1. PUBLIC ACTION FOR URBAN POVERTY REDUCTION:
UPA Package 1, Module 3
PUBLIC ACTION FOR URBAN POVERTY REDUCTION:
POLICY OPTIONS AND NATIONAL–LOCAL GOVERNMENT ROLES

2. THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACT OF 1992

3. The Socio–Politico Context
Post 1986 Philippines: Redemocratization after Martial Law Regime
1987 Constitution
Article II Sec. 23. The State shall encourage non-governmental community-based or sectoral organizations that promote the welfare of the nation
Article XIII, Sections 9 and 10.
Provides for a continuing program of urban land reform and housing
Make available at affordable cost decent housing and basic services to underprivileged and homeless citizens
Promote adequate employment opportunities for these citizens
No eviction of urban or rural poor dwellers except in accordance with law and in just and humane manner
Article XIII, Sections 15 and 16
Respect the role of independent people’s organizations to pursue and protect their collective interests and aspirations through peaceful and lawful means
Recognize the right of people’s organizations to effective and reasonable people’s participation at all levels of social, political and economic decision–making

4. The Socio–Politico Context
Local Government Code of 1991
The Code mandates local government units to adopt a comprehensive land use plan and enact integrated zoning ordinances
Through the Code, the responsibility for providing basic serviceswas shifted to local government units

5. The Passage of RA 7279: The Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992
December 14, 1987 – Senate Bill 234 filed and introduced by Sen. Lina
December 15, 1987 – Bills were referred to the Committee on Urban Planning, Housing and Resettlement and the Committee on Finance
1998 to 1990 – Seven public hearings were conducted by the Committees
August 15, 1991 – Committee on Urban Planning, Housing and Resettlement filed Committee Report No. 1397, recommending approval of a substitute SB 234
December 9, 1991 – SB 234 approved on the 3rd Reading; All 20 Senators present voted in favor of the bill
February 3, 1992 – Conference Committee Report was approved by the Senate
March 24, 1992 – RA 7279 UDHA Law was approved and signed into law by President Corazon C. Aquino
March 28, 1992 – Publication in two newspapers
March 29, 1992 – Date of effectivity

6. Features of RA 7279 Objectives of the Law
Uplift conditions of underprivileged and homeless citizens in urban and resettlement areas through decent housing at affordable cost, basic services and employment opportunities
Provide rational use and development of urban lands as a means of ensuring
Equitable utilization of residential lands in urban areas, focusing on the needs and requirements of underprivileged and homeless citizens and not simply on market forces;
Optimization of the use and productivity of land and urban resources;
Development of urban areas conducive to commercial and industrial activities which can generate more economic opportunities for the people;
Reduction in urban dysfunctions, particularly those that adversely affect public health, safety and ecology; and
Access to land and housing by the underprivileged and homeless citizens.

7. RA 7279 National Urban Development and Housing Framework
The Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB), under the direction of the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) shall formulate the National Urban Development and Housing Framework.
This framework includes:
a review and rationalization of existing town and land use plans, housing programs, and
provision for social housing and other related activities such as the development of livelihood programs, public transport systems, maintenance of ecological balance and monitoring of population growth in urban areas.

8. RA 7279 Supports Decentralization
Local government units are implementors of social housing programs. LGUs are expected to be more responsive to the hosing needs of their
Communities.
Moratorium on Eviction of Program Beneficiaries
Provides for a moratorium on the eviction of all program beneficiaries and the demolition of their dwellings for a period of three years from the effectivity of the law.

9. RA 7279 Private Sector Participation
Tapped the private sector’s capability and financial resources for social housing through such incentives as:
Simplification of qualification and accreditation requirements for
participating developers
Creation of a one-stop offices in the different regions of the country for the processing, approval and issuances of clearances, permits and licenses;
Simplification of financing procedures; and
Exemptions from taxes like capital gains tax for raw lands used for
socialized housing projects, value added tax for the project
contractor, transfer tax for both raw and completed projects, and
donor’s tax for lands donated for socialized housing.
Private developers of proposed subdivision projects required to set
aside am area for socialized housing equivalent to at least 20% of
total subdivision area.

10. RA 7279 Community Mortgage Program
Institutionalized community participation and initiative in the provision of social housing through the Community Mortgage Program (CMP), a major component of the law.
CMP is a mortgage financing program which assists legally organized associations of underprivileged and homeless citizens to own the land they occupy or where they choose to be relocated to.

11. RA 7279 Implementing Rules and Regulations
HLURB – Guidelines for the Inventory and Identification of Lands and Sites for Socialized Housing (Nov. 25, 1992)
HUDCC – Implementing Guidelines for the Acquisition, Valuation, Disposition and Utilization of Lands for Socialized Housing (May 20, 1993)
DOF – Guidelines for Equitable Land Valuation for Socialized Housing, pursuant to Sec. 13 of RA 7279 (Sept. 11, 1992)
DILG and HUDCC – Implementing Rules and Regulations Governing the Registration of Socialized Housing Beneficiaries

12. RA 7279 Implementing Rules and Regulations
HLURB – Guidelines on Balanced Housing (June 8, 1992)
DOF – Providing Incentives to Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations and Local Govt. Units as well as Private Sector Participating in Socialized Housing and Community Mortgage Program ( March 4, 1993)
DILG and HUDCC – Guidelines on the Observance of Proper and Human Relocation and Resettlement Procedures (Sept. 24, 1992)

13. National Urban and Housing Development Framework, 1993 – 1998
The Vision
Better quality of life for residents of cities/urban centers
Cities/urban centers as economic hubs and major contributors to national productivity and industrialization
Cities and urban communities are socially and environmentally healthy places
Cities and urban communities as centers for productive and income generating activities
Cities that house and deliver basic social services to its citizens, particularly the poor
Cities/urban centers promote political democratization through greater people participation in decision-making
Urban governments are capable and competent to address urban issues and concerns

14. National Urban and Housing Development Framework, 1993 – 1998
Basic Principles and Considerations
In over-all national development, urban development shall reinforce and complement rural development
Urban growth and development to complement natural and man-made investment
Level of future growth to be sufficient in quantity, quality, and distribution to provide opportunities (employment, housing, services, etc.) for all citizens
Cities/urban centers are valuable resources to be supported and their welfare are linked to the country’s welfare

15. National Urban and Housing Development Framework, 1993 – 1998
Basic Principles and Considerations
Urban resources will be developed to achieve multiple uses.
Land use and growth decisions are principally a local prerogative, supported by higher levels of government
People, private sector and other institutions shall play a primary role in building the nation’s cities. Principle of popular initiative and self-help shall b pursued with government as enabler and facilitator.
Harmonious relationships between the city/urban center and its environment, rural surroundings, and urban growth shall be assured
Enhanced urban life should allow enhanced individual welfare
Preservation and continued production of prime agricultural land shall be paramount

16. Implementing RA 7279 How was RA7279 Received?
It was viewed as the crowning achievement of the struggles of urban poor organizations, civic groups, non-governmental organizations and church groups.
Consultative processes in drafting the law participated in by: a) representatives of non-governmental organizations and people’s organizations, b) National Housing Authority (NHA), c) Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP), d)Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG)
It was noted that local government officials were not active participants in this process.

17. Implementing RA 7279 Issues and Concerns
LGUs not engaged in its formulation were opposing its implementation
LGUs and those undertaking demolition lacked awareness or refused to accept the procedures prescribed by the law
Initially, courts were more familiar with PD 772 which criminalizes squatting and judges issued issuing court orders dismissing petitions for restraining orders on illegal demolitions.
Some local chief executives admitted that they did not want to make an inventory of their land as the urban poor may occupy these areas.

18. Implementing RA 7279 Issues and Concerns
Local autonomy countered weak national sanctions and this resulted in local officials non compliance with requirements set to control forced evictions
NHA was traditionally responsible for providing resettlement sites and took care of relocation operations. LGUs tended to depend on NHA, who is unable to produce enough sites for the growing number of dislocated squatters.
DPWH and other national agencies’ projects were delayed due to their inability to move communities. Their lack of experience on relocation led to costly projects which beneficiaries found unacceptable.
With so many agencies involved in relocation, roles and accountabilities of these agencies were not well defined.

19. Implementing RA 7279 Issues and Concerns
Delayed Preparation of Land Use Plans and Identification of Social Housing Sites
LGUs lack information and political will
LGUs had no incentives to undertake these activities
LGUs had no resources allocated for these functions
Lack of LGU resources/capability for urban development
Strong market pressure to use land for commercial, industrial and infrastructure uses

20. Implementing RA 7279 Criticisms of UDHA
It created the squatting industry, as it gives incentives instead of penalizing or discouraging it.
The law penalizes local and national officials who coddle squatters, but no such officials have been prosecuted.
The law penalizes members of squatting syndicates. While well known to squatters who pay rent and protection money to these syndicates, no member of a syndicate has been convicted.

21. Implementing RA 7279 Criticisms of UDHA
Executive Order 152 designated the Presidential Commission on the Urban Poor (PCUP) as the clearing house for the demolition and eviction of squatters.
This EO requires local government units and other agencies to get a clearance from PCUP before anyone can eject or demolished squatter shanties.
PCUP requires a checklist (at least 12 items) of documents required to be attached to the application for clearance.
This executive order conflicts with RA7279 which designates local government units as the implementing arm of the law.