1. 1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document and Preview of Feedback from PMs + Editor 20091103 Draft C N.Toge

2. 2 What this thing is This is a preview of what would come as the first (or second?) feedback from the PMs and the editor, concerning your initial draft. We will go through this (most likely updated one by then thru a small face-to- face meeting at KEK) at the webex meeting this week (2009/11/5).

3. 3 Tamplate: Section Title () Outline on the web? Zeroth draft on the web? System / Layout description? Tables / Illustrations? Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? Cost implications? Remarks –Title colors GREEN = Fairly advanced for this stage BLUE = Reasonable for this stage MAGENTA = Lacking zeroth draft. Need work. RED = Lacking outline. Need work real urgent!

4. 4 Introduction (PMs) Outline on the web? –Sort of Zeroth draft on the web? –No Remarks –Must identify the specific individual to draft –ETA: 2009/11/5

5. 5 SB2009 Overview (PMs) Outline on the web? –Barely Zeroth draft on the web? –No Remarks –Must identify the specific individual to draft –Must produce clear guidance, in a written form, as to Low-current  high-current transition Low-energy operation –ETA: 2009/11/5

6. 6 SB2009 Layout (PM + Paterson) Outline on the web? –No Zeroth draft on the web? –No Remarks –Must identify the specific individual to draft –What is our position the beamline length issues at this moment? (Ready to give a solution case, or will work out later, etc) –ETA: 2009/11/5

7. 7 Parameters (PMs) Outline on the web? –Sort of Zeroth draft on the web? –No Remarks –Latest reference is the last table in http://ilc.kek.jp/TDP/DESYMeeting200905.pdf except the low power / no power no travelling focus IP params which need to be checked. http://ilc.kek.jp/TDP/DESYMeeting200905.pdf –Must identify the specific individual to draft  Toge for now –ETA: 2009/11/5

8. 8 Gradient Issues (Yamamoto) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –No Remarks –Zeroth draft, when? 2009/11/5

9. 9 Injectors / Sources - Electrons (Brachmann) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes System / Layout description? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –Yes –Need to mark up the (minor) changes wrt RDR. Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –R/D issues: Yes –Need an itemized list (or a tabulation) of design issues to pursue? Cost implications? –TBC Remarks

10. 10 Injectors / Sources - Positrons (Clarke) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –No. When is it available? System / Layout description? –No Tables / Illustrations? –Not yet Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –Not yet Cost implications? –TBC Remarks

11. 11 Damping Rings (Guiducci) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes System / Layout description? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –Yes Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –Yes –Is the D.A. issue known to be OK, in terms of particle yield (in particular for posis)? If so (or not), please make a statement. Cost implications? –TBC Remarks

12. 12 RTML (Solyak) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes System /layout description? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –Yes –Would be good to have a tabled comparison with RDR Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –200 micron bunch length no longer supported – Eveyone please, confirm, that this is OK. Cost implications –TBC Remarks

13. 13 KCS (Nantista) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes System / Layout description? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –Need illustrations (unit concept, system layout) –Need tables (system params, component params, RF power accounting including LLRF aspects) Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –Consistency with the reduced beam power case –More itemized description desirable. –Need statements on thermal implications wrt cooling requirements. –Need statements on R&D + system validation plans Cost impacts? –TBC Remarks

14. 14 DRFS (Fukuda) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes System / Layout description? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –Need better illustrations (unit concept, system layout) –Need tables (system params, component params, RF power accounting including LLRF aspects) Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –Consistency with the reduced beam power case –More itemized description desirable. –Need statements on implications wrt cooling requirements. –Need statements on R&D + system validation plans with more contents Cost impacts? –TBC Remarks

15. 15 BDS (Seryi) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –No; when can we see one? System / Layout description? –Not yet Tables / Illustrations? –Not yet Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –Not yet Cost impacts? –TBC Remarks

16. 16 CFS (Kuchler) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes System / Layout description? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –Draft illustrations prior to ALCPG, yet not part of SB2009 proposal doc –Must identify key illustrations to use, and circulate them. Risks / Implications / Open Design Issues / Plans description? –Need statements on The notion that the single-tunnels can accommodate the expected hardware components. Single-tunnel power/cooling issues Single-tunnel safety issues Single-tunnel installation schedule issues, is possible. If not, identify this as an open issue to pursue during TDP2. Cost impacts? –TBC Remarks

17. 17 Costing (Garbincius) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –Yes Methodology discussion? –Yes Tables / Illustrations? –WIP Remarks

18. 18 Risk Analysis (Ross) Outline on the web? –Sort of Zeroth draft on the web? –No; when can we see one? Methodology description? –No Tables / Illustrations? –No Remarks

19. 19 Availability Analysis (Ross) Outline on the web? –Yes Zeroth draft on the web? –No; when can we see one? Methodology description? –No Tables / Illustrations? –No Remarks