Presentation on theme: "Population and Poverty"— Presentation transcript:
1Population and Poverty Tom MerrickWorld Bank InstituteAugust 21, 2002
2Recent research findings: Slower population growth creates the potential to increase the pace of aggregate economic growthRapid fertility decline at the country level helps create a path out of poverty for many families
4New Findings on GrowthRecent studies of effects of demographic change on growth help explain the past experience of different countries and regions (slow growth in Africa versus the burst of growth in East Asia, )The demographic experience of East Asia is good news for countries on a similar path of fertility decline (e.g., Latin America and more recently, Africa)
5The Demographic Transition Population growth rateBirth ratedeath ratetime
6Population Growth Rate Over the Course of the Demographic Transition birth rate minus death rateTIME
9Changing Age Structure Produces a “Demographic Bonus” As the gab between birth and death rates narrows, the ratio of workers to non-workers is unusually high and increasing.During this demographic ‘bonus time’ more workers are potentially producing more total output, greater wealth accumulation, and an increasing supply of human capital.The changing age structure is driven mostly by fertility decline.
10Population Growth and the Age Structure Population share at working agesPopulation growth ratetime
11Ratio of Workers to Dependents 2.22East Asia1.8Latin America1.6Ratio of Workers to DependentsS.C. Asia1.41.2Africa11950195519601965197019751980198519901995Year
12The Effect On SavingsAn increase in the worker-dependent ratio can increase savings and investmentIn the case of East Asia, the increase in that ratio and the associated increase in savings can be associated with 1/3 of the total 6% average annual per capita growth rate,
13Stylized Model of Economic Growth and the Demographic Transition Growth rate of real GDP per capitaOther Transitional ForcesEconomic MiracleDemographic GiftYouth Demographic BurdenSustainable GrowthC.1945C.1960C.2010C.2025Time
14The Policy Environment Matters Benefits from a ‘demographic bonus’ depend on the policy context. In East Asia, demand for labor rose rapidly, absorbing rising supply at rising levels of labor productivity. What happened?1. Fiscal discipline2. Open and competitive markets3. Public investment in education and health careIn Latin America, the demographic bonus has been less effectively exploited.
15Institutions Matter Too 1. Rule of Law2. Property Rights3. Political StabilityPolicies and institutions moderate negative effects of rapid population growth, and reinforce positive effects of the demographic bonus.
16Reinforcing effects: Endogenous factors can be important Higher lifeexpectancy +good policyenvironmentHighereconomicgrowthTechnologicalchangeLower fertility&Higher lifeexpectancy+ good policyenvironmentHigher & sustainedeconomic growthIn East Asia, there may have been no ultimate “cause”, only a process
17Poverty and Fertility Change On the one hand... The association of high fertility with poverty does not prove that one causes the other;Moreover, even if poverty leads to high fertility, that may reflect parents’ sensible decisions to trade off current consumption for greater future family income (when children work or for greater old age security);So, economists have traditionally hesitated to endorse policies and programs to reduce fertility.
18On the other hand...New studies confirm that fertility at the country level does appear to increase absolute levels of poverty by:Slowing economic growth and growth-induced poverty reductionSkewing distribution of consumption against the poor
19Slowing economic growth & poverty reduction Household surveys in Brazil show that the decline in poverty associated with what has been a dramatic reduction in fertility is equivalent to what would have been produced by a 0.7% greater annual increase in per capita GDP.An analysis of 45 developing countries reveals that had the average country reduced its birth rate by 5 per 1000 throughout the 1980s, the average country poverty incidence of 18.9% in the mid-1980s would have been reduced to 12.6% between 1990 and 1995.
20Moreover, high fertility may not even be optimal, even for poor families. Poor parents have severely constrained choices. The apparent alternative of fewer ‘higher quality’ children does not exist, if public spending on health and schooling is inadequate.The poor may lack critical information: The market for information is far from perfect. The poor often lack information on declining infant mortality, increasing returns to schooling, and improving financial markets.Men may dominate the choice in # of children, while not fully sharing the costs.
21And evidence increasingly suggests: A higher prevalence of unwanted pregnancies among the poorA strong response to reduced costs of controlling fertility. (In the last decade, fertility has fallen among the poor and uneducated who had access to health and family planning services.)
22So, both theory and improved and expanded empirical efforts support the likelihood that high average fertility at the country level hurts the poor, and that their own high fertility can contribute to their and their children’s poverty
23Policy Implications Undo existing policy-induced distortions Ensure economic policies that strengthen land, labor, and financial marketsInvest heavily in education and health programsImprove status of womenSubsidize voluntary family planning and information services