Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes."— Presentation transcript:

1 Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

2

3 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002 Changes in forest cover (shaded green) since the time of European settlement for Cadiz Township in southeastern Wisconsin. This pattern can be observed in many areas and illustrates both the changes in the abundance and spatial arrangement of forest in the landscape.

4 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002 Changes in conifer (green) and other forest types for a private and public landscape (2,500 ha) with similar initial conditions and rates of change that are relatively high for the ownership types. Landscape metrics were used to quantify the differences in landscape pattern between ownerships.

5 What is landscape pattern? Number of types Proportion of each type on the landscape Spatial arrangement of patches Patch shape Contrast between neighboring patches

6 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002 Two principal methods for representing spatial data in a GIS: vector-based representation and raster, or cell-based, representation.

7 Basic components of metrics Fraction or proportion (p) of landscape occupied Number of land cover classes present Probabilities of adjacency among classes Contagion or ‘clumpiness’ within a class

8 Basic components of metrics—patch based Patch area or size Patch perimeter Connectivity/fragmentation within a cover type class (e.g., mean interpatch distance) Patch shape and edge characteristics

9 Caveats for landscape pattern analysis

10 Landscape classification scheme all-important

11 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002 Examples of how the same landscape looks very different under different classification schemes. Both panels show how a 5- by 5-km section (100 grid cells) of southwestern Yellowstone National Park. (a) The landscape is classified based on forest community composition. (b) The landscape is classified based on successional stage of the forest stands.

12 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

13 Goals and objectives must precede calculations

14 Scale must be defined- grain and extent

15 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002 Effects of changing extent on a landscape of southwestern Yellowstone National Park. Note that the presence and relative proportions of the different land-cover types change as the extent of the map varies.

16 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

17 Identification of patches (shaded) on the same map using either (a) a four-neighbor rule, in which the horizontal and vertical neighbors are considered, but the diagonal neighbors are not, and (b) an eight-neighbor rule, in which the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal neighbors are all considered. Definition of what constitutes a ‘patch’ matters

18 Most metrics are correlated

19 One index is not sufficient--but how many? Three-dimensional pattern space in which three subregions of the southeastern United States are characterized by three landscape metrics. From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

20 Major limitation of any indices— information lost

21 A useful set of metrics-- Are selected for a particular objective Measured values are well-distributed over range Metrics are relatively independent

22 Research still needed— Relation of metrics/pattern to process Sensitivity of similar metrics for detecting change Statistical and sampling properties of metrics

23 From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

24 US Geological Survey/NASA http://astroboy.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthasart/index.html Garden City, Kansas Image taken 9/25/2000 Center pivot irrigation systems create red circles of healthy vegetation in this image of croplands near Garden City, Kansas. Garden City can be found on Landsat 7 WRS Path 30 Row 34, center: 37.48, - 100.51.

25 From Mladenoff et al. 1993

26

27

28

29

30

31 US Geological Survey/NASA http://astroboy.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthasart/index.html Florida Everglades Image taken 2/5/2000 Spanning the southern tip of the Florida Peninsula and most of Florida Bay, Everglades National Park is the only subtropical preserve in North America. It contains both temperate and tropical plant communities, including sawgrass prairie, mangrove and cypress swamps, pinelands, and hardwood hammocks, as well as marine and estuarine environments. The park is known for its rich bird life, particularly large wading birds, such as the roseate spoonbill, wood stork, great blue heron, and a variety of egrets. It is also the only place in the world where alligators and crocodiles exist side by side. The Everglades can be found on Landsat 7 WRS Path 15 Row 42, center: 26.00, -80.43.


Download ppt "Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google