1. SESSION III Chair: Mr. V. Suchanek Discussant: Mr. Sergey V. Spiridonov International Workshop of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Working Party on Land Administration Real property cadastre and registration services in the ECE region: the impact of “E-government” reforms Minsk, 8 - 9 June 2010 Address register: creation and uses in the elaboration of “E-government” reforms.

2. Presentations 1  Mr. A.P. Povilan (Belarus): “The creation of address register in the Republic of Belarus” Two stages – till and after 2007 One of key registers, still under constriction Some open problems – source data available only for a part of territory, funding,.. Anticipated results: address portal and register

3. Presentations 2  Mr. Kipras Mensevicius (Lithuania): “Address Register - Lithuanian Experience” One of the key registers, in production Sources: Registers of Real Property, Legal Entities and Population, Address revision project since 1999, revision 2004 Objects: terrotorial units, addresses, streets Provider of universal postal addresses

4. Presentations 3  Mr. Rupert Kugler (Austria): “The Address-solution in the Austrian administration” Demands on addresses: unambiguous, maintained, locatable and creating spatial relations Central address database, corrrectly updated and available via web or applications Advantages for citizens, municipalities, federation, disaster and risk management

5. Presentation 4  Angela Matcov (Moldova):“Cadastral informational resources and their integration under the E-Government project. Experience of the Republic of Moldova Strategic objectives „Electronic Moldov@” Administrative addresses “AddressCad”, land plot 4,4 Mio, Buildings 1.07, Premises 0,43) Start 2006, centralized 2009, Internet, mainly only boundaries of territorial elements

6. Presentations 5  Mr. Antonio Sustic and Ms. Maja Pupacic, (Croatia): “Croatian Address Register – One of the Key Registers in Croatia.” One of key registers Register of Addresses is a part of Register of Territorial Units, central and regional levels, not on- line interconnected, written part digitized Address: town, settlement, street/squer, house number

7. Presentations 6  Jon Atkey (United Kingdom):HM Land Registry's experience in the use of the property address register”  Not a key register, commercial produkt LR Property Gazetter, based on OS Address Point, which utilizes Royal Mail Postcod Address File)  Effects of Credit Crunch on services and employees of HM LR  Overview of E-Services of HM LR

8. Conclusions I  In each country an Address register is considered as one of key registers (exception is UK)  Some Address registers are in production, in some countries under development or semi- production run, nevrtheless all governments are paying big attention to Address Registers  Addresses have to be unambiguous, maintained, locatable and creating spatial relations

9. Conclusions II  Addresses should be available for citizens as well as for public administration bodies  Address registers have a big importance for disaster and risk managent, for emergency services  Mutual updating and compliance withother base registers and cadastre and land registry systems have to be ensured

10. Conclusions III  Legal framework for Addresses Registers is a must, obligatory use by public administration bodies in many countries  Important role of Land Administration Bodies, they are administrators of Address Registers or produce them with geoferencing of address points

11. Conclusions IV  Important role of partnership with municipalities (often play a role in updating) and with other governmental bodies in the framework of base (key) registers  Only on-line interconnection of base registers and their mutual compliance can ensured advantages for citizens and bodies