Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

11/28/2000 Special thanks to Paul Harris for logo design Engineering Division Design Center Initiative.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "11/28/2000 Special thanks to Paul Harris for logo design Engineering Division Design Center Initiative."— Presentation transcript:

1 11/28/2000 Special thanks to Paul Harris for logo design Engineering Division Design Center Initiative

2 11/28/2000 n Ken Chow n Earl Cornell n Rob Duarte n Lisa Gullo n Lowell Koht n Robin Lafever n Daryl Oshatz n Marty Pollard n Alex Ratti n Tony Vranicar Design Center Advisory Committee

3 11/28/2000 n To improve the effectiveness of Laboratory programs by providing comprehensive engineering services of small scope. We are committed to fast turnaround on all services, including conceptual design, planning & estimating, analysis, programming, prototyping, and fabrication Mission

4 11/28/2000 Objectives n Improve effectiveness of Laboratory programs –“It should be immediately obvious to potential customers that the Design Center exists to enhance their goals.” n Provide focused, short-term engineering expertise to researchers and programs on a timely basis n Apply design effort strategically - where leverage and returns are the greatest

5 11/28/2000 n Conceptual design –Pre-funding feasibility& justification –Fast exploration of alternative concepts through CAD modeling, mockups, rapid-prototypes n Consulting, planning, estimating n Short-term, engineering design projects: –For groups & researchers without need for full-time engineering staff –Mechanical, electrical, software, systems engineering support –Where timeliness is everything n Visible avenue of access to regular Engineering Division expertise Market Needs /Opportunity

6 11/28/2000 n Potential for increasing funding-proposal success rate n Improved effectiveness of ongoing programs by strategic application of engineering expertise n Provides Engineering a tie into future directions at the Lab n Catalyst for interactions between Engineering and PI’s n Vehicle for introducing new design and prototyping methodologies to the Laboratory Benefits

7 11/28/2000 n Parametric solid modeling n Rapid prototyping n Analysis n Paperless manufacturing n Remote collaborative design n Reverse engineering Design & Prototyping Methodologies Benefits (contin.)

8 11/28/2000 n Awareness of the “competition” –Budgets of many PI’s allow for only one or several grad students –Big projects get lion’s share of resource allocation n Develop a competitive advantage: –unique know-how and implementation skills –“faster, better, cheaper” mentality n Create win-win customer relationships Strategy How do we address the needs and opportunities at the Laboratory?

9 11/28/2000 n Define Work areas: –Electrical –Mechanical –Software –Systems Engineering –Cost Estimating –Other? n Decide what to offer and what NOT to offer Strategy Product Overview: Develop an organization and resources matched to the needs and opportunities

10 11/28/2000 n Design Center Group Leader’s “hats”: –Engineer, Project Manager, Sales Person, Resource Manager n Design Center Core Staff (2 engineers, 2 technicians) –Core engineering expertise (mechanical, electrical, software, CAD) n Design Center ‘Floating Staff’ (regular ED staff) –Limited but defined availability; voluntary, dynamic allocation n Partnerships with existing resources –Fabrication shops, outside vendor support n Oversight Committee –Deals with major strategic issues: sets metrics, monitors performance & future direction Strategy: Organization

11 11/28/2000 Engineer Electronics Design Software Design Systems Engineering Instrumentation/ Detector Design Engineer Group Leader/ Engineer Tech/Fabrication Specialist Engineering Associate Core Staff Mechanical Design Fabrication resources Floating Staff Organization

12 11/28/2000 n Early phase Implementation - Phased Approach n Later phase Early phase efforts focus on projects that will enjoy an immediate benefit using skills, processes, and techniques that are already in our inventory. Later phase efforts address strategic goals that require development of new techniques, experimental processes, and advanced methodologies and organizational structures.

13 11/28/2000 n Identify potential clients with an interest and need for products and services we can provide right now. n Assess the project and assemble and ad hoc team with the appropriate skill mix to respond with results that are immediately useful, along with proposals for further work n Formalize team structure and carry out more detailed production in close collaboration with PIs n Keep it short, fast, and useful Implementation - Early Phase

14 11/28/2000 n Potential clients include those with projects in the pre-funding stage, or with obvious but undefined hardware, software and analytical needs, or specific hardware needs but no appropriate resources. n Several have already been identified and approached, and more contacts are being developed Implementation - Early Phase Target Market

15 11/28/2000 n Conceptual Design n Feasibility and justification n Fast exploration of alternate concepts through 2D and 3D CAD models, mockups, and prototypes n Analysis and planning Implementation - Early Phase Limited resources are already in place to provide rapid reaction and ‘High value’ products such as:

16 11/28/2000 Suggested Location: B77 Second Floor, Room. 220 Year-long seismic retrofit effort is due to begin at B77 in December 2000 Where? However...

17 11/28/2000 n Not attractive to engineers (recruitment within division) n Too much too fast - over-commitment n False staffing promises - staff skills do not match projects n Resistance to “floating staff’ concept from home managers n Design overkill - prohibitively expensive solutions Design Center Risk Analysis A. Development Risk

18 11/28/2000 n Kick-off flop - early project successes are critical n Too many promises - expectation overload n Wrong customers n Same “product”, new name (repackaging of existing Division services) Design Center Risk Analysis B. Market Risk

19 11/28/2000 n ‘We want to do your job for you’ - competing with PI’s graduate student staff n Stepping on Engineering Division toes n Design Center as loophole in Engineering Division resource allocation Design Center Risk Analysis C. Competitive Risk - perceptions

20 11/28/2000 n Committee groundwork n Construct Design Center n Purchase of equipment n Staffing/recruitment n Publicity, build contacts n Launch start-up Timeline: Start-up OCTNOVDECJANFEB Year 2000-2001 MAR


Download ppt "11/28/2000 Special thanks to Paul Harris for logo design Engineering Division Design Center Initiative."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google