1. Criteria for successful policy integration Oliver Lah 11-12/09/2014

2. SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 2 Criteria topics The policy’s alignment with broader priorities Supportive environment at the local level Striking a policy balance Facilitation of integration through cooperation Ensuring accountability during implementation and afterwards

3. SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 3 Policy alignment The policy’s alignment with broader priorities Alignment of the local policy with regional, national and EU-level frameworks and goals Integration of the policy into a broader local-level plan For example:  Munich’s TDP embedded in the broader plan, Perspektive München  The Netherlands’ national LEV policies synergies with EU laws

4. SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 4 Local support Supportive environment at the local level Openness to the take-up of solutions that originate from departments not directly involved with transport For example:  Lund’s and Munich’s inter-departmental consultation processes

5. SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 5 Policy balance Striking a balance in the policy measure(s) Policies that encourage complementary transport modes Creating complementary push and pull measures For example:  TDP’s aim of a modal shift toward cycling  The Netherlands’ Motor vehicle Tax and subsidies on LEVs

6. SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 6 Cooperation Facilitating integration through cooperation Clearly defined roles for inter-departmental cooperation and for interaction at various government levels Capacity-building for collaborative policy development Thinking, planning and acting as a wider urban area For example:  Lund’s and Munich’s cooperative processes  Krakow’s TeleBus, connecting outer areas

7. SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 7 Responsibility Ensuring accountability during implementation and follow-through: Policy implementation plan which ensures continued accountability across departments Re-evaluation of the policy at regular intervals For example:  Munich’s Planning Department is responsible for the TDP; other departments must consult them regarding transport-related projects  Lund’s update of LundaMaTs with a widened vision

8. Thank you for your attention! Oliver Lah oliver.lah@wupperinst.org