Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Brian P. Evans, Alongkot Ponlawat, Prasan Kankaew, and Jason H. Richardson Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences Spatial repellent evaluations.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Brian P. Evans, Alongkot Ponlawat, Prasan Kankaew, and Jason H. Richardson Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences Spatial repellent evaluations."— Presentation transcript:

1 Brian P. Evans, Alongkot Ponlawat, Prasan Kankaew, and Jason H. Richardson Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences Spatial repellent evaluations in Thailand AFRIMS, 7 Jan 09

2 Outline Background Hypothesis Semi-field tunnel design Spatial repellency evaluation Challenges Advantages Future studies Questions

3

4 Background Disease reduction is dependent on minimizing human- vector contact. Some approaches: –Skin repellents –ITNs/LLINs –Tarpaulins/tents –Clothing –Spatial repellents –Push-pull strategies

5 Background Most spatial repellents require a heat source to vaporize and release product. Metofluthrin: –Vaporizes at ambient temperature –Vapor pressure 100-fold greater than permethrin –Led to development of metofluthrin-treated paper and metofluthrin-impregnated plastic strips. Metofluthrin-impregnated plastic strips have not been evaluated against malaria vectors in Asia and against an Ae. aegypti colony from Thailand.

6 Metofluthrin-impregnated Net (MIN) SumiOne ® Net: - Kincho brand, Dainihon Jochugiku, Co., Ltd., Japan (Mushikonazu plate) - 60-d usage - 9 x 18 cm, 5.0 g - Metofluthrin content 5 % (w/w) + 95% ethylene-methyl methacrylate copolymer (w/w) AFRIMS, 7 Jan 09

7 Hypothesis In a semi-field tunnel study, significantly fewer host-seeking An. dirus and Ae. aegypti are attracted to a human-baited tent with a MIN relative to a human-baited tent without a MIN over the long-term.

8 Resident area Path Tree & grass area ~ 300 m Tunnel # 2 Tunnel # 1 Tent # 1, RTent # 2, L Tent # 3, RTent # 4, L AFRIMS, 7 Jan 09 Semi-field Tunnel Set-up

9

10

11

12 Spatial Repellency Evaluation MIN hung from inside of each treatment tent. 150 host-seeking Ae. aegypti or An. dirus released at mid-point during specific time interval. Interception traps emptied every hour by human volunteer acting as attractant. Sentinel cups used to determine the effect of distance on efficacy of a MIN. Mosquito net strips hung from tunnel to determine metofluthrin residual in non-treated fabric (WHO bioassay).

13 Ribbons placed outside the tunnel for WHO cone assays and GCs Sentinel Cup, 15 mos, 4 days old @ 10 m (4 cups) Control Treated ~ 50 m~ 2.4 m ~ 1.9 m AFRIMS, 7 Jan 09 Spatial Repellency Evaluation Treated Control ~ 50 m~ 2.4 m ~ 1.9 m ~ 300 m Tunnel # 2 Tunnel # 1 Tent # 1, RTent # 2, L Tent # 3, RTent # 4, L

14

15 Challenges Other creatures entering tunnel Calibration for An. dirus

16 Advantages Tropical climate year-round Insectary: 4 Anopheles species, Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus Expertise Field sites

17 Future activities Evaluations of additional candidate spatial repellents Semi-field large cage studies on “push”- “pull” technologies/approaches Surveillance/control devices

18 Acknowledgements Mosquito Biology section, AFRIMS MIDRP U


Download ppt "Brian P. Evans, Alongkot Ponlawat, Prasan Kankaew, and Jason H. Richardson Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences Spatial repellent evaluations."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google