Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge Cooperative Restoration Project: Bringing back peatlands while reducing catastrophic wildfire threats Sara Ward,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge Cooperative Restoration Project: Bringing back peatlands while reducing catastrophic wildfire threats Sara Ward,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge Cooperative Restoration Project: Bringing back peatlands while reducing catastrophic wildfire threats Sara Ward, USFWS Raleigh Field Office TNC Fire and Pocosins Conference, October 11, 2011

2 Overview Introduction
Pocosins and fire regimes History of fire at PLNWR Recent NC peatland fires A tool for the toolbox – peatland restoration example, Pocosin Lakes NWR Restoration approach Restoration Benefits Costs Restoration Implications Summary

3 Pre-Alteration Pocosin Fires
Frequency: natural return interval determined by soil type, depth, water tableand vegetative community Severity: peat ground fire dependent on water table; mostly above ground fire 1962 pocosin distribution (Richardson 2003) Today: 70% habitat loss Histosols – fire return interval between 7 and 300 years Peat bogs with plant communities like those burned at PLNWR and GDSNWR: higher end of range In particular, AWC-associated return interval > 50 years Source: Frost, 1995

4 (in Frost, 19951) 1Frost, Cecil C Presettlement fire regimes in southeastern marshes, peatlands, and swamps. Pg in S.I. Cerulean and R.T. Engstrom, eds. Fire in wetlands: a management perspective. Proc. of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecol. Conf., No Tall Timbers Res. Station, Tallahassee, FL.

5 (in Frost, 19951) PISE = pond pine
1Frost, Cecil C Presettlement fire regimes in southeastern marshes, peatlands, and swamps. Pg in S.I. Cerulean and R.T. Engstrom, eds. Fire in wetlands: a management perspective. Proc. of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecol. Conf., No Tall Timbers Res. Station, Tallahassee, FL.

6 PLNWR Fire History Allen Road Fire March 1985 95,000 ac burned
Peat loss: ≤ 1 m Estimated C loss: million tons C1 Evans Road Fire 6/1/2008 – January 2009 40,704 acres Peat burned Non Federal land (private and NC State Park): 24” over 15,350 ac Federal land west of Western Rd – 12” over 16,100 ac Federal land east of Western Rd – 6” over 9,650 acres Estimated C loss: ~10 million tons C1 Credit: NCFS-Chris Carlson 1Michler and Welch, 2011

7 2011 Peatland Wildfires in NC
~ 88K acres burned to date: Source: InciWeb, Incident Information System,

8 So, why are we seeing more frequent and severe pocosin wildfires than predicted??
In a word…drainage! Historically: Summer water table drawdown (up to 1 m+1) in domed peat caused some peat fire; rewetting regularly occurred Seasonal soil saturation limited ground fire potential; allowed vegetation to burn (necessary in pocosin ecosystems) Now: Extensive drainage network limits duration of seasonal flooding Water table is lowered; peat is aerated/drier Drainage prevents even significant rainfall (tropical) retention on landscape Much more frequent ground fire; significant soil loss 1Ingram and Otte, 1982

9 Fire Return Interval: PLNWR

10 Fire Return Interval: GDSNWR
Predicted RI > 50 yrs; Actual – 3 yr. Wildfire recurring in footprint 2008 South One Fire footprint 2011 Lateral West Fire footprint

11 Above ground fuel reduction not always enough…need to address fire vulnerability of peat soils
Hydrology restoration Raises water table Allows water storage before (prevention) and during (suppression) wildfires Permits above ground fire for habitat and fire management with less risk Cost effective Many restoration “co-benefits” Credit: USFWS-V. Carver

12 Hydrology restoration: a tool for the practitioner’s toolbox
PLNWR Cooperative Restoration Project Example Photo: D. Suiter, USFWS Healthy pocosin wetlands

13 PLNWR : Refuge History Land south of Lake Phelps ditched /drained in 60’s for ag and peat mining Refuge established 1990 with a focus on pocosin restoration Hydrology restoration plan 1994 Restoration and research on-going since

14

15 Restoration Approach Install water control structures and culverts
Use raised roads along the canals as levees Re-saturate historically drained areas via rainfall Promote sheet flow via water level management Photo: S.Ward, USFWS Photo: E. Hinesley, NCSU

16 2008: PLNWR partial restoration likely helped
Infrastructure complete Infrastructure in progress Planned restoration Importantly, observations made during that fire documented that partially-restored pocosins burned far less than their neighboring drained lands. Undrained pocosins and areas where restoration work was complete did not burn.

17 Importance of pocosin restoration
Benefits beyond reducing wildfire threat/impacts: Carbon and nitrogen sequestration Restore wildlife habitat and threatened ecosystems Water quality Adaptation to climate change Human community benefits Photo: USFWS Water Quality Drainage network enhances Hg and nutrient delivery to sensitive downstream waters, this will fix it Aquatic Habitat Improve/reconnect important essential nursery habitat Anadromous fish use Terrestrial Habitat AWC globally threatened Pond pine canebrake critically endangered Adaptation to sea level rise by preventing incremental (oxidation) and catastrophic (burning) soil loss and promoting soil genesis Photo: SSEC

18 Pocosin restoration = ideal N & C offset
Peatland drainage promoted organic matter decomposition and loss of N and C to atmosphere Restoration stops soil loss: incremental (oxidation) and catastrophic (burning) Since acquisition in 1990, hydrology restoration a priority; project accelerated that effort Drained Condition loss of nitrogen, C and Hg via oxidation (SOURCE) Restored Condition nitrogen, C and Hg sequestration (SINK)

19 Emerging C Markets for “Rewetted” Peatlands
In NC peatlands, sequestration driver is amount C retained that would otherwise be lost without hydrology restoration Estimated sequestration potential: 200 lb/ac/year of N 6500 lb/ac/year of C Project sequesters the amount of C in ~82,000 tons of CO2/yr 2. Soil C as soil genesis reestablished 3. Amount in AGB Emphasize that estimates are being verified now by DUWC Equivalent to the average annual CO2 impact of 11,000 Americans Photo: E. Hinesley, NCSU

20 Costs of Restoration Conservative cost range for restoration on conservation lands between $140 (in- house) and $310 (contract) per acre We estimate PLNWR project cost of ~ $5M if work completed through external contracts One time investment… annual return Encourage group to think about the costs of not doing it… Photo: E. Hinesley, NCSU

21 Restoration Implications: Avoided Losses
Avoided loss of valuable ecological habitat Avoided wildfire response costs: Evans Rd – nearly $20M by Jan 2009 Juniper Road - $3.5M as of Pains Bay - >$14M as of ; up to $350K/day at peak Peat soils have potential value in C markets upon restoration C trading at $10/ton, peat worth up to $139M was lost during Allen Rd and Evans Road fires combined Peat soils exhaustible – fires can burn to depth of underlying mineral soil

22 Summary Restoration will not prevent fire in pocosins; just promotes return to more nature fire regime Frequency and intensity of fires in drained pocosins exceeds natural baseline for these fire-dependent habitats with significant costs Ecological community impact (e.g. globally threatened AWC) Fire fighting costs/resources in tough budget times Feet of soil loss in sea level rise vulnerable areas CO2 emissions equivalent to industrial releases Tourism and health impacts Evans Rd Fire – positive impact of partial restoration Partially-restored pocosins burned far less than neighboring drained lands Undrained pocosins and areas where restoration work was complete did not burn

23 Summary (cont.) Restoration is cost-effective preventative measure
Potential for restoration projects to be important in carbon markets Restored peatlands are a valuable resource Took geologic time to form; support unique habitats; rapid loss Value of peat lost exceeds $100M on Evans fire alone New partners / external funds focused on C or N may expand restoration and even acquisition in future C and N benefits and project costs estimated; 3-year verification study underway…those tools may help others with similar projects

24 Thanks! NCDENR William Ross Dempsey Benton NCSU Horticultural
Eric Hinesly U.S. Geological Survey Duke University Wetlands Center The Nature Conservancy Conservation Fund FWS - Raleigh Mike Wicker Tom Augspurger FWS - Refuges Howard Phillips Chris Lowie Mike Bryant Dave Kitts Wendy Stanton Fred Wurster Photo: Hollingsworth, USFWS

25 NC Pocosins with Restoration/Enhancement Potential

26 NC Pocosins with Restoration/Enhancement Potential

27 Juniper Road Fire, 2011 Left: June 19, Right: July 21, Photo Credit: USGS


Download ppt "Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge Cooperative Restoration Project: Bringing back peatlands while reducing catastrophic wildfire threats Sara Ward,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google