1. TeraGrid User Portal Migration Project Summery Jeff Koerner Director of Operations TeraGrid GIG Matt Heinzel Director TeraGrid GIG September 2009

2. 2 Agenda TeraGrid Internet Framework Project Internet Framework Pilot Contract Negotiations Round table updates Training TeraGrid User Portal Third Party Hosting RAT Current Events Links to RAT Documentation Next Steps – Matt Heinzel

3. 3 Timeline 1 of 7 10/13/07 TeraGrid Internet Framework Project High Level Goal: Increase TeraGrid's web presence via the User Portal, Web Site and Gateways to enable a more uniform look and feel, while facilitating user personalization & customization. – TeraGrid Internet Framework functional requirements include: Replacement of GridSphere due to lack of support Provide capabilities to customize and personalize user views, such as using “drag and drop” of various widgets, RSS feeds, calendar, news, etc. based on user preferences. Allow TeraGrid Web site, User Portal, Wiki, and potentially Science Gateways to all benefit by using the same web framework and facilitate development to a single documented uniform API and style. Provide content management capabilities to assure separation of content and presentation.

4. 4 Timeline (cont.) 2 of 7 – TeraGrid Internet Framework Environment requirements include: New Servers capable of supporting minimum requirements of software framework. Version control of portal source code. Secondary site redundancy (hot or cold). Timely maintenance of servers and updating of patches. Adhere to a defined supportable Service Level Agreement. Provide a 24/7 point of contact of administrative resources. Adoption of 99.95% standards – Maximum of 22 min of unplanned downtime a month.

5. 5 Timeline (cont.) 3 of 7 5/1/08 Internet Framework Pilot Completed – The following software packages were considered Catalyst, EnginFrame, Jboss, JetSpeed, Websphere, BEA & Liferay. – Liferay and Websphere were identified as two top candidates. – After the pilot it was concluded that Websphere would be used to implement the framework. 7/9/08 IBM announced willingness to negotiate on Websphere costs, provided preferred 3 rd party hosting vendor (Ascendent) is used. 9/25/08 An update on the Internet Framework project was given during the round table meeting, including the announcement that we would be moving the portal to Ascendent to receive preferred pricing with IBM.

6. 6 Timeline (cont.) 4 of 7 1/15/09 Individuals sent to Ascendent for Websphere training. 2/10/09 Licensing/pricing issues ultimately could not be resolved with IBM, resulting in the dropping of Websphere from consideration. – Due to this our alternate choice Liferay would be used. – Liferay to be hosted at Rackspace. – Established business relationship – Better pricing then Ascendent – Met all our environment requirements

7. 7 Timeline (cont.) 5 of 7 5/14/09 Request for people to participate in TeraGrid User Portal Third Party Hosting RAT. – Based on the concerns expressed by the Security Group, the TeraGrid User Portal Third Party Hosting RAT was initiated. The RAT's purpose was to identify and address any security related issues before moving forward with a 3 rd party vendor. 5/26/09 TGUP Third Party Hosting RAT Charter presented on TG Forum call & Follow-up e-mail was sent to TG Forum – Taken from Rat “The TeraGrid is migrating the TeraGrid User Portal (TGUP) from a RP site to a commercial third-party provider. The goal of this RAT is to identify issues with the move of the TGUP, as a critical piece of TeraGrid Infrastructure with a role in the TeraGrid single sign-on architecture, from a RP to the third party and make suggestions on how those issues should be addressed.”

8. 8 Timeline (cont.) 6 of 7 6/1/09 Third Party Hosting RAT group initiated – Members of RAT Mike Northrop (UC), Lead Jim Marsteller (PSC) Mike Pingleton (NCSA) Steve Mock (TACC) Sean McCreary (NCAR) Jim Basney (NCSA) Jim Rome (ORNL) JP Navarro (UC/ANL) Von Welch (NCSA) – The technique used in RAT follows: Summary of procedures and controls provided by the RP for the TGUP. Summary of procedures and controls provided by commercial provider. Identification of differences between items A and B with identification of priority of the differences. Recommendations for mitigating differences identified in item C that are determined to be important.

9. 9 Timeline (cont.) 7 of 7 6/18/09 Recommendations completed – 6/23/09 The findings of the RAT were presented to Matt, Von, and Dave H at TG09. 7/2/09 A response of the recommendations was sent to the RAT group and the RAT was closed. Current Liferay project - The teams would like to push the new web site and user portal in production by October 31, 2009. – The Liferay migration project is currently in progress and would like to push the new web site and user portal in production by Oct 31. – New servers are required for the Liferay project, delay of new servers will impact the Liferay project.

10. 10 Links to RAT documentation RAT WIKI Page: http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=TeraGrid_User_Portal_Third_Party_Hosting_R AT http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=TeraGrid_User_Portal_Third_Party_Hosting_R AT Working document of issues identified by team and recommendations: http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/images/7/7d/TGUP_RAT_Issues_List.xl s http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/images/7/7d/TGUP_RAT_Issues_List.xl s Summary of Recommendations: http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/images/0/01/TGUP_RAT_Recommendations.doc http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/images/0/01/TGUP_RAT_Recommendations.doc Response to Recommendations: http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/images/d/d3/TGUP_RAT_Reponse.pdf http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki/images/d/d3/TGUP_RAT_Reponse.pdf

11. 11 Next Steps