1. Multi-State Hazardous Waste Information Exchange WasteX February 28 – March 1, 2005

2. Outline Purpose Prove the concept of data exchange between states using the Node Business Area Interstate Hazardous Waste shipments WasteX Node demonstration WA to OR and OR to WA and WA to WA Next Steps Example Generic Interface Prototype Manifest Discrepancy Report Conclusions Recommendations eFiling in Washington – impacts for the Node

3. Purpose Prove the concept of data exchange between states using the National Environmental Information Exchange Network (NEIEN) Is the technology needed available? What is the level of effort? Build the flow without a national standard? Can we create a new flow using the existing Nodes at two states (WA and OR)?

4. Business Area: Interstate Shipments of Hazardous Waste (HW) Those who generate HW must send it to a Treatment Storage Disposal Recycling facility (TSDR) which is permitted for that type of waste. Large Quantity Generators must report on a Generation and Management form (GM). TSDR s must report the waste they receive on a Waste Received form (WR).

5. Business Area: Interstate Shipments of Hazardous Waste (HW) The “Implementer” (Tribe, State…) must have a solution to manage the information, and provide data to EPA every other year (2001, 2003 …) EPA stores data in the Biennial Report System (BRS) – now part of RCRAInfo. BRS provides some reconciliation between implementers, but only every other year at a company level.

6. Hazardous Waste Movement from Washington 79,982,082 pounds 10,141 manifests

7. Data Management of Hazardous Waste Shipments (HW) The Node presents an opportunity for On-Line data sharing of HW manifest data: “Did they receive what we sent?” Implementers can place data on their Network Node as soon as it is available

8. Washington and Oregon Washington State and Oregon require annual submissions of data. Track HW shipments by manifest. WA and OR have similar solutions.

9. Manifest Tracking Systems Evolution between WA and OR TurboWaste.Net HazWaste.Net HWIMSy Washington Oregon NodeNode WasteX

10. HW Movement between WA – OR (WA TurboWaste.Net data only) WA OR 2,448 manifests 43,340,000 lbs 3,712 manifests 32,760,000 lbs

11. WasteX Application Topology

12. Node Flow Example (WasteX Query) RequestorProvider (STATE) AGENCY NODE PROGR. RDBMS Query Processor Data Request Authenticate at NAAS Perform Query Node Management Request received Account/Service Authorized at NAAS Request logged (Access, Query, Parameters etc.) Data Transformation Query parameters parsed Relational data retrieved XML transformation Schema validation AGENCY NODE Node Management Request results logged XML payload returned Data Received Response logged Payload staged Data available to the user TurboWaste.Net Application TurboWaste.Net Application

13. Partner Node Node FacadeRequestor Client Application Node Data Node Admin Node Data Sources Submit GetStatus Query Authenticate Execute Notify Download Solicit NodePing GetServices Node Engine Transaction Service Fault Account Client Application Node Information Flow Diagram

14. Let’s take the Node for a test drive

15. TurboWaste main screen Node Demo WAD041337130 Enter ID # Click Search

16. Company Search Results Node Demo Click View Reporting History

17. Company Waste Stream Listing Node Demo Click View for a single waste stream

18. Waste Shipment Detail – Link to Node Node Demo Link icon means Node link WA – WA WA – OR OR – WA OR - OR

19. WasteX Results - Matching WA Generator and WA TSD Node Demo All shipment data reported received at TSD Facility Selected Generator

20. Node Demo Shipments sent by Generator Data from Oregon Node Selected TSD Shipments received by TSD WasteX Results - Matching WA TSD and OR Generator

21. Opens the data for our field inspectors Data Sharing Challenges  Exposes data quality problems Opens the data for review Exposes data quality problems

22. Next Steps for WasteX Is WasteX the right application for determining manifest discrepancy reporting? Develop simple tool for determining manifest discrepancies Develop a generic interface concept Define requirements

23. Concept: Manifest Discrepancy Report QUANTITYMANIFESTSHIPDATEGENERATORRECEIVER QUANTITYMANIFESTSHIPDATERECEIVERGENERATOR It’s the differences in manifests and quantities that we are interested in

24. Manifest Discrepancy Summary Report Concept for a report that identifies the magnitude of the problem, if any.

25. Manifest Discrepancy Detail Report RecIDWAD020257945 Data GenIDManifest_NRGenShipmentDTRecShipmentDTSum of GenPoundsSum of RecPounds ORD0007739375718.11/20/200301761.41 82209.12/20/2002024209.35 86058.3/24/2003023819.04 94779.9/15/2003033696.94 99299.12/5/2003036859.46 ORD000773937 Total 0120346.2 WA92140534652290A.10/17/200205020 3028A1/28/2003 23774190 3044L2/13/2003 13720 3097A.4/7/200305660 3099L4/9/2003 25021460 3162A.6/11/2003013860 3216A8/4/2003 3753360 Receiving TSDR Sending GeneratorManifest Number Date Generator Shipped Date Received at Facility Sent Pounds Received Pounds

26. Manifest Discrepancy Detail Report RecIDWAD020257945 Data GenIDManifest_NRGenShipmentDTRecShipmentDTSum of GenPoundsSum of RecPounds ORD0007739375718.11/20/200301761.41 82209.12/20/2002024209.35 86058.3/24/2003023819.04 94779.9/15/2003033696.94 99299.12/5/2003036859.46 ORD000773937 Total 0120346.2 WA92140534652290A.10/17/200205020 3028A1/28/2003 23774190 3044L2/13/2003 13720 3097A.4/7/200305660 3099L4/9/2003 25021460 3162A.6/11/2003013860 3216A8/4/2003 3753360 Missing Data (Yellow Boxes): Lost shipments Data not reported by Generator Missing Pounds ? No data from Generator Extra Pounds: TSD reported 120,346 pounds

27. 3234A8/25/2003 25025640 3254A9/11/2003 33674780 3336A12/2/2003.154630 WA9214053465 Total 2996544690 WAD03852913796281/31/2003 4770.48 2533B.12/9/2003017514 WAD038529137 Total 4770.4822284.48 WAD041337130M00531/17/2002 3423534194 M00551/16/2002 2020720182.8 M01993/7/2002 28348.2528314.3 M02003/7/2002 26686.626654.64 M02013/9/2002 30310.530274.2 M02293/17/20023/18/20022755527522 M02313/13/2002 39658.3241192.93 M03604/30/20025/1/20021837018348 M03735/2/2002 43424170 M04476/1/20026/3/200226177.2526145.9 M05196/21/2002 11695.8411442.48 Prototype: Manifest Discrepancy Report Generator reported 29,965 lbs TSD reported 44,690 pounds Difference: 14,725 pounds Where is the error? Generator, TSDF, or a little of both. Notice this Company

28. N103010/21/2003 21125.521100.2 N112511/7/2003 15031417.8 N119212/5/2003 4008040032 N119312/5/2003 4008040032 N121012/16/2003 21125.521100.2 N125612/23/2003 29548.1529512.76 WAD041337130 Total 933176.38927564.63 Grand Total 967911.861114885.31 Concept: Manifest Discrepancy Report No Missing Manifests Generator reports 933,176 pounds TSDF reports 927,564 pounds Difference: 5,612 pounds 0.6 %

29. Generic Interface Generators of HWTSDR Facilities Receiving HW EXCHANGE NODE Multi-State Hazardous Waste Tracking 1 to 1 Enter Generator EPA Site ID Number All Generators Washington Oregon Enter TSDR EPA Site ID Number All TSDR Facilities Washington Oregon W A D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9O R D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Match to Enter Generator EPA Site ID Number All Generators Washington Oregon Enter TSDR EPA Site ID Number All TSDR Facilities Washington Oregon _______________________ _ O R D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 to Many Enter Generator EPA Site ID Number All Generators Washington Oregon Enter TSDR EPA Site ID Number All TSDR Facilities Washington Oregon _______________________ _ O R D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Many to 1

30. Conclusions Technology is here Methods and techniques are fairly straight forward Opens new business opportunities for state cooperation Possible to create a data flow without a National Data Standard All partners must agree Be willing to rework to make a national standard

31. Follow sound project management principles Recommendation #1

32. Recommendation #2 It has to be Win-Win for everybody

33. Recommendation #3 Know where you are going

34. Recommendation #4 WasteX shows that there are many ways to use the Node capabilities

35. eFiling and the Node TurboWaste.Net ROI (Return On Investment)

36. TurboWaste.Net Impacts the Node

37. Electronic Records Comprise 92% of the Data Reported

38. Companies Reporting Electronically Rises Dramatically TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste Access Version Reporting Deadline 3/1/05

39. TurboWaste.Net is Changing Our Daily Business Practices in One Year 91% 18%

40. How Did We Achieve These Results ? Listening to clients needs Investing in enhancements Client outreach Training Being flexible with deadlines

41. Let’s take TurboWaste.Net for a Spin

42. TurboWaste.Net Welcome to TurboWaste.Net

43. TurboWaste.Net Login

44. TurboWaste.Net User Profile

45. TurboWaste.Net My Sites Welcome to TurboWaste.Net

46. TurboWaste.Net Site Profile

47. TurboWaste.Net Reporting History

48. TurboWaste.Net Site ID Form

49. TurboWaste.Net GM / WR Simple Version

50. TurboWaste.Net GM / WR Expert Version

51. TurboWaste.Net Annual Report Checklist

52. Key Features of TurboWaste.Net - PIN security and encrypted passwords - Administrators can easily add users and change permissions - Administrators / Data Entry Staff responsible for many sites can see all their sites on one screen - Three roles: Administrators ; Data Entry; View Only - Only Administrators can submit data

53. Key Features of TurboWaste.Net - Complete data validation rules in place - Data can be imported, copied from an earlier year, or hand entered - Expert versions of application screens for rapid data entry - Simple versions of screens for drop down menus

54. Key Features of TurboWaste.Net - Data is not available to Ecology for view until it is officially submitted or authorized for view by the client - Annual Reporting can be combined with notification revisions and withdrawals (one Site ID form, multi purpose) - First notification and ownership changes require paper submittals -TurboWaste staff have administrator rights - Ecology staff with “view only” rights on submitted data

55. What our clients are saying about TurboWaste.Net President of EnviroTech…..”I want to complain about your TurboWaste, it’s too easy !” Beth Gilbertson - Kent School District - she has many sites and used it last year. She absolutely loves the new improvements we made this year! I submitted two weeks early. Why? Because the turbowaste program now works so well. It has matured over the years, and your efforts have now really paid off. My hat's off to the turbowaste staff.

56. Submitted in TurboWaste.Net Node Available 91% 18%

57. Credits Debbie Stewart – WA Department of Ecology Miles Neale – WA Department of Ecology Bill Kellum – WA Department of Ecology Mitch West - Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Glen Carr – Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Windsor Solutions Inc. (Lake Oswego, OR)

58. Ed Bentley eben461@ecy.wa.gov 360.407.6466eben461@ecy.wa.gov Dan Kruger dkru461@ecy.wa.gov 360.407.6728dkru461@ecy.wa.gov Thank You