Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mitigation at the Sector Level. Emissions by End Use End Use% % Road (cars, Trucks)9.9Cement3.8 Air1.6Other Industry5.0 Rail, Ship, Transport2.3Transmission.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mitigation at the Sector Level. Emissions by End Use End Use% % Road (cars, Trucks)9.9Cement3.8 Air1.6Other Industry5.0 Rail, Ship, Transport2.3Transmission."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mitigation at the Sector Level

2

3

4 Emissions by End Use End Use% % Road (cars, Trucks)9.9Cement3.8 Air1.6Other Industry5.0 Rail, Ship, Transport2.3Transmission and Distribution Losses 1.9 Residential Buildings9.9Coal Mining1.4 Commercial Buildings5.4Oil & Gas Extraction, Refining, Etc6.3 Unallocated Fuel Combustion3.5Forestation18.2 Iron and Steel3.2Agricultural Energy Use1.4 Aluminum/Non-Ferrous Metals1.4Agricultural Soils6.0 Machinery1.0Livestock & Manure5.1 Pulp, Paper, Printing1.0Rice Cultivation1.5 Food, Tobacco1.0Other Agriculture0.9 Chemicals4.8Landfills2.0 Wastewater, Other Waste1.6

5 How would you mitigate emissions from the following sectors? Electricity? Transportation? Industrial manufacturing? Land Use?

6 How would you mitigate emissions from the following sectors? Electricity? Transportation? Industrial manufacturing? Efficiency Fuel switching Reduce consumption Land Use Efficiency Product switching Reduce consumption

7 Should we be focusing on global mitigation or take a sector-by-sector approach? We’ll come back to this after we cover the Kyoto Protocol

8 Wedges Concept

9

10

11 What is a “Wedge”? A “wedge” is a strategy to reduce carbon emissions that grows in 50 years from zero to 1.0 GtC/yr. The strategy has already been commercialized at scale somewhere. 1 GtC/yr 50 years Total = 25 Gigatons carbon Cumulatively, a wedge redirects the flow of 25 GtC in its first 50 years. This is 2.5 trillion dollars at $100/tC. A “solution” to the CO 2 problem should provide at least one wedge.

12 Energy Efficiency & Conservation (4) CO 2 Capture & Storage (3) Stabilization Triangle Renewable Fuels & Electricity (4) Forest and Soil Storage (2) Fuel Switching (1) 15 Wedge Strategies in 4 Categories Nuclear Fission (1) 20072057 8 GtC/y 16 GtC/y Triangle Stabilization

13 A few caveats Some of the proposals have moderate to significant environmental or political downsides – E.g., nuclear waste storage not yet resolved Actual emissions reductions subject to dispute – E.g., some studies suggest that life cycle emissions of natural gas production from shale are greater than coal over 20-year period; biofuels another area of controversy

14 Double the fuel efficiency of the world’s cars or halve miles traveled Produce today’s electric capacity with double today’s efficiency Use best efficiency practices in all residential and commercial buildings Replacing all the world’s incandescent bulbs with CFL’s would provide 1/4 of one wedge Efficiency There are about 600 million cars today, with 2 billion projected for 2055 Average coal plant efficiency is 32% today E, T, H / $ Photos courtesy of Ford Motor Co., DOE, EPA Sector s affected: E = Electricity, T =Transport, H = Heat Cost based on scale of $ to $$$

15 Substitute 1400 natural gas electric plants for an equal number of coal-fired facilities A wedge requires an amount of natural gas equal to that used for all purposes today Fuel Switching Photo by J.C. Willett (U.S. Geological Survey). E, H / $

16 Implement CCS at 800 GW coal electric plants or 1600 GW natural gas electric plants or 180 coal synfuels plants or 10 times today’s capacity of hydrogen plants Graphic courtesy of Alberta Geological Survey Carbon Capture & Storage There are currently three storage projects that each inject 1 million tons of CO 2 per year – by 2055 need 3500. E, T, H / $$

17 Triple the world’s nuclear electricity capacity by 2055 Nuclear Electricity Graphic courtesy of NRC The rate of installation required for a wedge from electricity is equal to the global rate of nuclear expansion from 1975-1990. E/ $$

18 Wind Electricity Install 1 million 2 MW windmills to replace coal- based electricity, OR Use 2 million windmills to produce hydrogen fuel Photo courtesy of DOE A wedge worth of wind electricity will require increasing current capacity by a factor of 30 E, T, H / $-$$

19 Solar Electricity Photos courtesy of DOE Photovoltaics Program Install 20,000 square kilometers for dedicated use by 2054 A wedge of solar electricity would mean increasing current capacity 700 times E / $$$

20 Biofuels Photo courtesy of NREL Using current practices, one wedge requires planting an area the size of India with biofuels crops Scale up current global ethanol production by 30 times T, H / $$

21 Natural Sinks Photos courtesy of NREL, SUNY Stonybrook, United Nations FAO Eliminate tropical deforestation OR Plant new forests over an area the size of the continental U.S. OR Use conservation tillage on all cropland (1600 Mha) B / $ Conservation tillage is currently practiced on less than 10% of global cropland

22 International Treaties and the Climate Change Negotiations

23 Most Important Concepts Underlying International Lawmaking?? State Sovereignty – Each state is a sovereign actor, and states will protect their sovereignty to the greatest extent when developing treaties Consent – Must have evidence of consent to “bind” a state – whatever “binding” may mean – to an international obligation

24 The Climate Change Treaty Process and Politics 2 Treaties – UNFCCC (1992) – Kyoto Protocol (1997) = a protocol to the UNFCCC UNFCCC provides the framework, Kyoto Protocol helps to implement it Parties meet multiple times/year + have one official meeting each year = Conference of the Parties

25 The Politics Developed v. developing Divisions within developing countries EU v. U.S. Economies in transition

26 The Politics Developed v. developing

27

28

29

30 The Politics Developed v. developing – Historical emissions v. current and future emissions – Industrial emissions v. land use emissions – Wealth/development v. desire to develop – Cause of the harm v. will suffer much of the harm

31 The Politics Divisions within developing countries – AOSIS (small island nations) – OPEC (oil producing nations) – China – India – Brazil + other heavily forested countries – Africa/ least developed countries

32 The Politics Divisions within developing countries – AOSIS (small island nations) Big GHG reductions + $ for adaptation – OPEC (oil producing nations) No reductions + $ if lose oil production – China Reductions only if does not affect growth – developed countries go first – India Same as China

33 The Politics Divisions within developing countries – Brazil + other heavily forested countries Reductions from industrial sources, not forests But if from reduced deforestation, want $ – Africa/ least developed countries Want $ and development assistance

34 The Politics EU v. U.S. – EU wants emissions reductions, but wants to achieve those reductions as a region, not on country-by-country basis – U.S. opposes emissions reductions, especially if developing countries like China do not have obligations

35 The Politics Economies in transition (EITs) = countries that were part of the former Soviet Union – When the Soviet Union collapsed, so did their economies – They are “industrialized,” but have damaged economies – The have reduced emissions because of collapse – They don’t have any money

36

37 Economies in Transition – Hot Air

38 The Climate Change Treaty Process and Politics When you consider the politics, it’s amazing the parties reached any agreement at all, but they did – UNFCCC

39 UNFCCC

40 1992 treaty “Framework” treaty – designed to establish the basic structure and goals of the Parties – Often very vague about specifics

41 UNFCCC Most important aspects – Objective = overall goal for the treaty – Divides parties into different categories – Establishes moderate commitments – Applies to 6 greenhouse gases – Requires parties to meet every year to assess whether the existing commitments will meet the objective

42 Art. 1 - Definitions – Key Terms Emissions = release of GHGs and/or precursors into atmosphere over specified area/time GHGs – not just carbon dioxide Reservoir = component of climate system where GHGs are stored Sink = process, activity, or mechanism which removes GHGs from atmosphere Source = any process or activity which releases GHGs into atmosphere

43 Art. 2 - Objectives Stabilization of GHG concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. within a time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner

44 Art. 4 - Commitments All Parties, Annex I Parties, Annex II Parties – All = developed, developing, economies in transition – Annex I = developed + economies in transition – Annex II = developed

45 Art. 4 - Commitments Developed – Europe, United States, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada – And former Soviet countries (EITs) Russia, Ukraine, Lithuania, etc. Developing – Any other party – e.g., China, India, all countries in South America, Africa, most of Asia, Middle East

46 All Parties = Developed + Developing Annex I = Developed Annex II = Developed/Not EITs

47 Art. 4.1 – All parties 1. All Parties, taking into account their common but differentiated responsibilities, shall:

48 Art. 4.1 – All parties (a) develop national inventories of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of GHGs (b) Develop programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change

49 Art. 4.1 – All Parties (c) promote and participate in technology transfer (d) promote sustainable management of sinks and reservoirs

50 Art. 4.1 – All Parties (j) communicate results to the Conference of the Parties

51 Art. 4.2 – Annex I parties (a) Developed country parties shall – adopt national policies and take corresponding measures on the mitigation of climate change, by limiting its anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and protecting and enhancing its greenhouse gas sinks and reservoirs.

52 Art. 4.2 – Annex I parties (a) These policies and measures will demonstrate that developed countries are taking the lead

53 Article 4.2 – Annex I parties (b) Parties shall communicate to the Secretariat about their efforts

54 Article 4.2 – Annex I parties (d) The Conference of the Parties will meet to determine if the efforts are working to meet the objective of the UNFCCC

55 Art. 4.3 – Annex II Parties Annex II Parties – Developed countries, except for “economies in transition”

56 Art. 4.3 – Annex II Parties Annex II parties must – Provide funding to non-Annex I parties for emissions inventories – Help transfer technology – Help fund adaptation

57 Importance of UNFCCC? Structure – Negotiating framework – GHGs/basket of gases – Definitions The overall objective Different commitments based on the parties Funding mechanisms Information dissemination

58 UNFCCC Structural importance – Developed countries must take the lead to reduce emissions – Developing countries do not have obligations to reduce emissions – but should inventory and report – Parties will meet to determine if they need to do more


Download ppt "Mitigation at the Sector Level. Emissions by End Use End Use% % Road (cars, Trucks)9.9Cement3.8 Air1.6Other Industry5.0 Rail, Ship, Transport2.3Transmission."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google