We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKeon Emmet
Modified over 2 years ago
© 2007 E.ON Nexus AQ Requirements To support the current business processes We need to maintain performance and enable market operation as is using current AQ process To enable movement to a fully smart/AMR world AQ will be less important if we move to meter point allocation on a daily basis, much as DM AQ is less important in the current framework To support interim processes through the change period Moving from the current annual process to enable AQ changes to more accurately reflect current consumption would be feasible through the introduction of rolling AQ, as defined in Mod 209
© 2007 E.ON12 October 2014, E.ON, Page 2 Allocation workshop has recommended daily allocation at a site level This may be using daily information supplied from the CCP This may use estimated daily allocation reconciled on a regular basis Where daily allocation takes place AQ will be less relevant Where any estimation is required (missing read information) then AQ would be likely to form the basis of any estimation process Any form of estimation using AQ would have the same issues as current profiling
© 2007 E.ON12 October 2014, E.ON, Page 3 AQ is a historic calculation and does not reflect changing consumption behaviour of consumers – this was particularly evident over the past 12 months of recession impact on LSP and energy efficiency within SSP Rolling AQ would help ensure AQ was reflective of changing behaviour as soon as possible Implementing Rolling AQ would enable benefits in the transition period A fully AMR/Smart world could also feed into rolling AQ to ensure any estimation was based on current values
CONFIDENTIAL - Title of presentation © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
Performance Assurance 21 st May Value Chain. Value Chain Xoserve would like to propose an approach to further aid the development of the Performance Assurance.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
1 Project Nexus Approach to modelling costs and benefits Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 15 May 2012.
Mod 270 Potential Options Rob Hill 15/02/2009. Six potential options following discussion at last months Development Workgroup OptionNameDescription 1Elective.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
Individual Meter Point Reconciliation. What? Calculation of actual energy used at meter point level for all supply points Allow sites to be accurately.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup Supply Point Register 25 th October 2011.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
21 May 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Mod 115 An alternative view Phil Broom Gaz de France ESS.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
AQ Tolerance Proposal Mod 209 – August Page 2Theme Date Department AQ Tolerances Provide a view of appropriate tolerances for AQ validation
1 Gas Consumer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update 27th July 2009.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) 21 st / 22 nd June 2011.
Mod 232 Anna Taylor Pricing Manager. 1 Mod 232 An alternative methodology for allocating unidentified energy Currently allocated by RbD entirely in SSP.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
SPA Enquiry Process - Additional Requirements for AMR sites ICoSS Presentation.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
PN UNC Workgroup 20/9/11 Requirements Definition to Delivery.
AQ Overview. Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
Seasonal Normal Weather Base Sallyann Blackett Gas Forecasting Manager.
Use of AMR data Gareth Evans on behalf of Corona Energy.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
ScottishPower, Energy Retail MOD 282 – Introduction of a process to manage Long Term Vacant Sites May 2010 Elaine Carr ScottishPower.
1 Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2 nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
Presenters:- Steve Nunnington xoserve & Sallyann Blackett E.on Sallyann Blackett E.on Rolling AQ – A Straw Man.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESSES TO DIRECTLY IMPROVE THE BOTTOM LINE THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY 3 rd May 2010 Kees Brinkman Managing Director.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous.
IGT Single Service Provision Requirements Update – 27 th March 2013.
1 Performance Assurance Workgroup January 2014 A proposal by Xoserve for a Performance Assurance methodology.
Nexus Workgroup CSEP Transition Topic June
Samordningsrådet med kunskapsplattform för smarta elnät Smart Grid and Smart Metering - Swedish Experiences Karin Widegren, Director Swedish Coordination.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
Impacts of Mod 244 Steve Nunnington xoserve. Background 96.5% of transportation charges based on capacity. These are dependent on historical throughput.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 19 November 2010.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.