1. Redesigning ENG 245 British Literature Chronology Truman State University Presented by Christine Harker and Patricia Gately, Associate Professors of English

2. Our Objectives in Redesigning Encouraging active learning Providing students with individualized assistance Establishing ongoing assessment and automated feedback Ensuring sufficient time on task and monitor student progress

3. Implementation Lecture time reduced 1-hour small group discussion with UGAs Online Assessment Supplemental Materials Online Supplemental Discussion Online

4. Examples of Online Materials

9. Midterm Student Evaluations for Pilot Study How helpful were the following in preparing students for the midterm?

10. Midterm Student Evaluations From Full Implementation Course How helpful were the following in preparing for the midterm?

11. Final Student Evaluations for Pilot Study How helpful were the following to overall learning?

12. Aesthetic Mode – Literature: Rubric for assessing learning Students who successfully complete the Aesthetic Mode of Inquiry-- Literature will develop and show some of the following features in their writing, observations, questions, and discussions: 5-highest 1-lowest 1) The ability to interpret a text by drawing on techniques of close, active, reflective reading; additionally, interpretation may include the use of primary and secondary sources and of other critical approaches 54321 2) The ability to analyze the formal elements, such as metaphors, analogies, etc., and relationships within a text to see how authors achieve responses in readers 54321 3) The ability to situate ideas within in historical, cultural or intellectual contexts, and/or the ability to address how literary studies may be informed by other disciplines and/or personal experience 54321

13. Final Grades in Pre-Pilot and Pilot Pre-Pilot A: 13 = 29.54% B: 12 = 27.30% C: 14 = 31.80% D: 4 = 9.09% F: 1 = 2.27% 44 total students Pilot A: 19 = 43.48% B: 14 = 30.43% C: 8 = 17.39% D: 2 = 4.35% F: 2 = 4.35% 45 total students

14. Midterm Grades in Pre-Implementation and Post-Implementation Courses Pre-Implementation A: 2 = 6.06% B: 8 = 23.24% C: 19 = 57.58% D: 2 = 6.06% F: 2 = 6.06% 33 total students Implementation A: 9 = 31.03% B: 8 = 27.59% C: 11 = 37.93% D: 0 = 0% F: 1 = 3.45% 29 total students

15. Comparison of Student Evaluations Pre-Pilot Strongly agree 15 Agree somewhat 16 Don’t agree or disagree 3 Disagree somewhat 2 Strongly disagree 0 Other 1 Pilot Strongly agree 17 Agree somewhat 12 Don’t agree or disagree 5 Disagree somewhat 0 Strongly disagree 1 Other 0 The course has accomplished its objectives:

16. Projected Cost Savings Non-redesign Course GRAND TOTAL $18,020 Total # of students 33 Cost per student $546 Original Projected Redesign Course GRAND TOTAL $12,240 Total # of students 75 Cost per student $163 Current Redesign Course GRAND TOTAL $12,240 Total # of students 30 Cost per student $408 Future Redesign Course GRAND TOTAL $12, 240 Total # of students 90 Cost per student $136