Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Project Management With PERT/CPM**

A Case Study: The Reliable Construction Co. Project (Section 16.1) Using a Network to Visually Display a Project (Section 16.2) Scheduling a Project with PERT/CPM (Section 16.3) Dealing with Uncertain Activity Durations (Section 16.4) Considering Time-Cost Tradeoffs (Section 16.5) Scheduling and Controlling Project Costs (Section 16.6) McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

2
**Reliable Construction Company Project**

The Reliable Construction Company has just made the winning bid of $5.4 million to construct a new plant for a major manufacturer. The contract includes the following provisions: A penalty of $300,000 if Reliable has not completed construction within 47 weeks. A bonus of $150,000 if Reliable has completed the plant within 40 weeks. Questions: How can the project be displayed graphically to better visualize the activities? What is the total time required to complete the project if no delays occur? When do the individual activities need to start and finish? What are the critical bottleneck activities? For other activities, how much delay can be tolerated? What is the probability the project can be completed in 47 weeks? What is the least expensive way to complete the project within 40 weeks? How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the project within budget? 16-2

3
**Activity List for Reliable Construction**

Activity Description Immediate Predecessors Estimated Duration (Weeks) A Excavate — 2 B Lay the foundation 4 C Put up the rough wall 10 D Put up the roof 6 E Install the exterior plumbing F Install the interior plumbing 5 G Put up the exterior siding 7 H Do the exterior painting E, G 9 I Do the electrical work J Put up the wallboard F, I 8 K Install the flooring L Do the interior painting M Install the exterior fixtures N Install the interior fixtures K, L Table Activity list for the Reliable Construction Co. project. 16-3

4
Project Networks A network used to represent a project is called a project network. A project network consists of a number of nodes and a number of arcs. Two types of project networks: Activity-on-arc (AOA): each activity is represented by an arc. A node is used to separate an activity from its predecessors. The sequencing of the arcs shows the precedence relationships. Activity-on-node (AON): each activity is represented by a node. The arcs are used to show the precedence relationships. Advantages of AON (used in this textbook): considerably easier to construct easier to understand easier to revise when there are changes 16-4

5
**Reliable Construction Project Network**

Figure The project network for the Reliable Construction Co. project. 16-5

6
The Critical Path A path through a network is one of the routes following the arrows (arcs) from the start node to the finish node. The length of a path is the sum of the (estimated) durations of the activities on the path. The (estimated) project duration equals the length of the longest path through the project network. This longest path is called the critical path. (If more than one path tie for the longest, they all are critical paths.) 16-6

7
**The Paths for Reliable’s Project Network**

Length (Weeks) StartA B C D G H M Finish = 40 Start A B C E H M Finish = 31 Start A B C E F J K N Finish = 43 Start A B C E F J L N Finish = 44 Start A B C I J K N Finish = 41 Start A B C I J L N Finish = 42 Table The paths and path lengths through Reliable’s Project Network. 16-7

8
**Earliest Start and Earliest Finish Times**

The starting and finishing times of each activity if no delays occur anywhere in the project are called the earliest start time and the earliest finish time. ES = Earliest start time for a particular activity EF = Earliest finish time for a particular activity Earliest Start Time Rule: ES = Largest EF of the immediate predecessors. Procedure for obtaining earliest times for all activities: For each activity that starts the project (including the start node), set its ES = 0. For each activity whose ES has just been obtained, calculate EF = ES + duration. For each new activity whose immediate predecessors now have EF values, obtain its ES by applying the earliest start time rule. Apply step 2 to calculate EF. Repeat step 3 until ES and EF have been obtained for all activities. 16-8

9
**ES and EF Values for Reliable Construction for Activities that have only a Single Predecessor**

Figure Earliest start time (ES) and earliest finish time (EF) values for the initial activities in Figure 16.1 that have only a single immediate predecessor. 16-9

10
**ES and EF Times for Reliable Construction**

Figure Earliest start time (ES) and earliest finish time (EF) values for all the activities (plus the start and finish nodes) of the Reliable Construction Co. project. 16-10

11
**Latest Start and Latest Finish Times**

The latest start time for an activity is the latest possible time that it can start without delaying the completion of the project (so the finish node still is reached at its earliest finish time). The latest finish time has the corresponding definition with respect to finishing the activity. LS = Latest start time for a particular activity LF = Latest finish time for a particular activity Latest Finish Time Rule: LF = Smallest LS of the immediate successors. Procedure for obtaining latest times for all activities: For each of the activities that together complete the project (including the finish node), set LF equal to EF of the finish node. For each activity whose LF value has just been obtained, calculate LS = LF – duration. For each new activity whose immediate successors now have LS values, obtain its LF by applying the latest finish time rule. Apply step 2 to calculate its LS. Repeat step 3 until LF and LS have been obtained for all activities. 16-11

12
**LS and LF Times for Reliable’s Project**

Figure Latest start time (LS) and latest finish time (LF) for all the activities (plus the start and finish nodes) of the Reliable Construction Co. project. 16-12

13
**The Complete Project Network**

Figure The complete project network showing ES and LS (in the upper parentheses next to the node) and EF and LF (in the lower parentheses next to the node) for each activity of the Reliable Construction Co. project. The darker arrows show the critical path through the project network. 16-13

14
**Slack for Reliable’s Activities**

Activity Slack (LF–EF) On Critical Path? A Yes B C D 4 No E F G H I 2 J K 1 L M N Table Slack for Reliable’s activities. 16-14

15
**Spreadsheet to Calculate ES, EF, LS, LF, Slack**

Figure A spreadsheet to calculate the ES, EF, LS, LF, slack, and whether or not it is critical, for each activity in Reliable Construction Co.’s project network. 16-15

16
**The PERT Three Estimate Approach**

Most likely estimate (m) = Estimate of most likely value of the duration Optimistic estimate (o) = Estimate of duration under most favorable conditions. Pessimistic estimate (p) = Estimate of duration under most unfavorable conditions. Figure Model of the probability distribution of the duration of an activity for the PERT three-estimate approach: m = most likely estimate, o = optimistic estimate, p = pessimistic estimate. 16-16

17
**Mean and Standard Deviation**

An approximate formula for the variance (2) of an activity is An approximate formula for the mean (m) of an activity is 16-17

18
**Time Estimates for Reliable’s Project**

Activity o m p Mean Variance A 1 2 3 1/9 B 3.5 8 4 C 6 9 18 10 D 5.5 E 4.5 5 4/9 F G 6.5 11 7 H 17 I 7.5 J K L M N Table Expected value and variance of the duration of each activity for Reliable’s project 16-18

19
**Pessimistic Path Lengths for Reliable’s Project**

Pessimistic Length (Weeks) StartA B C D G H M Finish = 70 Start A B C E H M Finish = 54 Start A B C E F J K N Finish = 66 Start A B C E F J L N Finish = 69 Start A B C I J K N Finish = 60 Start A B C I J L N Finish = 63 Table The paths and path lengths through Reliable’s project network when the duration of each activity equals its pessimistic estimate. 16-19

20
**Three Simplifying Approximations of PERT/CPM**

The mean critical path will turn out to be the longest path through the project network. The durations of the activities on the mean critical path are statistically independent. Thus, the three estimates of the duration of an activity would never change after learning the durations of some of the other activities. The form of the probability distribution of project duration is the normal distribution. By using simplifying approximations 1 and 2, there is some statistical theory (one version of the central limit theorem) that justifies this as being a reasonable approximation if the number of activities on the mean critical path is not too small. 16-20

21
**Calculation of Project Mean and Variance**

Activities on Mean Critical Path Mean Variance A 2 1/9 B 4 1 C 10 E 4/9 F 5 J 8 L N 6 Project duration mp = 44 s2p = 9 Table Calculation of mp and s2p for Reliable’s project. 16-21

22
**Probability of Meeting Deadline**

Figure The three simplifying approximations lead to the probability distribution of the duration of Reliable’s project being approximated by the normal distribution shown here. The shaded area is the portion of the distribution that meets the deadline of 47 weeks. 16-22

23
**Probability of Meeting a Deadline**

P(T ≤ d) P(T ≤ d) –3.0 0.0014 0.50 –2.5 0.0062 0.25 0.60 –2.0 0.023 0.5 0.69 –1.75 0.040 0.75 0.77 –1.5 0.067 1.0 0.84 –1.25 0.11 1.25 0.89 –1.0 0.16 1.5 0.933 –0.75 0.23 1.75 0.960 –0.5 0.31 2.0 0.977 –0.25 0.40 2.5 0.9938 3.0 0.9986 Table Approximate probability of meeting a project deadline. 16-23

24
**Spreadsheet for PERT Three-Estimate Approach**

Figure This Excel template in your MS Courseware enables efficient application of the PERT three-estimate approach, as illustrated here for Reliable’s project. 16-24

25
**Considering Time-Cost Trade-Offs**

Question: If extra money is spent to expedite the project, what is the least expensive way of attempting to meet the target completion time (40 weeks)? CPM Method of Time-Cost Trade-Offs: Crashing an activity refers to taking special costly measures to reduce the duration of an activity below its normal value. Special measures might include overtime, hiring additional temporary help, using special time-saving materials, obtaining special equipment, etc. Crashing the project refers to crashing a number of activities to reduce the duration of the project below its normal value. 16-25

26
**Time-Cost Graph for an Activity**

Figure A typical time-cost graph for an activity. 16-26

27
**Time-Cost Trade-Off Data for Reliable’s Project**

Time (weeks) Cost Maximum Reduction in Time (weeks) Crash Cost per Week Saved Activity Normal Crash A 2 1 $180,000 $280,000 $100,000 B 4 320,000 420,000 50,000 C 10 7 620,000 860,000 3 80,000 D 6 260,000 340,000 40,000 E 410,000 570,000 160,000 F 5 180,000 G 900,000 1,020,000 H 9 200,000 380,000 60,000 I 210,000 270,000 30,000 J 8 430,000 490,000 K L 250,000 350,000 M 100,000 N 330,000 510,000 Table Time-Cost trade-off data for the activities of Reliable’s project. 16-27

28
**Marginal Cost Analysis for Reliable’s Project Initial Table**

Length of Path Activity to Crash Crash Cost ABCDGHM ABCEHM ABCEFJKN ABCEFJLN ABCIJKN ABCIJLN 40 31 43 44 41 42 Table The initial table for starting marginal cost analysis of Reliable’s project. 16-28

29
**Marginal Cost Analysis for Reliable’s Project Table After Crashing One Week**

Length of Path Activity to Crash Crash Cost ABCDGHM ABCEHM ABCEFJKN ABCEFJLN ABCIJKN ABCIJLN 40 31 43 44 41 42 J $30,000 Marginal cost analysis of Reliable’s project. Activity J is the cheapest activity to crash on the critical path (ABCEFJLN). 16-29

30
**Marginal Cost Analysis for Reliable’s Project Table After Crashing Two Weeks**

Length of Path Activity to Crash Crash Cost ABCDGHM ABCEHM ABCEFJKN ABCEFJLN ABCIJKN ABCIJLN 40 31 43 44 41 42 J $30,000 39 Marginal cost analysis of Reliable’s project. Activity J is still the cheapest activity to crash on the critical path (ABCEFJLN). 16-30

31
**Marginal Cost Analysis for Reliable’s Project Table After Crashing Three Weeks**

Length of Path Activity to Crash Crash Cost ABCDGHM ABCEHM ABCEFJKN ABCEFJLN ABCIJKN ABCIJLN 40 31 43 44 41 42 J $30,000 39 F $40,000 Marginal cost analysis of Reliable’s project. Activity F is now the cheapest activity to crash on the critical path (ABCEFJLN), since activity J has already been crashed as far as possible.. 16-31

32
**Marginal Cost Analysis for Reliable’s Project Final Table After Crashing Four Weeks**

Length of Path Activity to Crash Crash Cost ABCDGHM ABCEHM ABCEFJKN ABCEFJLN ABCIJKN ABCIJLN 40 31 43 44 41 42 J $30,000 39 F $40,000 Table The final table for performing marginal cost analysis of Reliable’s project. Activity F is the cheapest activity to crash on the critical path (ABCEFJLN), since activity J has already been crashed as far as possible. 16-32

33
**Project Network After Crashing**

Figure The project network if activities J and F are fully crashed (with all other activities normal) for Reliable’s project. The darker arrows show the various critical paths through the project network. 16-33

34
**Using LP to Make Crashing Decisions**

Restatment of the problem: Consider the total cost of the project, including the extra cost of crashing activities. The problem then is to minimize this total cost, subject to the constraint that project duration must be less than or equal to the time desired by the project manager. The decisions to be made are the following: The start time of each activity. The reduction in the duration of each activity due to crashing. The finish time of the project (must not exceed 40 weeks). The constraints are: Time Reduction ≤ Max Reduction (for each activity). Project Finish Time ≤ Desired Finish Time. Activity Start Time ≥ Activity Finish Time of all predecessors (for each activity). Project Finish Time ≥ Finish Time of all immediate predecessors of finish node. 16-34

35
Spreadsheet Model Figure The spreadsheet displays the application of the CPM method of time-cost trade-offs to Reliable’s project, where columns I and J show the optimal solution obtained by using the Excel Solver. 16-35

36
**Mr. Perty’s Conclusions**

The plan for crashing the project only provides a 50 percent chance of actually finishing the project within 40 weeks, so the extra cost of the plan ($140,000) is not justified. Therefore, Mr. Perty rejects any crashing at this stage. The extra cost of the crashing plan can be justified if it almost certainly would earn the bonus of $150,000 for finishing the project within 40 weeks. Therefore, Mr. Perty will hold the plan in reserve to be implemented if the project is running well ahead of schedule before reaching activity F. The extra cost of part or all of the crashing plan can be easily justified if it likely would make the difference in avoiding the penalty of $300,000 for not finishing the project within 47 weeks. Therefore, Mr. Perty will hold the crashing plan in reserve to be partially or wholly implemented if the project is running far behind schedule before reaching activity F or activity J. 16-36

37
**Scheduling and Controlling Project Costs**

PERT/Cost is a systematic procedure (normally computerized) to help the project manager plan, schedule, and control costs. Assumption: A common assumption when using PERT/Cost is that the costs of performing an activity are incurred at a constant rate throughout its duration. 16-37

38
**Budget for Reliable’s Project**

Activity Estimated Duration (weeks) Estimated Cost Cost per Week of Its Duration A 2 $180,000 $90,000 B 4 320,000 80,000 C 10 620,000 62,000 D 6 260,000 43,333 E 410,000 102,500 F 5 180,000 36,000 G 7 900,000 128,571 H 9 200,000 22,222 I 210,000 30,000 J 8 430,000 53,750 K 160,000 40,000 L 250,000 50,000 M 100,000 N 330,000 55,000 Table The project budget for Reliable’s project. 16-38

39
**PERT/Cost Spreadsheet (Earliest Start Times)**

Figure This Excel template in your MS Courseware enables efficient application of the PERT/Cost procedure, as illustrated here for the beginning of Reliable’s project when using earliest start times. 16-39

40
**PERT/Cost Spreadsheet (Earliest Start Times)**

Figure This spreadsheet extends the template in Figure to weeks 17 to 25. 16-40

41
**PERT/Cost Spreadsheet (Latest Start Times)**

16-41

42
**PERT/Cost Spreadsheet (Latest Start Times)**

Figure The application of the PERT/Cost procedure to weeks 17 to 25 of Reliable’s project when using latest start times. 16-42

43
**Cumulative Project Costs**

Figure The schedule of cumulative project costs when all activities begin at their earliest start times (the top cost curve) or at their latest start times (the bottom cost curve). 16-43

44
**PERT/Cost Report after Week 22**

Activity Budgeted Cost Percent Completed Value Completed Actual Cost to Date Cost Overrun to Date A $180,000 100% $200,000 $20,000 B 320,000 100 330,000 10,000 C 620,000 600,000 –20,000 D 260,000 75 195,000 200,000 5,000 E 410,000 400,000 –10,000 F 180,000 25 45,000 60,000 15,000 I 210,000 50 105,000 130,000 25,000 Total $2,180,000 $1,875,000 $1,920,000 $45,000 Table PERT/Cost Report after Week 22 of Reliable’s project. 16-44

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on latest technology in electronics and instrumentation Ppt on omission of articles in english Ppt on review of literature science Ppt on linear equations in two variables calculator Ppt on manufacturing industries for class 10 geography Ppt on telephone etiquettes images Ppt on pi in maths lesson Ppt on raving fans book Ppt on object-oriented programming concepts in c++ Ppt on bluetooth communication devices