Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015

2 2 Scoring the Summative Rating 2015-2016 Instruction Professional Responsibilities Summative Rating Overall evaluation score All teachers Educational Practice

3 3 Scoring the Summative Rating 2015-2016 Leadership Professional Responsibilities Summative Rating Overall evaluation score All site administrators Educational Practice

4 4 Summary of Score Range Setting Process TLC: analyzed data from validation study results heard from stakeholders for recommendations based on 2014-2015 experiences reviewed other state systems engaged in lengthy analysis and discussion and unanimously recommended the scale below for teachers and administrators: IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.01.912.8 3.64.0

5 5 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points 2.8 3.6 Points Points 4.0 Points 3.63 Example 1: Highly Effective Educator ComponentRaw Ave ScoreWeightWeighted Score Instruction/Leadership3.600.802.88 Professional Responsibilities3.750.200.75 Sum of the Weighted Scores3.63

6 6 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points 2.8 3.6 Points Points 4.0 Points 3.38 ComponentRaw ScoreWeight Weighted Score Instruction/Leadership3.350.802.68 Professional Responsibilities3.500.20.70 Sum of the Weighted Scores3.38 Example 2: Effective Educator

7 7 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points 2.8 3.6 Points Points 4.0 Points 2.58 ComponentRaw ScoreWeight Weighted Score Instruction/Leadership2.600.802.08 Professional Responsibilities2.500.200.50 Sum of the Weighted Scores2.58 Example 3: Minimally Effective Educator

8 8 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points 2.8 3.6 Points Points 4.0 Points 1.82 ComponentRaw ScoreWeight Weighted Score Instruction/Leadership1.800.801.44 Professional Responsibilities1.90.20.38 Sum of the Weighted Scores1.82 Example 4: Ineffective Educator

9 9 Summative Rating 2015-2016 1.82 TLC Recommendation – Teachers and Administrators Final RatingOverall Score Range Highly Effective 3.6 – 4.0 Effective 2.80 – 3.59 Minimally Effective 1.91 – 2.79 Ineffective 1 – 1.9

10 10 Scoring the Summative Rating 2016-2017? Instruction/ Leadership Student Outcomes Professional Responsibilities Summative Rating Overall evaluation score All teachers/admin istrators Educational PracticeStudent Achievement TLC will revisit Summative Rating after Year 1 Implementation


Download ppt "NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google