1. Building Large-Scale Data-Centric Applications with Silverlight Ramya Parthasarathy Roman Rubin

2. About us Roman Rubin – Wolters Kluwer roman.rubin@wolterskluwer.com Ramya Parthasarathy – Wolters Kluwer ramya.parthasarathy@wolterskluwer.com Wade Wegner – Microsoft wade.wegner@microsoft.com

3. CT Corporation is … The leader for registered agent, corporate compliance and governance solutions, CT Corporation's expertise defines every customer contact. Law firms and corporate legal departments turn to its reliable service organization and intelligent technology for the precision and speed they need.

4. About hCue CT’s hCue is a market-leading, web-based, secure entity management and board collaboration solution. It consolidates all your essential corporate data in one central repository, facilitates collaboration and information sharing across your organization and assists you to meet state and SEC Section 16 compliance requirements.

5. About hCue A large product in production for more than five years Currently approx 300+ active pages delivered using ASP.Net 2.0 platform with Oracle back-end (database) Multiple sub-sites (sub-domains and virtual directories) Approx 30 batches / Windows services Approx 200 tables moved to SQL Server, 400 SPs, 500 selects…

6. What to expect in this session How we packaged the application (XAPs/DLLs) Overview of Application Building Blocks for Silverlight Development (Instrumentation, Client Configuration, MVVM, Light-weight Web Services) How we deploy our Web Services (DX)

7. Packaging large Silverlight LOB Application

8. Application Packaging Initial download time (XAP size) Browser working set size Impact of long running application Maintainability

9. One large XAP model One HUGE XAP Module #1 HTML #1 Module #2 Module #3 Module #4 Application = One HUGE XAP Default model supported by tooling and default project templates Initial download time (XAP size) - Large Browser working set size - Large Impact of long running application - Impacted Maintainability - Difficult How does it stack up?

10. Primary XAP with DLLs model One HUGE XAP Module #1 HTML #1 Module #2 Module #3 Module #4 Primary XAP Module #1 HTML #1 Module #2 Module #3 Module #4 Application = One HUGE XAP Application = One Primary XAP + Multiple on-demand DLLs Initial download time (XAP size) – Can be controlled Browser working set size – Increases over time Impact of long running application – Impacted How does it stack up?

11. Multi-XAP model Primary XAP Module #1 HTML #1 XAP #2 Module #2 HTML #2 XAP #3 Module #3 HTML #3 XAP #4 Module #4 HTML #4 Application = Multiple modules (XAPs) each with independent URI Module #1 HTML #1 Module #2 Module #3 Module #4 Primary XAP Module #1 HTML #1 Module #2 Module #3 Module #4 Application = One HUGE XAP Application = One Primary XAP + Multiple on-demand DLLs Initial download time (XAP size) – Under control Browser working set size – Under control Impact of long running application – Mitigated Maintainability – Under control

12. Multi-XAP model Exercise care while partitioning to avoid constant switching between modules Data sharing between modules Fits in existing project templates and tooling support

13. Application Packaging - Summary Establish design objective for max XAP size Establish design objective for browser’s max- working-set-size Choose a model that fits your needs early in development. Start your application with at least two XAPs, even if you are only prototyping.

14. Multi-XAP model: Wrapper generation SLHost.axd Primary XAP Module #1 HTML XAP #2 Module #2 HTML XAP #3 Module #3 HTML XAP #4 Module #4 HTML xml Silverlight Object Tag related options Browser DOM

15. Multi-XAP model: Application Configuration SLHost.axd Primary XAP Module #1 HTML XAP #2 Module #2 HTML XAP #3 Module #3 HTML XAP #4 Module #4 HTML Silverlight Client Config. Providers Browser DOM Silverlight App Domain Client Config. API Encrypted Client Config Data blocks

16. Layout, Navigation Define a common Layout for our pages (MasterPage concept from ASP.NET world). Make Navigation between modules seamless Make Navigation in a “use-case” seamless

17. YourModule : UxModule : Application MasterPage : UxMasterFrame Header : UserControl LeftNavArea MyOrders: UserControl ContactUs: UserControl UxPageFrame EntitySearch : HCuePage ViewFrame’s optional footer UxViewFrame CustPreview : UserControl CustSearchResult : UserControl CustSearch: UserControl

18. Re-inventing ASP.Net mind-set Horizontally scalable packaging model with no upper limit Logical application that can span multiple XAPs Modules (or XAPs or Silverlight applications) Master Page Silverlight PageFrame, Pages,ViewFrame,Views, Abstract UX containers Heavyweight (PageFrame) and lightweight (ViewFrame) navigation scheme Consistent declarative navigation controls with declarative parameter bindings. Extensible “logical-application-level” Client Configuration

19. Instrumentation

20. Server-side and client-side Performance Log, Trace log and Error log Monitor health of production application Understand site-usage Trouble-shoot issues during an outage Defect fixing during development Performance tuning during development Server side: Stored to database Client side: In memory logging

21. Client-side Instrumentation Stored in memory. Therefore lives as long as the Silverlight application lives A sparse tree of loggers arranged by namespace in a hierarchical manner. Enforces upper limits on memory usage Provides embedded UI for reviewing logs, configuring logs, and exporting logs Can be configured to enable / disable logging at a node-level Can be configured to log only messages that meet a defined message level threshold

22. Instrumentation – Performance Log

23. Instrumentation – Trace Log

24. Instrumentation – Error Log

25. MV-VM Extensions

26. Visual Hierarchy – Perceived vs Actual An Use-case container… Transactions Review Search Result Search An Use-case container… Review Search Result XAML + Code-behind Search XAML + Code-behind Transactions XAML + Code-behind Perceived Actual VM

27. MV-VM Flexibility – Partitioning ViewModel An Use-case container… Transactions Review Search Result Search An Use-case container… Review Search Result XAML + Code-behind Search XAML + Code-behind Transactions XAML + Code-behind Perceived Actual VM

28. MV-VM - Questions As our use-case complexity increased we were struggling with many fundamental questions, some ‘philosophical’… What is the definition/scope/boundary of a ‘View’? How does composite Views fit in to the larger pattern? Who is responsible for ‘provisioning’ ViewModel? Is DataContext a good choice for attaching ViewModel to View? If we do not use DataContext, how can we do data-binding to substance of ViewModel? Can we provision ViewModel using Dependency Injection pattern (MEF for example…) Are we abusing the MV-VM pattern?

29. MV-VM Flexibilities An Use-case container… Transactions Review Search Result Search An Use-case container… Review Search Result XAML + Code-behind Search XAML + Code-behind Transactions XAML + Code-behind Perceived Actual VM ? ?

30. Our MV-VM Extended Implementation Can split / merge ViewModel with minimal impact Provisioning ViewModel – Can be provisioned declaratively (XAML) or using code – Not a static resource, can be attached to any FrameworkElement – Can attach multiple-view-models to parent UI container – Can be provisioned at any level of UI hierarchy – Strongly typed Connector model to declaratively bind to a ViewModel – Recycled when parent FrameworkElement goes out of scope Expression Trigger/Action/Behavior extensions for – Declarative binding to ViewModel substance – Route actions to ViewModel with parameter bindings.

31. Web Services Deployment

32. Service deployment UX www.wk.com One website for both UX and Services Easily set up by default templates Config file size and proxy count increase when more web services are added.

33. Service deployment UX api.wk.comux.wk.com UX (passive) and Services are segregated Requires more complex setup than first model

34. Service deployment UX api1.wk.comapi2.wk.comapi3.wk.com Services are partitioned to distinct end-points Tolerant UI can improve perceived availability Ease of service maintenance, enhancement and deployment ux.wk.com

35. Service deployment UX https://ux.wk.com Services are partitioned to distinct end-points Enables partial DR capability PRIMARY api3.wk.com api1.wk.com DR api3.wk.com

36. Service deployment Content Delivery Networks CDN used to push passive UI closer to end-user UX api1.wk.comapi2.wk.com ux.wk.com

37. Light weight proxy Generic service contracts – IDxService – Light-weight-strongly-typed proxy – Zero web.config entries (Convention over configuration) Sharing data contracts - Issues – Runtime parity between Silverlight and core.Net – Bindable data contracts

38. Service Deployment – Takeaways Consider partitioning UX from web-service Consider partitioning the services Consider writing UI that tolerates service unavailability Consider writing light-weight universal proxy and universal contracts. Consider these aspects from day #1

39. More…

40. More foundation challenges DataSource With client-side caching, paging, sorting and not tied to type-of-source Runtime discovery of composite parts Messaging Extending role-based security to Silverlight client Client side state management Client side cache management To-use or not-to-use Isolated storage What-if-out-of-browser?

41. Why Silverlight…

42. Why Silverlight? Compressed budget Under tight economy, the budget that we could afford was lower than our comfort zone. Compressed timeline Business wanted to have the product out much sooner than we were comfortable. Dense and interactive experience Compressed user-flow and dense screens that are highly interactive. Size was overwhelming We had to deliver many complex screens.

43. Questions? Need Answers? – Ramya Parthasarathy (ramya.parthasarathy@wolterskluwer.com)ramya.parthasarathy@wolterskluwer.com – Roman Rubin (roman.rubin@wolterskluwer.com)roman.rubin@wolterskluwer.com Don’t forget to fill out evaluation forms.