1. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 How much does the KBA process cost? Estimatives for the Brazilian KBA CI-Brazil

2. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Costs involved Planning process (data gathering, data collection) Creation of protected areas Support of existing protected areas Implementation Maintenance (monitoring, research)

3. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Costs involved Atlantic Forest –Data gathering initiated in 2001 –19 projects supported (US$ 527,000) (CBC, CEPF) –Partial time of 3 employees Cerrado-Pantanal –Data gathering initiated in 2002 –48 projects supported (US$ 687,000) (CBC) –Partial time of 3 employees (until 2004) –Additional employee (from 2005)

4. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Costs involved Amazonia –Data gathering initiated in 2001 –16 projects supported (US$ 473,000) (CBC, CEPF) –Partial time of 2 employees Marine Program –Data gathering initiated on 2002 –13 projects supported (US$ 107,000) (CBC) –Partial time of 2 employees

5. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Summary US$ 1,7 millions (partners) Average of US$ 283 k/year (all regional programs) Activities involved: –Data gathering –Field surveys –Infra-structure for partners –Grants (research and scholarship) –Publications US$ 477 k (salaries) Total: US$ 2.1 millions

6. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Playing with numbers (KBA costs) KBA Regional ProgramUnprotectedProtected Amazon22072 Cerrado-Pantanal17055 Atlantic Forest47877 TOTAL8682041072 80% 20% Private reserve Public reserve Type#CreationImplementationManagementTotal Private5919k15k50k43.749k Public14815k50k100k24.387k Total7.538k16.258k44.340k68.136k

7. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Investments for the next 4 years (only in Brazil) US$ 17,4 millions per year 268 areas per year Total area can be close to 16 millions hectares

8. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Definition of priorities is necessary Combination of irreplaceability and vulnerability Conservation status is not the best surrogate for vulnerability Ex.: same species, same conservation status, different pressures on its habitat in different regions Human pressure on natural ecosystem can indicate its vulnerability

9. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Definition of priorities Vulnerability: –Integration of variables that represents human pressure (roads, fire, human population, population growing) attenuated by conservation opportunities (natural fragments, proximity to existing PA) Irreplaceability: –Metric that combines rarity and richness (summed irreplaceability)

10. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Distance from Roads Fuzzy analysis

11. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Fire frequency 2001 - 2004

12. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Human population Interpolation

13. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Human growth rate Interpolation

14. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Natural vegetation remaining MODIS 13q - 2004

15. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Distance from PA (IUCN I-III) Fuzzy analysis

16. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Distance from PA (IUCN IV) Fuzzy analysis

17. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Distance from PA (IUCN V) Fuzzy analysis

18. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Data Integration Multiple Criteria Evaluation fires 0.4891 roads 0.3285 population 0.0579 Growing rate 0.0579 IUCN I-III 0.2860 Renmants 0.4165 IUCN IV 0.2016 IUCN V 0.0960

19. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Final balance Conservation ‘effort’

20. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 KBA Priorities

21. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Priorities for Cerrado-Pantanal Lines shows average values for each abscissa 21 sites

22. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Targets Penelope ochrogaster Sporophila nigrorufa Sporophila palustris Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus

23. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006

24. Preliminary delineation

25. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 KBA candidate

26. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006 Issues Prioritization is necessary The process must be oriented by efficiency (cost/benefit) Data on species biology/ecology are necessary for most of the taxa Integration of biodiversity data and landscape is necessary. Two steps: –reserve selection (KBA priorization) –reserve design (KBA delineation)

27. KBA meeting, Washington DC, July 2006