Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005."— Presentation transcript:

1 Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005

2 Phase-Contrast Radiography  Traditional radiography uses differences in absorption to develop images  Phase-contrast Radiography (PC-R) uses differences in refraction and diffraction of the x-ray beam as it passes through the object  Results in enhanced edge effects in image compared to those found in absorption images

3 Objectives  Build a device that aids in testing Phase Contrast Radiography parameters  Computer controlled movement of the object and detector  Maintain high control accuracy in order to pick up edges in tissue

4 PC-R Potential  Edge Enhancements  Has potential to detect objects that are invisible on conventional radiography due to edge enhancements in images.  Monochromatic  Tunable to specific wavelengths  Monochromatic beam reduces excess radiation dosage to patient.

5 Spatial Coherence  Description of the divergence of a wave  Desire a very large spatial coherence (d): decrease focal spot size (f) increase source-object distance (R 1 )  Waves similar enough for interference patterns to form when passing through edges of object

6 Edge Effects  Waves near edges are bent  Waves not touching or passing through are not affected  Edge enhancement seen on film  Angle shift insignificant at close distances

7 Producing Phase Contrast  Image has two components: absorption and phase  Wavelength is tunable due to monochromatic source  Components functions of position  Goal is to divide out absorption  Absorption component  detector touching object

8 Magnification Effect  Changing R 1 +R 2  Size of two images are not equal  Scale images to account for magnification  Most likely shrink I to I abs for division  Poor accuracy will result in production of false edges

9 Our Device Main Uses: Optimizing distances for PC imaging of specific objects/tissues Produce reproducible images Produce no false edge effects Images using scattering, defines pixel resolution < 150 microns Additional Uses: Rotational movement for CT images

10 Programming  Inputs:  LabView GUI: positions, energy  Outputs:  Time/Date  Image #  Angle and x, y, z positions  Energy Used

11 Advisors  Advisors:  Frank E. Carroll, M.D.  Gary Shearer  Robert Traeger  Principal Investigator:  Edwin Donnelly, M.D.,  Ph.D. from Vanderbilt in Biomedical Engineering

12 Facilities  W.M. Keck Free Electron Laser Center at Vanderbilt  Vanderbilt BME Department

13 Resources  Monochromatic X- ray source at FEL  LabVIEW and Virtual Instruments  Stages, controllers, etc… for design construction provided by FEL & outside contractors

14 Design Schematic -Detector has z-stage movement (1m) -Object has x (6cm), y (5cm), rotational (360 degrees) movement

15 Components

16 Selected Components Microcontroller Linear Translation Stage (z)

17 Questions?


Download ppt "Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google