Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors:

Published bySharyl Scott Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors:"— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors:

2 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 SubmissionSlide 2 Contents Abstract Background TGn Evaluation Methodology New Demand in TGac Evaluation Simulation Scenarios Set-up Conclusion Remarks References Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink March 2009

3 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 3 Abstract The purpose of this submission is to propose an approach to arrive at an acceptable Evaluation Methodology for TGac devices. Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

4 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 4 Background (from 802.11-09/0096r0) 11n developed typical usage models and objective comparison criteria to ensure that all technical solutions met certain standard 11n usage model defined environments, applications, uses cases, usage models, represented by simulation scenarios –There were 9 environments, 21 applications, 39 use cases, 17 usage models, 11 simulation scenarios –Simulations were important in quantifying the performance of a feature –But in the end the task group focused on only three (or four) simulation scenarios –And it was up to those performing simulations to modify the applications to saturate the system 11n comparison criteria document included many categories requiring detailed documentation by the proposal teams –Categories include marketability, backward compatibility and coexistence with legacy devices, performance measurements at the MAC SAP, MAC changes, PHY rates and preambles, channelization, spectral efficiency, PHY performance and changes –In the end the task group focused mainly on throughput simulations –Physical layer impairment scenarios were very useful in adding realism to PHY simulations Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

5 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission TGn Evaluation Methodology (from 802.11-08/1323r0) Application – a source or sink of wireless data that relates to a particular type of user activity. Examples: Streaming video. VOIP. Environment – The type of place a WLAN system is deployed in. Initial examples: home, large office. Use case – A use case is a description of how an end user uses a system that exercises that system’s deployment of WLAN. A use case includes an application in a deployment environment with details regarding the user activity and both sides of the link. Examples: Watching television remote from the cable or set-top box within the home. Talking on the telephone remote from one’s desk at work. Usage Model – A specification of one or more applications and environments from which a simulation scenario can be created once the traffic patterns of the applications are known. Usage models are created to "cover" use cases. Simulation Scenario – A simulation scenario is a description of a usage model that supports simulation. A simulation scenario includes details needed for simulation. Types of details to be included are descriptions that link the usage model to the simulation scenario: environment linked to a channel model, position of the AP (console or ceiling mounted), position of STAs w.r.t. AP, uplink and downlink traffic (# packets, size of packets, interference (number and types of users on the same WLAN channel – adjacent cells, the same cell, number and types of users on alternate channels, BT, baby monitors, GPRS or other systems). A simulation scenario is created from a Usage Model by characterizing the traffic profile of the applications and possibly merging multiple applications together to reduce simulation time. March 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 5

6 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission TGn Evaluation Methodology (from 802.11-08/1323r0) Understanding and defining the application, environment, channel model, use case, usage model and simulation scenario are all necessary to create comparative results from 802.11 TGn proposals. Channel models have been defined in TGn channel modeling documents, with 6 channel models. Each environment will map to a pair of channel models.. Each use case involves the use of one or more applications and is defined for one or more environments. It represents a single type of use of a system using the technology. Each application reflects a source or sink of data. They will eventually be characterized in terms of a traffic profile that allows a simulation of the application to be created. Each usage model contains a representative mixture of applications and channel models designed to adequately cover the important use cases. There is a many to many mapping between use cases and usage models (i.e., the same use case may contribute to multiple usage models and the same usage model may include applications from multiple use cases). There will be a one-to-one mapping between usage models and simulation scenarios. The usage model is a marketing-oriented description of a "reasonable mixture" covering the important use cases. The simulation scenario fills in any technical details necessary to fully define the simulation inputs not present in the usage model. March 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 6

7 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 7 Motivation We need a couple of simulation scenarios to highlight different uses of TGac from TGn It is desirable to accept most of evaluation methodology of TGn with minimal changes Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

8 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 8 New Demand in TGac Evaluation TGac Evaluation shall satisfy these –Compliance to VHTL6 PAR Point-to-point (500Mbps) & point-multipoint link test (1Gbps) –Source and sink –UDP traffic, with infinite offered load –select PHY channel model for each system performance functional requirement –Compliance to VHT-specific Usage models Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

9 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 9 High-Quality Video Service Requirements (from 802.11-09/0161r2) Video CompressionDescription Rate, Mbps Packet Error Rate Jitter, ms Delay, ms Uncompressed 720p(RGB): 1280x720 pixels, 24bits/pixels,60frames/s 13001e-855 1080i(RGB): 1920x1080/2pixels, 24bits/pixels,60frames/s 13001e-8 1080p(YCrCb): 1920x1080 pixels, 12bits/pixels,60frames/s 15001e-8 1080p(RGB): 1920x1080 pixels, 24bits/pixels,60frames/s 30001e-8 Lightly Compressed Motion JPEG2000 H.264 150 70 - 200 1e-7 1e-7 / 8 10 20 Compressed Blu-ray™ 501e-720 HD MPEG2 203e-720 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

10 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 10 Usage Model Mapping to Operating Bands (from 802.11-09/0161r2 and 08/0451r0) Category#Usage model 1. Wireless Display1aDesktop Storage & Display 1b Projection to TV or projector in conf room (lightly compressed video) 1cIn room gaming (lightly compressed video) 1d Streaming from camcorder to display (lightly compressed video) 1eBroadcast TV field pick up 2. Distribution of HDTV2aLightly compressed video streaming around the home 2bCompressed video streaming around home 2cIntra large vehicle (e.g. airplane) applications 2dWireless networking for small office 2eRemote medical assistance 3. Rapid upload/download3aRapid sync-n-go file transfer 3bPicture by picture viewing 3cAirplane docking 3dMovie content download to car 3ePolice / surveillance car upload 4. backhaul4aMulti-media mesh backhaul 4bPoint-to-point backhaul 5. Outdoor campus / auditorium5aVideo demos / tele-presence in auditorium 5bPublic safety mesh 6. Manufacturing floor6aManufacturing floor automation This table is from TGac usage model document (09/0161r2) Usage model mapping to operating bands by 08/0451r0 Red mainly matches to TGac usages. Orange mainly matches to both TGac and TGad usages. Black mainly matches to TGad usages. Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

11 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission Usage Model Mapping to Operating Bands It is seen that TGac usage models are mainly focused on –lightly-compressed video in a residential environment –P2MP compressed video (e.g. blue-ray) in a large office –P2P high-speed backhaul Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 11 March 2009

12 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 12 Usage Model Mapping to Channel Model (for reference) Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

13 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission How to Build TGac Simulation Scenarios It can be seen that theses scenarios can easily be derived –lightly-compressed video with the use of channel B –P2MP compressed video (e.g. blue-ray) with the use of channel D –P2P high-speed backhaul with the use of channel E Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 13 March 2009

14 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission How to Build TGac Simulation Scenarios It is also possible for these scenarios to be derived with minimum modifications to one of conventional TGn simulation scenarios. –Locations of AP and STAs : modification is not needed –High-speed data services supporting high-quality video : only items which need to be modified For example, HDTV, SDTV => light-compressed video (MPEG2000) –Residual services with low data rate such as Internet access, MP3 audio, VoIP and so on : modification is not needed Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 14 March 2009

15 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 15 Example lightly compressed video with the use of channel B –It can be made from scenario #1 of TGn by a few modifications Only data rate related to VHT-specific services : changed –(red in table) SDTV, HDTV services => MPEG2000 Locations and channel type : unchanged Remaining services : unchanged Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

16 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 16 Simulation Scenarios Set-up To check compliance to VHTL6 PAR –Scenario (P2P or P2MP MAC-SAP throughput check) 500Mbps for single VHT-STA and 1Gbps aggregated for multi-VHT-STAs –Scenario (P2MP throughput sharing between VHT and HT) As in TGn scenario #19 (throughput sharing between HT and legacy) To check the system level performance including VHT-specific services –Scenario (Lightly compressed video included in residential) minimal modifications to scenario #1 of TGn –Scenario (P2MP compressed video included in a large office) minimal modifications to scenario #4 of TGn –Others Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

17 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 17 Simulation Scenarios Set-up It is desirable to have a couple of new test scenarios, which can differentiate TGac from TGn –Based on TGac usage models in order to quantify the benefit of new features introduced to the standard in typical usages. It is desirable to minimize the number of simulation scenarios to save time We can also take into consideration ‘scored value’ defined in TGn usage model documents –As a measure of commonality of usage Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

18 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission Comparison Criteria PHY Link Performance –PER vs. SNR curves (all MCS) –All impairments unchanged from TGn System Level –MAC SAP throughput Aggregated and per-flow –Latency (per flow) Maximum delay and jitter Need to define the # of packets that exceed latency requirement –Packet Error Rate Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 18 March 2009

19 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 19 Conclusion Remarks We can derive a number of simulation scenarios from TGn for TGac It is desirable for functional requirements documents to include evaluation methodology for acceleration of task group process. Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

20 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission Straw Poll Do you agree that the approach outlined in the Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology, doc. 802.11- 09/0376r0 is applicable for TGac? –Yes : 20 –No : 0 –Abstain : 1 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink March 2009 Slide 20

21 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Slide 21 References TGac selection procedure document TGac usage model document TGn usage model document TGn comparison criteria document TGn channel model document Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

Download ppt "Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0376r1 Submission March 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors:"

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0810r0 Submission May 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Selection of Key Requirement Elements for Baseline FR-EM Document Date: 2011-05-12.

Doc.: IEEE /0810r0 Submission May 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Selection of Key Requirement Elements for Baseline FR-EM Document Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0161r1 Submission January 22, 2009 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide 1 802.11ac Usage Models Document Date: 2008-11-10 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission January 22, 2009 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide ac Usage Models Document Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: 2014-09 Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0177r0 January 2013 Tetsuya Kawanishi, NICT, et al.Slide 1 Proposal of RoF Extension Link Backhaul for Category 4 Date: 2013-01-23.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0177r0 January 2013 Tetsuya Kawanishi, NICT, et al.Slide 1 Proposal of RoF Extension Link Backhaul for Category 4 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0177r1 March 2013 Tetsuya Kawanishi, NICT, et al.Slide 1 Proposal of RoF Extension Link Backhaul for Category 4 Date: 2013-03-19.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0177r1 March 2013 Tetsuya Kawanishi, NICT, et al.Slide 1 Proposal of RoF Extension Link Backhaul for Category 4 Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Date: 2010-04-30 Fast Session Transfer May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 1 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Date: Fast Session Transfer May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE 11-13-0847-00-0hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:

Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1145r0 Submission December 2012 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 IEEE 802.11aj Usage Models Document Date: 2012-10-23 Authors/contributor:

Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission December 2012 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 IEEE aj Usage Models Document Date: Authors/contributor:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1145r1 Submission November 2012 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 IEEE 802.11aj Usage Models Document Date: 2012-11-12 Author(s)/contributors:

Doc.: IEEE /1145r1 Submission November 2012 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 IEEE aj Usage Models Document Date: Author(s)/contributors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2371r0 Submission September 2007 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Review of TGn’s Usage Models Date: 2007-09-07 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /2371r0 Submission September 2007 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Review of TGn’s Usage Models Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0534r1 May 2013 HanGyu Cho, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Direction and Use Cases for HEW Date: 2013-05-12 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0534r1 May 2013 HanGyu Cho, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Direction and Use Cases for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0528r0 Submission April 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Discussion for 11ah Functional Requirements Date: 2011-04-11 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Submission April 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Discussion for 11ah Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0747r1 Submission May 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Discussion Review of TGah Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology.

Doc.: IEEE /0747r1 Submission May 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Discussion Review of TGah Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology.
Doc.: IEEE 11-13/0554r0 Submission May 2013 Minho Cheong (ETRI)Slide 1 Usage Models for HEW Date: 2013-05-13 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail.

Doc.: IEEE 11-13/0554r0 Submission May 2013 Minho Cheong (ETRI)Slide 1 Usage Models for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
January 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for Wall Penetration Loss Authors: doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r1 Submission.

January 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for Wall Penetration Loss Authors: doc.: IEEE /0078r1 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/702r0 Submission September 2003 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Report of 802.11 High Throughput Usage Model Special Committee.

Doc.: IEEE /702r0 Submission September 2003 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Report of High Throughput Usage Model Special Committee.
Submission Rolf de Vegt, Qualcomm, et al. July 2009 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0849r1 Slide 1 Uplink Intensive Usage Models Date: 2009-07-15 Authors:

Submission Rolf de Vegt, Qualcomm, et al. July 2009 doc.:IEEE /0849r1 Slide 1 Uplink Intensive Usage Models Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0130r0 Submission January 2008 Gal Basson (Wilocity)Slide 1 VHT PAR Direction Date: 2008-01-09 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2008 Gal Basson (Wilocity)Slide 1 VHT PAR Direction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/528r1 Submission May 2004 Conner (Intel Corp.) Slide 1 Defining Usage Models for 802.11s ESS Mesh W. Steven Conner Intel Corp. Contributions.

Doc.: IEEE /528r1 Submission May 2004 Conner (Intel Corp.) Slide 1 Defining Usage Models for s ESS Mesh W. Steven Conner Intel Corp. Contributions.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google