1. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 WG42 Upcoming NWIP for IS 42030 Architecture Evaluation Invitation to IEEE for Early Informal Comments at WICSA 2011 Workshop on Standards for (software) Architecture 24 June 2011 Steven W. Mitchell, US TAG Lockheed Martin Fellow

2. Agenda ISO/IEC 42030 – Architecture Evaluation Forward Plan Actors and Use Cases Consolidated Activities Preliminary Conceptual Architecture Conformance Concept IEEE Feedback Missed or Erroneous Use Cases Missing Architectural Concepts Other Comments and Suggestions

3. Plan for 42030 Architecture Evaluation Overview of IS 42030 NWIP Schedule Extended Process (4 years from NWIP to IS) July 2011 NWIP going out for ballot Nov 2011 prepare 42030 WD1 May 2012 prepare 42030 WD2 42030 NWIP Ballot Will Be Accompanied by Annotated Outline including key diagrams

4. IS 42030 Outline Table of Contents

5. IS 42030 Users

6. 42030 Use Case Model

7. IS 42030 Architecture Quality Use Cases

8. IS 42030 Architecture Description Quality Use Cases

9. IS 42030 Concerns and Inference Use Cases

10. IS 42030 Decision Use Cases

11. IS 42030 Process Use Cases

12. Consolidated activities Assess Architecture Assess Implications of Findings Review the Findings Frame the Problem Communica te Results Determine the Analysis Techniques and Tools Assess Findings Collect and Understand Required Info time Manage AE (Plan, Monitor, Assess, Control, Learn) Develop Recom mendati ons Determine Evaluation Critera

13. IS 42030 Architecture Description Evaluation

14. IS 42030 Architecture Evaluation

15. Conformance Concept The requirements in this International Standard are contained in Clauses 6, 7 and 8. An Architecture Evaluation conforms to this International Standard if it satisfies the requirements of Clauses 6 and 7. An Architecture Review Method conforms to this International Standard if it satisfies the requirements of Clause 7 A Software Product delivering capabilities of Architecture Evaluation conforms to this International Standard if it satisfies the requirements of Clause 8.

16. IEEE Feedback Missing or Erroneous Use Cases 1. 2. 3. 4. Missing Architectural Concepts 1. 2. 3. 4. Other Comments and Suggestions 1. 2. 3. 4.

17. Thank You For Your Comments and Suggestions!