structuring  Communication Focus Areas Assessment Scope

16 16 Process  Communication and Collaboration – (BA’s, Developer’s, Manual Tester’s, etc)  Identification and Prioritization  Planning and Estimation  Change Management  Maintenance Approach

17 17 Tools  Functional Automation  Test Management  Configuration Management  Defect Management  Open Source

18 18 Framework  Architecture and Type  Test Data Management  Reporting Mechanism  Reusability  Maintainability  Object Repository  Database Testing

19 19 Infrastructure  Environment Management  Test Bed creation and management

20 20 Best Practices  Scripting Standards  User Guides  Maintenance Process Handbook  Automation Review Tool  KR portal

21 21 Operating Model  Roles and Responsibilities  Organizations SLA’s  Project Structuring

22 22 Assess current automation capabilities Identify the ideal automation tool Set up communication model and status reporting Structured methodology automation testing Define governance model Customized metrics framework Definition of automation framework Highlights Approach - Highlights Organization – Organization structure, Training Methodology – Automation approach, Functional automation, Metrics and reporting Use of reusable automation scripts Well defined independent and peer review procedures in place Defined communication and workload processes for onsite - offshore co-ordination Fully customized metrics framework for implementation across application Consolidation of automation tool Well defined Organization structure and Governance model in place Benefits Focus Areas

23 23 Testing Services Practice Overview IV & V INDEPENDENCE Over 70% of testing performed against code provided by client or third- party vendors. ALLIANCES Established alliances with leading tool vendors like Mercury, Borland & IBM Rational CLIENTS 200+ Clients with 10+ Deep client engagements with over 100 people CENTER OF EXCELLENCE Invested in focused groups around tools & frameworks to provide client value-adds PEOPLE Team of over 5000 dedicated SQA professionals 2001 & 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Offered as a distinct service offering to customers Established onsite- offshore model for testing End-to-end IV&V services provided Brought in domain alignment (Domain Product Testing and BA/QA Offering) Launched to provide specialized functional testing services to existing Cognizant customers Integrated with other value added services such as Performance testing Engaged with clients to setup Managed Test Centers Commenced new client engagements with Test Consulting Focused on Automation and Mainframe CoEs 75 Independent Verification & Validation Service (IV&V) Enhanced service offerings such as compliance testing, package testing, White-box testing as well as Domain/ Product Testing (VisionPLUS, FACETS & POS) BFS InsuranceCommunicationsManlogTechnologyHealthcareLife SciencesIME ? $ Retail OUR DOMAIN FOUNDATION Integrated BA / QA Offering in collaboration with domain practices 170 8500 (E) Delivery excellence through deployment of innovative methodologies. Expand Global footprint 2400 5000 800

24 24 Value Adds AHEAD CRAFT WS Test Professional DataXpress CRAFT 2.0 CRAFT defines the method for scripting of business functionalities as reusable libraries that are repetitive among test cases Bulk uploads QTP scripts, attachments and folder structure to Quality Center SOA testing solutions to test business logic. It enables client to execute data-driven web service testing without any programming knowledge CRAFT 2.0 is a tool which streamlines the test execution activity during test automation, it dynamically executes the test cases in multiple machines in a distributed environment DataXpress is a automated test generation tool which enables to streamline the test data preparation activity

25 25 QC2bugzilla ROI Calculator Watir Win2Pro Selenium test manager It integrates and synchronizes the defects management module of Quality Center with that of Bugzilla. Converts Winrunner scripts to QTP automatically It is an automation functional test tool developed for web automation Return on investment details to have maximum transparency to client before an automation engagement. Web Application Testing in Ruby (WATIR) is an open source function testing framework to test any web application built on ASP,.NET, J2EE or PHP Value Adds

26 © 2008, Cognizant Technology Solutions. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Thank you

27 Have a question for the speakers? Ask now. Q & A

Download ppt " and Better Software magazine presents… Avoid Throwaway Test Automation Sponsored by Cognizant Non-streaming participants should call 1-866-761-8643."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google