Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Combination therapy for MPNs

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Combination therapy for MPNs"— Presentation transcript:

1 Combination therapy for MPNs
Who, Why and When? Ruben A. Mesa, MD Professor & Chairman, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology Deputy Director, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Mayo Clinic – Arizona, USA ©2011 MFMER |

2 Combination Therapies for MPNs Who, Why, When?
Unmet Burden in MPN Patients ET & PV MF Evolving response criteria highlight unmet goals Rationale for Combination Strategies Clinical Trials and Off Protocol Combinations

3 The Natural History of MPNs
Diagnosis WHO 2008 Essential Thrombocythemia Polycythemia Vera Early/ Pre-fibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis Classic Primary MF Post ET/PV MF MPN Blast Phase ©2011 MFMER |

4 Patterns of Survival and Causes of Death In 9,384 Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Diagnosed In Sweden Between 1973 and 2008 Hultcrantz et al Blood 2010 (a3071)

5 Burden of ET/PV MPN Associated Symptoms Macrovascular Risk
Microvascular Symptoms

6 Burden of Myelofibrosis
MF Associated Symptoms Splenomegaly Anemia/ Cytopenias

7 Myelofibrosis and Cytopenias (N=364)
N.B. Varying times NL Hg Men 13.5 g/dL Women 12 g/dL Emanuel et. al. JCO 2012 ©2011 MFMER |

8 Cytopenias and their impact MF
Anemia Fatigue Dyspnea Organ Dysfunction Thrombocytopenia Hemorrhage Leukopenia Infection > > Normal Energy Levels 10g/dL Hemoglobin – Transfusions & Energy Levels 8g/dL ©2011 MFMER |

9 Myelofibrosis and Splenomegaly
89% of MF with palpable splenomegaly (at diagnosis) Multi-institutional database of 1054 patients at time of diagnosis of PMF (Cervantes et. al. Blood 2009) 64% with palpable splenomegaly (By physician report) Median spleen size 7.4 cm BLCM International prospective MPN symptom study N=329 MF patients (Emanuel et. al. JCO 2012) ©2011 MFMER |

10 Why does splenomegaly in MF matter?
Mechanical discomfort Pain Possible splenic infarction Early satiety adding to cachexia Splenic sequestration and exacerbation of cytopenias May delay engraftment in setting of allogeneic stem cell transplant ©2011 MFMER |

11 Symptoms in 1179 MPN Patients
Mesa et. al. Cancer 2007;109:68-76 11 11

12 Evolution of MPN Symptom Assessment Tools
MPN-SAF Languages English French German Spanish Dutch Swedish Italian Portuguese Mandarin Japanese Hebrew Vascular and Ψ Sx 9 Items MPN–SAF 2011 (27 items) Blood 2011 MPN-SAF TSS (10 items 2012) JCO 2012 Constitutional Sx 5 Items MF–SAF 2009 (19 items) Leuk Res 2009 MF-SAF 2.0 (7 items 2011) JCO 2013 Spleen Sx 4 Items Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) – 9 Items QOL 1 Item

13 MPN Symptom Burden by Quartiles 1858 MPN-SAF Respondents
TSS <8 Q2 TSS 8 -17 Q3 TSS Q4 TSS >32 Quartile 1 (Q1): 0-24% Quartile 2 (Q2): 25-49% Quartile 3 (Q3): 50-74% Quartile 4 (Q4): % Percentile MPN-SAF TSS

14 ET (N=775) PV (N=654) MF (N=423) Q1 – 30% Q2 – 26% Q3 – 24% Q4 – 20%

15 Present# (1pt) vs. Absent
Evolving MPN Prognostic Scales IPSET (ET – 3 groups) Survival Thrombosis Risk PV Risk (4 groups) Leukemia Rates DIPSS (PMF – 4 groups) Age ≥ 60 (2pts) vs. < 60 ≥70 (3pts) 60-69 (2pts), <60 ≥65 (1pt) vs. <65 Leukocytes ≥ 11 (1pt) vs. < 11 x 109/L ≥15 (1 point) vs. <15 x 109/L >25 (1pt) vs. ≤25 x 109/L Hemoglobin <10 (2 pts) vs. ≥10g/dL Constitutional Symptoms Present# (1pt) vs. Absent Blasts ≥1% (1pt) vs. <1% Prior Thrombosis Yes (1 point) vs. No Risk Group Point Cutoffs 0; 1-2; 3-4 pts. 0; 1-2; 3; 4 pts. 0; 1-2; 3-4; ≥4 pts. Passamonti Blood 2012 Tefferi ASH 2011 Passamonti Blood 2010 # = >10% Weight Loss over prior 6 months, Night Sweats, Unexplained Fever

16 PV Symptom Burden – Clusters by Risk*
Emanuel et. al. ASH 2012 * Tefferi ASH 2011 ©2011 MFMER |

17 ET Symptom Burden – Clusters by Risk IPSET*
Emanuel et. al. ASH 2012 * Passamonti Blood 2012 ©2011 MFMER |

18 MF Symptom Burden - Clusters
Geyer et. al. ASH 2012 ©2011 MFMER |

19 Decreased QOL in 1433 MPN Patients
Scherber et. al.JCO in press 2012

20 Conclusions of Burden of MPNs
MPN patients exist on a spectrum of Risk of vascular events Impact on survival Symptomatic Burden Risk of Progression Current information reflects unmet needs of Symptomatic improvement in many MPN patients in many Risk of disease progression Residual risk of vascular events in fewer but still relevant

21 Combination Therapies for MPNs Who, Why, When?
Unmet Burden in MPN Patients ET & PV MF Evolving response criteria highlight unmet goals Rationale for Combination Strategies Clinical Trials and Off Protocol Combinations

22 New Response Criteria for MPNs ELN (PV & ET), IWG-MRT (MF) (Blood 2013)
Complete Response X Partial Response Clinical Improvement Stable Disease No response Relapse Other Responses Molecular Cytogenetic &

23 New Response Criteria for MPNs ELN ET (Blood 2013)
≥ 10pt Improvement MPN-SAF TSS

24 New Response Criteria for MPNs ELN ET (Blood 2013)

25 New Response Criteria for MPNs ELN PV (Blood 2013)

26 New Response Criteria for MPNs ELN PV (Blood 2013)

27 New Response Criteria for MPNs IWG-MRT MF (Blood 2013)
Complete Response Partial Response

28 New Response Criteria for MPNs IWG-MRT MF (Blood 2013)

29 New Response Criteria for MPNs IWG-MRT MF (Blood 2013)

30 New Response Criteria for MPNs IWG-MRT MF (Blood 2013) Cytogenetics/ Molecular

31 Revised MPN Response Criteria
New response criteria remain clinically derived and focus on resolution of marrow histologic changes, blood counts, spleen size, symptom improvement, and lack of vascular events or progression All require over 12 weeks of benefit to be counted as response Value and measurement of stability (clinically or histologically) still not captured Validation of value of response levels needed ©2011 MFMER |

32 Combination Therapies for MPNs Who, Why, When?
Unmet Burden in MPN Patients ET & PV MF Evolving response criteria highlight unmet goals Rationale for Combination Strategies Clinical Trials and Off Protocol Combinations

33 MPNs – Individualizing Combinations The Internists Disease
Goal – Prevent Vascular Events Goal – Improve Cytopenias Goal – Improve Spleen and Sx Goal – Cure High Risk Disease ET PV MF Allo SCT GVH Rx ID Rx Other JAK2 Inhib CV Risk Control JAK2 Inhib CYTOREDUCTIVE PHLEB IMIDs ASA

34 Medical Therapies in MPN Pre JAK2 Inhibitors – Efficacy Summary
Yes No Occasional Not Reported Yet Myelofibrosis Polycythemia Vera Essential Thrombocythemia Spleen Const. Sympt. Anemia Survival Counts Vasc Events ASPIRIN Hydroxyurea Anagrelide Androgens ESAs Interferons IMIDS Ruxolitinib Hypomethylation ©2011 MFMER |

35 JAK1 & 2 Inhibitors in MPNs – Efficacy Summary
Yes No Occasional Not Reported Yet Ongoing Trials Myelofibrosis Polycythemia Vera Essential Thrombocythemia Spleen Const. Sympt. Anemia Survival Counts Vasc Events Ruxolitinib - Approved P III P II SAR – PIII Ongoing (MF) Pacritinib- CYT387 LY P I NS-018 BMS CEP701 ©2011 MFMER |

36 MPNs – Plateau vs. Decline
Clinical Status ET – Possible Plateau Asymptomatic Thrombocytosis No Vascular Events ET – Possible Plateau 2 Symptomatic Thrombocytosis Sinus Venous Thrombosis PV – Possible Plateau 2 Symptomatic Erythrocytosis No Vascular Events MF on Successful JAK2 Rx Improving Weight Decreased Spleen Improved Survival Post PV MF 6 Months worsening Fatigue 10 kg weight loss Massive spleen Time ©2011 MFMER |

37 JAK2 Inhibition in MF Potential Targets of Combinations
Preventing JAK2 inhibitor cytopenias Overcoming existing cytopenias Normalization of splenomegaly Normalization of marrow changes Delaying “progression” Further extension of survival Normalization of cytokines Improved QoL/symptom resolution ©2011 MFMER |

38 Combination Therapies for MPNs Who, Why, When?
Unmet Burden in MPN Patients ET & PV MF Evolving response criteria highlight unmet goals Rationale for Combination Strategies Clinical Trials and Off Protocol Combinations

39

40 Morphologic change after IFN therapy in a
patient with primary myelofibrosis (After Median 3 years of Rx). Silver et. al. Blood 2011 17 “Early” PMF (MF<Grade 3) IWG (11 low, 6 Int 1) INFa2b or PEG Infa-2a IWG-MRT 2 CR, 7 PR, 1 CI (59% Response) Morphologic change after IFN therapy in a patient with primary myelofibrosis. (A-D) Before treatment (2002). (A) The area of myelofibrosis (left), with preserved residual foci of hematopoiesis, and abnormal megakaryocyte morphology (right). (B) Abnormal megakaryocyte morphology. (C) 2+ reticulin fibrosis. (D) Collagen fibrosis. (E-H) After treatment (2009). (E) Improved bone marrow architecture, hematopoiesis, and megakaryocyte morphology. (F) Improved megakaryocyte morphology and increased normoblastic erythropoiesis. (G) Minimal reticulin fibrosis. (H) Absent collagen fibrosis. Gowin et. al. ASH 2011 17 “Early” PMF (MF<Grade 3) PEG Infa-2a IWG-MRT 1 CR, 2 PR, 1 CI (29% Response) Silver R T et al. Blood 2011;117:

41 Ruxolitinib Vs. Hydroxyurea (RELIEF)
Single Agent Trials in MPNs (Select) ET/PV STUDY (ET and PV) MPD-RC 112 Peg Inf a2a vs. Hydroxyurea (PH III) NCT STUDY (ET and PV) MPD-RC 111 Peg Inf a2a AFTER Hydroxyurea (PH III) NCT STUDY (PV) AOP Peg Inf a2a vs Hydroxyurea (PH III) NCT STUDY COMBINATION (PV) Ruxolitinib Vs. Hydroxyurea (RELIEF) NCT

42 Combination Therapies in MPNs ET and PV
NON STUDY COMBINATION Hydroxyurea Plus Anagrelide NON STUDY COMBINATION Hydroxyurea Plus PEG INFa 2a/b NON STUDY COMBINATION ASA Plus Clopidrogel FUTURE STUDY COMBINATION JAK2 Inhibitor Plus PEG INFa 2a/b

43 Single Agent Trials in MPNs (Select) MF (Accruing JAK2 Inhibitors)
STUDY (JAK2/FLT3 Inhibitor) Fedratinib (SAR302503) AFTER Ruxolitinib (PH II) NCT NCT (ET and PV Phase II after Hydroxyurea) STUDY (JAK2/FLT3 Inhibitor) NS-018 (PH I/II) NCT STUDY (JAK2/FLT3 Inhibitor) Pacritinib (SB1518) (PH III vs. BAT) NCT STUDY (JAK2 Inhibitor – Also ET and PV) LY (PH I/II) NCT

44 Single Agent Trials in MPNs (Select) MF (Accruing Non JAK 2 Inhibitors)
STUDY (Interferons) Peg Interferon α2b in “Early” MF Cornell Lead: NCT STUDY (Activin - ActRIIA-IgG1Fc) Sotatercept (ACE 011) MDACC: NCT STUDY (Telomerase Inhibitor) Imetelstat (GRN163L) Mayo Clinic (Rochester): NCT STUDY (JAK1 Inhibitor) INCB (PH II) NCT

45 Oral Arsenic Trioxide (+/- Ascorbic Acid)
Single Agent Trials in MPNs (Select) MF (Accruing Non JAK 2 Inhibitors) STUDY (HSP90 Inhibitor) AUY 922 NCT STUDY Oral Arsenic Trioxide (+/- Ascorbic Acid) MDACC: NCT

46 Long Term Complications of MPNs Surgical Therapy of Splenomegaly
CP

47 Long Term Complications of MF Splenectomy Update 2004 - Survival by Indication
Mechanical Anemia Portal Hypertension Thrombocytopenia P=N.S.

48 Survival after Transplantation
Scott B L et al. Blood 2012;119:

49 Overall Survival by Age
BU 10 mg/kg Flu 180 mg/m2 Kröger et al, Blood, 114:5264, 2009

50 Combination Therapies in MPNs MF (Non Medicine Combinations)
NON STUDY COMBINATION Splenectomy Then JAK2 Inhibitor NON STUDY COMBINATION JAK2 Inhibitor Plus Splenic XRT STUDY COMBINATION Ruxolitinib Then Allo Stem Cell Tx Trial: MPD-RC 114 NCT French Trial NCT

51 Decitabine for AML post-MPN
7 patients treated Age 72 (45-81) 4/7 improved symptoms 7/7 improved splenomegaly 4/7 improved anemia 3/7 achieved complete morphologic remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRi) Mascarenhas J Leuk Res Sep;34(9):

52 Median survival: 11 months
Azacitidine for MDS and AML post-MPN All (n = 54) WHO classification at progression AML (n = 26) MDS (n = 28) Responses CR, n ( % ) 10 (19) 2 (8) 8 (29) Overall response rate, n (%) 28 (52) CR + CRi + PR, n (%) 10 (38) CR + marrow CR + PR + stable with HI, n (%) 18 (64) Median survival: 11 months Thepot S et al. Blood 2010;116:

53 IMiDs in MF: Summary of Clinical Data
HB PLT SPLN REF THAL 29% 38% 41% Barosi 2002 THAL-PRED 62% 75% 19% Mesa 2002 LEN 22% 50% 33% Tefferi 2006 LEN-PRED ? 9% Mesa 2010 30% 42% Quintas-Cardama 2009 POM (0.5mg/day) >50% <25% POM+/-PRED 30-40% 40% <10% Tefferi 2008 53 53

54 Combination Therapies in MPNs MF (Approved Drug Combinations - Anemia)
STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS Androgen) Ruxolitinib Plus Danazol Mayo Clinic (AZ) and Mt. Sinai Trial: NCT STUDY COMBINATION(JAK2 PLUS Hypomethylation) Ruxolitinib Plus Azacitidine MDACC Trial: NCT STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS IMID) Ruxolitinib Plus Lenalidomide NCT

55 DAC Inhibitors LBH589 (Panobinostat) Givinostat (ITF2357)
Mascarenhas et. al. ASH A794 (2011) – Monotherapy active, low dose key DeAngelo et. al. ASH 2010 A630. Monotherapy active but dose used limiting Combination trial EU Ruxolitnib plus panobinostat Givinostat (ITF2357) Rambaldi et. al BJH 2010 16 patient with MF. 3 Good responses and decrease in pruritus Vorinostat (SAHA) MPD-RC trial in combination with 5-AZA

56 Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat
Combination Therapies in MPNs MF (Approved/Non Approved Drug Combinations) STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS HDAC Inhibitors) Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat Mt. Sinai Trial: NCT UK Trial: NCT STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS LOXL2 Inhibitors) Ruxolitinib Plus GS-6624 NCT STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS rhPTX-2 (Anti-fibrosing)) Ruxolitinib Plus PRM -151 Opening Soon STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS PI3 Kinase Inhibitor) Ruxolitinib Plus BKM120 NCT

57 Ruxolitinib Plus LDE225 Ruxolitinib Plus Pomalidomide
Combination Therapies in MPNs MF (Approved/Non Approved Drug Combinations) STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS Hedgehog Inhibitor) Ruxolitinib Plus LDE225 NCT STUDY COMBINATION (JAK2 PLUS IMID) Ruxolitinib Plus Pomalidomide Germany (ULM): NCT

58 MPN-QOL International Study Group www.mpn-qol.org
MEASURE Trial Serial assessment of MPN symptoms and QOL in all currently available therapies SYMPTOM Trial Serial assessment of the BMT experience in MPN symptoms (and BMT/GVHD symptoms) and QOL Supported by a grant from the MPN Foundation ©2011 MFMER |

59 Individualizing MPN Pharmacotherapy
Patient Goals & Input Improving Symptom Burden /HR QOL “Balancing” Spleen/ Cytoses/ Cytopenias Extending Life CURE ©2011 MFMER |

60

61 Acknowledgements Italy Mayo Clinic USA Sweden UK Denmark Germany
Tiziano Barbui, MD Alessandro Vannucchi, MD Francesco Passamonti, MD Giovanni Barosi, MD Alessandro Rambaldi, MD Maria Ferarri, MD Sweden Peter Johansson, MD, PhD Bjorn Andreasson, MD Jan Samuelsson, MD Gunnar Birgegard, MD Denmark Hans Hasselbalch, MD Germany Heike Pahl, PhD Martin Grisshammer, MD Mayo Clinic Amylou Dueck, PhD Jeff Sloan, PhD Tim Beebe, PhD John Camoriano, MD Ayalew Tefferi, MD USA Robyn Scherber MPH Ron Hoffman, MD S. Verstovsek, MD Gail Roboz, MD UK Deepti Radia, MD Claire Harrison, MD Mary Francis McMullin, MD France Jean-Jacques Kiladjian CMPD EDUCATION FOUNDATION


Download ppt "Combination therapy for MPNs"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google