1. EMA2 IDEAS Students

2. Name of Home Institution 1. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India 2 (10%) 2. Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan 6 (29%) 3. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia 6 (29%) 4. Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan 3 (14%) 5. Tribhuvan University, Nepal2 (10%) 6. Other2 (10%)

3. Name of Host Institution 1. Mälardalen University, Sweden 7 (33%) 2. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands 0 (0%) 3. University of Abertay Dundee, United Kingdom 5 (24%) 4. University of Tartu, Estonia2 (10%) 5. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia,Spain 1 (5%) 6. Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain 3 (14%) 7. Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Germany 3 (14%)

4. Duration of Mobility 1. 10 months17 (81%) 2. 20 months3 (14%) 3. Other- Due to unforeseen circumstances 1 (5%)

5. Which Target Group do you belong to? 1. TG 112 (57%) 2. TG 26 (29%) 3. TG 33 (14%)

6. How did you learn about this scholarship programme? 1. Through fellow student6 (29%) 2. Through colleague/ staff member at Home Institution 14 (67%) 3. Through advertisement in magazine/ news paper/ brochure 1 (5%) 4. Through internet/ web site4 (19%) 5. Other1 (5%)

7. The overall information on the IDEAS project web site about application process: 1. Excellent11 (52%) 2. Very satisfied7 (33%) 3. Adequate3 (14%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

8. Information and instructions you received about the final selection and nomination for an IDEAS Scholarship: 1. Excellent13 (62%) 2. Very satisfied5 (24%) 3. Adequate3 (14%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

9. The way the IDEAS coordination team replied and was accessibile for futher information during application and nomination process: 1. Excellent9 (43%) 2. Very satisfied11 (52%) 3. Adequate1 (5%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

10. Availability of information by Home Institution on academic matters (academic strenght of Host Institution; course mapping etc.) 1. Excellent4 (19%) 2. Very satisfied11 (52%) 3. Adequate5 (24%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

11. Availability of information by Home Institution on organisational matters of the IDEAS project: 1. Excellent6 (29%) 2. Very satisfied5 (24%) 3. Adequate9 (43%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

12. Availability of information by Host Institution on academic matters(academic strenght and research fields; teaching and lab facilities, English taught courses, international networking etc.) 1. Excellent8 (38%) 2. Very satisfied10 (48%) 3. Adequate2 (10%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

13. Availability by Host Institution of information, including advising, on organisational matters of the IDEAS project: 1. Excellent10 (48%) 2. Very satisfied6 (29%) 3. Adequate4 (19%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

14. Was the information on admission requirements at the Host Institution clear? 1. Excellent12 (57%) 2. Very satisfied5 (24%) 3. Adequate2 (10%) 4. Not satisfied2 (10%)

15. Style of supervision and academic support at Host Institution: 1. Excellent8 (38%) 2. Very satisfied9 (43%) 3. Adequate2 (10%) 4. Not satisfied2 (10%)

16. Supervisor's support and guidance at Host Institution: 1. Excellent8 (38%) 2. Very satisfied9 (43%) 3. Adequate3 (14%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

17. Supervisor's support and guidance at Home Institution: 1. Excellent10 (48%) 2. Very satisfied6 (29%) 3. Adequate5 (24%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

18. Did you fulfill the objectives you had set out in your Learning Agreement/work plan? 1. Yes9 (43%) 2. No1 (5%) 3. Yes, after some adjustments approved by home- and host institution 11 (52%)

19. Are the ECTS point you gained recognized at your Home Institution? 1. Yes17 (81%) 2. No4 (19%)

20. Will you be awarded an academic degree from your *Host Institution*? 1. Yes8 (38%) 2. No13 (62%)

21. Was the duration of the mobility adequate? 1. Excellent8 (38%) 2. Should be longer8 (38%) 3. Adequate5 (24%) 4. Should be shorter0 (0%)

22. Did you have difficulty in obtaining a VISA or Residence Permit? 1. Yes1 (5%) 2. No20 (95%)

23. The granted Erasmus Mundus scholarship was sufficient to cover the costs of the mobility period: 1. Excellent10 (48%) 2. Very satisfied4 (19%) 3. Adequate6 (29%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

24. Were the Host Institution's arragements regarding bank transfer of scholarship effective? 1. Excellent14 (67%) 2. Very satisfied5 (24%) 3. Adequate2 (10%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

25. Campus facilities at Host Institution: 1. Excellent11 (52%) 2. Very satisfied8 (38%) 3. Adequate1 (5%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

26. Accommodation arranged by Host Institution: 1. Yes14 (67%) 2. No7 (33%)

27. Quality of accommodation: 1. Excellent3 (14%) 2. Very satisfied7 (33%) 3. Adequate10 (48%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

28. Service at Host Institution offered by administrative staff (International Office, Student Services etc.): 1. Excellent13 (62%) 2. Very satisfied7 (33%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

29. Arrangement for your health and liability insurance: 1. Excellent6 (29%) 2. Very satisfied8 (38%) 3. Adequate5 (24%) 4. Not satisfied2 (10%)

30. Social activites at Host Institution: 1. Excellent8 (38%) 2. Very satisfied7 (33%) 3. Adequate5 (24%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

31. Did you take part in language course of the host country language: 1. Yes15 (71%) 2. No6 (29%)

32. Your knowledge of the host country language at end of mobility period: 1. Excellent1 (5%) 2. Very good6 (29%) 3. Adequate12 (57%) 4. Not good2 (10%)

33. Your stay at personal level: 1. Excellent9 (43%) 2. Very satisfied9 (43%) 3. Adequate2 (10%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

34. Your stay at academic level: 1. Excellent8 (38%) 2. Very satisfied10 (48%) 3. Adequate2 (10%) 4. Not satisfied1 (5%)

35. Will this mobility improve your career prospects at Home Institution: 1. Yes20 (95%) 2. No1 (5%)

36. Will this mobility improve your career prospects in Home Country: 1. Yes19 (90%) 2. No2 (10%)

37. Will this mobility improve your career prospects at international level: 1. Yes20 (95%) 2. No1 (5%)

38. Would you recommend the Erasmus Mundus Programme to others? 1. Yes20 (95%) 2. No1 (5%)

39. What is your overall rating of the programme on a scale of one to ten (one is the lowest rating and ten is the best)?: 1. 10 (0%) 2. 21 (5%) 3. 30 (0%) 4. 40 (0%) 5. 50 (0%) 6. 60 (0%) 7. 71 (5%) 8. 86 (29%) 9. 97 (33%) 10. 106 (29%)