1. IAQG SPACE FORUM Report to General Assembly 11 October 2013, Montreal Contact: Roberto Ciaschi (European Space Agency)

2. The Space Forum in Montreal Roberto Ciaschi (ESA) [IAQG Lead] Page 2 Milt Jacocks (LMCO) Larry Patzman (LMCO) Steve Ogg (Raytheon) Eugene Jamarillo (Raytheon) Mike Swenson (Boeing ) Kevin Beard (NQA) AAQG Noriaki Shibuya (MHI) Yoko Nishio (MELCO) Satoshi Kikuchi (HIREC) Low Eng Sian (DSO – Singapore) APAQG Bénédicte Costedoat- Lamarque (Astrium) Andre La Croix (Astrium) Andreas Jain (DLR) Jacob Haham (IAI) EAQG Sigfried Brauner (Eurocopter) Axel-Gerd Weber (Cassidian) Guests

3. Space Forum highlights in Montreal Strategy SWOT of IAQG Space Forum Updated arrow chart Status of 2013 tactical objectives 9100:2016 revision Space Forum process and milestones Disposition of space comments 9104-3 revision Page 3

4. 4 Space Forum within IAQG: SWOT for its ability to bring value to the space community and IAQG Good understanding as a group of the needs and issues of space community Very similar methods and ‘language’ Balanced participation across sectors, industry and agencies Active culture on project and risk management, and design & development quality issues Limited resources Lack of continuity of membership Motivation of SF members / take work in between meetings Communication of added value of IAQG initiatives to our organizations Smaller w.r.t. Aviation and Defense Increased participation of final customers / agencies Better dialogue between space communities of the three sectors Influence the 9100 revision to increase value to space business Bringing the space views and needs in OPMT Raise the quality baseline of less mature suppliers Demonstration of benefits to our business Requirements / initiatives irrelevant for space or even counterproductive ‘Symbolic presence: being there with no effects Volunteers are not given the opportunity to contribute Bureaucracy of procedures perceived as excessive

5. 5 Space Forum within IAQG: SWOT for its ability to bring value to the space community and IAQG Good understanding as a group of the needs and issues of space community Very similar methods and ‘language’ Balanced participation across sectors, industry and agencies Active culture on project and risk management, and design & development quality issues

6. 6 Space Forum within IAQG: SWOT for its ability to bring value to the space community and IAQG Limited resources Lack of continuity of membership Motivation of SF members / take work in between meetings Communication of added value of IAQG initiatives to our organizations Smaller w.r.t. Aviation and Defense

7. 7 Space Forum within IAQG: SWOT for its ability to bring value to the space community and IAQG Demonstration of benefits to our business Requirements / initiatives irrelevant for space or even counterproductive ‘Symbolic presence: being there with no effects Volunteers are not given the opportunity to contribute Bureaucracy of procedures perceived as excessive

8. 8 Space Forum within IAQG: SWOT for its ability to bring value to the space community and IAQG Increased participation of final customers / agencies Better dialogue between space communities of the three sectors Influence the 9100 revision to increase value to space business Bringing the space views and needs in OPMT Raise the quality baseline of less mature suppliers

9. 9 1.Improve communication of sector SF with final customers and primes AAQG: increase customer reps to AAQG SF meeting & activities APAQG: JAXA & other countries’ final customers invited in JAQG/APAQG SF EAQG: reinforce participation of final customers 2.Flow down appropriate requirements, and reward compliant suppliers 3.Monitor IAQG initiatives with respect to space interests, and invest more resources to support & influence relevant ones 4.Contribute to definition of space competences of auditors and to oversight activities to identify opportunities for improvement 5.Share lessons learned and good practices at SF meetings. Liaise with other cooperation mechanisms between space organizations 1.Engagement of final customers’ and primes’ level of continuity of interaction is uneven 2.9100 is an accepted standard for QMS of space organizations, but not completely deployed 3.Consideration of space aspects in IAQG documents is inadequate 4.Added value of audits of space organizations sometimes affected by limited competence of auditors 5.Progress made, but exchange of experience across sectors is not sustained 1.Final customers and primes are consistently engaged, communicating their needs and obtaining solutions 2.9100 valued and implemented by all applicable suppliers of the space supply chain 3.Space needs reflected and incorporated in IAQG documents 4.ICOP provides added value auditing & certification to space organizations 5.Space Forum facilitates the exchange of lessons learned and good practices IAQG Space Forum - Strategy Current State Future State Ideas on How to Proceed A global forum for space quality issues – Space perspective across IAQG initiatives Update: 8 October 2013

10. 10 Final customers and primes are consistently engaged, communicating their needs and obtaining solutions 9100 valued and implemented by all applicable suppliers of the space supply chain Space needs reflected and incorporated in IAQG documents ICOP provides added value auditing & certification to space organizations Space Forum facilitates the exchange of lessons learned and good practices IAQG Space Forum - Strategy Future state Update: 8 October 2013

11. 2013 ObjectivesStatus Space Forum Collect and provide consolidated space inputs to the 9100:2016 revision, in accordance with the 9100 team requirements and timeline  Space Forum Support the completion of the 9104-3 revision, with a satisfactory incorporation of space comments and needs 2013 Tactical Objectives Space Forum Page 11 On plan Off plan, but recoverable Off plan, not recoverable Legend

12. Step 1 – Initial collection of comments from space sectors based on the current 9100:2009 - DONE First consolidation in the IAQG Space Forum meeting in Moscow - DONE Opportunity for additional comments and provision of consolidated comments by the deadline of 31 July - DONE Step 2 – Next round(s) on comments, based on new ISO 9001structure & ‘service oriented‘ text + existing 9100 supplements Working Draft (fall 2014) – 9100 based on ISO DIS Coordination draft (Q2 2015) – 9100 based on ISO FDIS 12 Space Forum contribution to 9100 revision - Process and milestones -

13. Statistics Rejected 10 Noted & closed1 Pending SF action3 Pending sub-team2 Pending ISO DIS1 Noted with action 1 Total18 Page 13 Space Comments: statistics & outcome Main comments are through (i.ie. NOT rejected) Prevention and mitigation of counterfeit and suspect parts Supplier’s oversight of sub-tier suppliers Root cause analysis for nonconformances Validation of test reports of critical materials Rigorous filter applied by 9100 Team, driven by the Design Specification Proposals for SCMH Synergies between Lean Management and 9100 Consideration of System Engineering

14. 9104-3 WG has produced Draft V0.A (30-SEP-2013) General principle defined in Annex F - competence requirements – is fully shared NOTE: This standard is not attempting to generate specific competencies for each Industry sector, but the overall minimum competencies to be able to audit effectively in any one of the three areas. The technical competencies described shall support the professional development of Aerospace Auditors. Space Forum has developed a draft of specific Knowledge and Skills for Space Small Task Force established in Montreal to refine current draft Comments to will be provided 9104-3 WG by mid December Contribution to 9104-3 revision Page 14

15. SWOT of Space Forum’s ability to bring value to the space community and IAQG has been a useful exercise Limited resources is our biggest weakness Updated arrow chart has confirmed our basic aims Our objectives for 2013 are achieved or on track Page 15 Conclusions