1. Development of the maps

3. Process Mapping Methodology Stage 1: Drafting phase C onsult:PP1 Deliverables, Map, Phases and Activity Zones Interview transcripts Literature and ideas Existing Industry Project processes Drafting Phase

4. Process Mapping Methodology Stage 2: Issue for review Review internally among project team Amend Approve Drafting Phase Issue for review

5. Process Mapping Methodology Stage 3: Verified Model Phase Partnering University external review Cross Activity Zone interface check Amend Approve Drafting Phase Issue for review Verified Model phase

6. Process Mapping Methodology Stage 4: Validated Model review Workshop:Present Review Amend IImprove Drafting Phase Issue for review Verified Model phase Validated Model review

7. Process Mapping Methodology Stage 5: Final Version Final Review Submit for Publishing Final Version Drafting Phase Issue for review Verified Model phase Validated Model review

8. Process Map Development: March 99 Level 2 Deliverable (red) Level 2 Process (white) Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Object connector Grouping tool Level 3 Process (blue) Level 3 Deliverable (yellow) Lexicon Fig. 4 Initial sub process map presented at Steering Committee Meeting 23 rd March 1999

9. Process Map Development: June 99 New process symbol New deliverable symbol Dashed grouping tool Simplified Lexicon Single colour level 1 band process symbol Fig. 5. FM Sub Process Map Revised June 1999

10. Process Map Development: Sept 99 Fig.7 Sub Process map presented to Academic Steering Committee 3 rd September 1999 New symbol showing process ownership and activity zone participants Phase start up activity group End of Phase activity group On-going phase activity group Phase risk activity group Improved title grid

11. Process Map Development: Oct 99 Level 1 Deliverables only represented New Title Block Logical Dependency Level 2 Processes decomposed from the level 1 process are grouped Level 3 Processes decomposed from the level 2 process are grouped Decomposition line Fig. 8 Verified Development Management Map drafted to incorporate the modelling rules developed at the 29 th September – 1 st October Workshop at Salford University

12. Components of the Maps Mapping Template –Layout –Colour –Standard Groups Process representations Inputs Outputs (Deliverables) Mapping Rules Considerations: –Recognised methodologies –Other process mapping –Layout for logical presentation –Colour for clarity

13. Mapping Template

14. Process Representations Activity Zone(s) which own the process, irrespective of level Participation from other Activity Zones

15. Process Inputs Logical dependency

16. Process Decomposition: an example

17. Process Decomposition - DevM view

18. Process Decomposition - FM view

19. Process Outputs

20. Integrated maps

22. Mapping Template On-going Phase Group Phase Start-up Group End of Phase Group

23. Case studies Maritime Housing Christiani Nielsen Manchester Airport Britannia Walk Teamwork 2001 Castle Vale AMEC

24. Process Map Creation Toolkit –Allows users to create and customise their own project process map by using the Process Protocol as a framework Process Management Toolkit –Project information management system, allowing users to manage the process and project information Process Protocol Toolkit

25. Company adoption/ uptake Clients –British Nuclear Fuels, British Aerospace, BT Government bodies –CRISP, IAI, CRT Construction Companies –Taylor Woodrow, Alfred McAlpine, Tarmac, AMEC, Citex, Christiani & Nielsen, WSP Group, John Mowlem, Property Tectonics, Tilbury Douglas, P3 Knowledge Technology, Schal, Pochins Research projects –Lean Construction Network, Process Network, TOPIC (Training for Performance Improvement for Construction)

26. Industry adoption/ uptake CIRIA, DETR and CRT produced Standardisation and Pre-Assembly: Clients Guide –Standardisation in every aspect of the construction process …has enormous potential. CIRIA and the CRT is leading the initiative to making the benefits and methods of standardisation more widely understood and acknowledged … (M Forster, BAA)

27. Industry adoption/ uptake Department of Trade and Industry have sponsored the development of a Process Implementation training module as part of the Process Protocol implementation project on Britannia Walk

28. Industry adoption/ uptake Introduced a new and commercially tested management technique - the Gateway process - to deliver value for money improvements in major construction, IT and PFI projects –Peter Gershon, the Office of Government Commerces Chief Executive, 20 February 2001

29. Process Map Creation Toolkit –Allows users to create and customise their own project process map by using the Process Protocol as a framework Process Management Toolkit –Project information management system, allowing users to manage the process and project information Process Protocol Toolkit

30. Process Map Creation Tool Demonstrator Objectives –Help to adopt the Process Protocol framework –Customize the Generic Process Protocol Map –Simplify the creation of project process map

31. Process Map Creation Tool Demonstrator Standalone Solution

32. Process Map Creation Tool Demonstrator Features –Based on the Process Protocol Framework –Incorporated detailed Process Protocol Information –Fully Customisable –Standard data structure Future Work –Improve usability –Network capability –Integrate into existing Project Management System

33. Process Information Management Tool Aim –To manage the project information for construction projects based on the process model Possible Solution –Further development on existing Internet based project management package

34. Process Information Management Tool Architecture Process Modelling Workflow Engine Project Data Process Protocol Framework Process Change Project Information Management