1. 1 Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – Tamil Nadu On 08.03.2011

2. Review of Implementation of MDMS in TAMIL NADU (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2010 to 31.12.2010) Part-I Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Coverage : Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (Pry) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of Institutions 99%97%

4. Coverage Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (U. Pry) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of Institutions 100% 107%

5. Coverage : Children Approval Vs Achievement (Pry) No. of Children (in lakhs) 86 % 103 % 84 % Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Coverage : Children Approval Vs Achievement (U. Pry) No. of Children (in lakhs) 94% 100%94% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (Pry) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of Working Days 100 % 99 %

8. Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (U.Pry) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of Working Days 106 % 100% 99%

9. Approval Vs Achievement: Number of Meals (Pry + UPry.) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of Meals (in crore) 87%105% 88%

10. Foodgrains : Availability & Utilisation (1.4.10 to 31.12.10) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 131216 MTs 74721 MTs 70959 MTs 10 4658MTs

11. FOOD GRAIN : ALLOCATION vs. UTILISATION Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Quantity in MTs 59% 54%

12. Foodgrains Availability – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Special focus Dist.: Chennai (41%), Erode (45%), Tiruvarur (48%) & Trichy (49%)

13. Foodgrains Utilisation – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Special focus Dist.: Chennai 32%), Erode (44%), Sivagangai (46%)

14. Payment of cost of Food grains to FCI Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Cost of Food Grain (Rs. In Lakh ) 82%

15. COOKING COST: ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Rs in Lakh 64% 75%

16. Approval Vs Achiievment Engagement of Cooks-cum-Helpers during 1.4.10 to 31.12.10 No. of CCH Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 95% Primary + Upper Primary

17. Honorarium to Cooks-cum-Helpers Rs. In Lakh Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (66% ) Central Share in allocation : 8776 Lakh State Share in allocation : 46709 Lakh

18. MME: ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Rs in Lakhs 25% 22% 7%

19. Transportation Assistance : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Rs in Lakhs 56% 20% 34%

20. Achievement up to 2010-11 (Kitchen cum Stores) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 20 1829 8966 3682 Total Sanctioned : 14340 Kitchen Cum Stores

21. Achievement up to 2010-11 (Kitchen Devices) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 21 Total Sanctioned : 41285 units of Kitchen Devices

22. Coverage : School Health Programme and Inspections ) No. of Institutions Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 22 65% 76%

23. SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. ComponentAchievementBenchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 57%80% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 54%70% 3. Payment to FCI (Bills recd.) 82%100% 4. Cooking Cost Utilisation 64%70% 5.MME Utilisation 22%75% 6.Tran. Asst. Utilisation 34%80% 7.Kitchen Shed construction 13%100% 8.Kitchen Devices procurement 61%100% 9.QPRs received 3nos. 10.Inspections 65%75% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 24

25. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India  Meeting of State level Steering cum Monitoring Committee held on 30.07.2010. SSMC Meeting

26. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Two Institutes engaged for evaluation 1.Queen Mary’s College Conducted a study Highlights  98% Students preferred new menu suggested by the College  Thiamine, Niacin deficiency is very minimal  Mild riboflavin deficiency is high  Iron Deficiency is high among girls. Evaluation Study

27. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Two Institutes engaged for evaluation 2.Gandhigram Rural Institute Highlights  The over all health status of children improved  Children have become energetic  The incidence of diseases has reduced  Children’s health and education improved. Evaluation Study

28. Grievance Redressal Mechanism Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India  At State level Grievance Redressal Cell has been established.  A complaint register is also maintained by the Admin.Superintendent  Action is taken to get toll free number to make complaints by the public.  Very soon the Grievance Redressal Cell is also to be established at District/Block//Village school Level.

29. Community Involvement Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India  PTA /VEC/ Mothers’ Committee  PRI is involved in monitoring the implementation.

30. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2011-12 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2010-11 (Primary) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 2011-12 (Proposed) Q-3 Q-2 31 Q-1 27

32. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availed MDM during 2010-11 (Upper Primary) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 2011-12 (Proposed) Q-1 Q-2 32 Q-3

33. Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Already Engaged Additional requirement (2011-12) Cook-cum- helper 1,11,72315,582 33

34. Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of institutions Sanctioned Constructed through convergence Gap 34,40814,3407,65012,418 34

35. Proposal for Procurement of Kitchen Devices Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India No. of institutions Sanctioned Procured through convergance Gap 42,43541,28501,150 35

36. Proposals and Recommendations Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India S. No componentPAB Approval 2010-11 Proposal 2011-12 Recommendati on1 Children (Pry) 320360527293172730000 2 Children (U Pry) 182323817198941720000 3NCLP172591638116400 4 Working Day (Pry and U Pry) 220- Pry 220 – U Pry 312-NCLP 220 – Pry 220 – U Pry 312-NCLP 220 – Pry 220 – U Pry 312-NCLP 5 Kitchen cum Store 9,04012,41812,418 6 Cook cum Helper 15,58215,582 7 Kitchen Devices 412851790418000 8 Draught affected area NANANA 9 MME Plan Not submitted 36

37. ISSUES Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India  In adequate availability of Foodgrain in Chennai (41%)  Mismatch in Cooking Cost (64%), Foodgrain (54%) and TA (34%)  No coverage of NCLP Schools 37

38. Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India