1. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 1 Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC’2003) Technology Panel: Ultra-wideband (UWB), An overview of the IEEE 802.15 Call For Proposals Wednesday, March 19 2003, 11:10 am - 12:30 pm

2. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 2 What’s a UWB? UWB devices operate by employing very narrow or short duration pulses that result in very large or wideband transmission bandwidths. Three types of UWB devices: –Communications and Measurement Systems –Imaging Systems –Vehicular Radar Systems

3. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 3 UWB Panel Summary This technology panel will focus on ultra-wideband (UWB) and the current status from the preceding weeks IEEE 802 Plenary Meeting and the initial round of Physical Layer proposals received on the IEEE 802.15 Call For Proposals; most of which are based on UWB. The attendees will be provided a short overview and summary of the IEEE 802.15 Task Group 3/3a and their UWB studies to date. The Panel will then discuss the UWB proposals, address various UWB schemes, their addressability to the call and/or the emerging regulatory framework, next steps, Project 802.15.3a timeline, etc. Additionally, we will briefly overview the latest worldwide standards and regulatory activities.

4. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 4 UWB Panel Agenda The Technical Panel Chair introduces the panel organizer and moderator (bio). Then the moderator takes over and introduces the panelists (e.g. bios). Panelists make their presentations, 5-10 min: –Julius Knapp – USA regulatory process and current status –Bob Huang – European regulatory process and current status –Ryuji Kohno – Japanese regulatory process and current status, Academia, and CRL 802.15.3a Alt PHY Proposal –Jeffrey Foerester – Intel 802.15.3a Alt PHY Proposal –John McCorkle – XSI 802.15.3a Alt PHY Proposal Then panel discussion.

5. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 5 IEEE and UWB The IEEE 802.15 was approved in Mar99. The WG on: –Mar00 sponsored a UWB tutorial –Nov02 approved a Study Group SG3a –Nov01-Nov02 studied Alt PHYs UWB, etc. –Dec02: CFP released for candidate Alt PHYs PAR approved for P802.15.3a or TG3a –Jan02 held first Task Group 3a meeting –3Feb02 31 CFIs received –3Mar03 24 CFPs contributed –10-14Mar03 22 Alt PHYs presented

6. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 6 IEEE: An Overview IEEE Established in 1884 (AIEE & IRE) IEEE Dec02 Membership was 382,483; 66% USA & 33% Non-USA IEEE produces 30 percent of the world's published literature in electrical engineering, computers and control technology, IEEE holds annually more than 300 major conferences and IEEE has more than 900 active standards with 700 under development.

7. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 7 Imperative Principles of the IEEE Standards Process Due Process –Rules and Procedures Consensus –Near unanimity Openness –Everyone has Access to Process –Individuals, World-wide Balance –Balloting group must include developers and users Right to Appeal –Both procedural and technical anytime during the process

8. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 8 Overview of the IEEE Standards Development Process

9. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 9 IEEE 802® Local and Metropolitan Area Network Standards Committee Accredited by ANSI, Sponsored by IEEE Computer Society –Ethernet, Token Ring, Wireless, Cable Modem Standards –Bridging, VLAN, Security Upper Layer Standards Meets three times per year (1000 individuals, 15% non-US) Develops equivalent IEC/ISO JTC 1 standards –JTC 1 series of equivalent standards are known as ISO 8802-nnn IEEE 802 web site at http://ieee802.org/ Chair: Paul Nikolich (p.nikolich@ieee.org) PHONE: +1 781 334 6524

10. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 10 IEEE-SA and IEEE 802

11. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 11 IEEE 802® Organization Sponsor Executive Committee (SEC) HIBERNATION 802.2 LLC (Dave Carlson) 802.4 Token Bus (Paul Eastman) 802.7 Broadband TAG (P Nikolich) 802.10 Security (Ken Alonge) DISBANDED 802.8 Fiber Optic TAG (C. Benson) 802.14 CATV (Robert Russell) 802.5 Token Ring (Bob Love*) 802.6 DQDB (Jim Mollenauer) 802.9 ISLAN (D. Vaman) 802.12 Demand Priority (Pat Thaler) = Wireless 802®

12. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 12 IEEE 802® Family 802.10 SECURITY *802 OVERVIEW & ARCHITECTURE 802.1 MANAGEMENT 802.2 LOGICAL LINK CONTROL 802.1 BRIDGING 802.11™ MAC 802.11 PHY 802.12™ MAC 802.12 PHY 802.15™ MAC 802.15 PHY 802.16™ MAC 802.16 PHY 802.3™ MAC 802.3 PHY 802.4™ MAC 802.4 PHY 802.5™ MAC 802.5 PHY 802.6™ MAC 802.6 PHY DATA LINK LAYER PHY LAYER Source: IEEE Std P802.15.1 D0.7.2

13. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 13 802.15 WPANs 802.15.1 (Standard) –Bluetooth™-WPAN derivative published 14Jun02 Study Group 802.15.1a –Studying BSIG v1.2 specification edits and a potential amendment to the IEEE 802.15.1™-2002. P802.15.2 (Recommended Practice) –WLAN & WPAN Coexistence, MAC & PHY Modeling in Sponsor Ballot P802.15.3 (Standard) –WPAN-HR, High Rate 11-55 Mb/s in Sponsor Ballot P802.15.3a (Standard) –Alt PHY amendment to the 802.15.3 MAC –WPAN-HR, High Rate >110 Mb/s, P802.15.4 (Standard) –WPAN-LR, Low Rate 2-200 Kb/s in Sponsor Ballot Publicity Committee –Provide MARCOM for above

14. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 14 802.15 WG has created 3 MACs and 5 PHYs, TG3a is the 6 th PHY Physical Layer Medium Access Control Sublayer Logical Link Control Sublayer { { { = Draft in process or complete = Draft not defined e.g., CFP, etc.

15. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 15 802.15.3 SAPs The 802.15.3 standard supports convergence sublayers as shown above (Annex A, D13); 15.3a will address these.

16. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 16 Draft 802.15.3a Timeline, based on PAR Nov02 Session #21 –CFP released Jan03 Session #22 –Formalization of the Task Group, approve TG Slate of Officers, SG docs, etc. Mar03 Session #23 –Proposals should be heard, panel session, begin feedback, etc. May03 Session #24 –If too many proposal for one session, this should be the overflow. –We should spend part of this session discussing proposals presented, answering technical questions/concerns (i.e. put the diehard engineers in a room and let them verbally duke it out). –Spend time on conference calls discussing proposals to let everyone get comfortable (before and after this session). Jul03 Session #25 –Voting must occur here - 1st opportunity for automatic quorum after presentations Sep03 Session #26 –Start drafting process - proposals for draft improvements should be entertained at this time (i.e. now that we know the realm of the game, let the games begin) Nov03 Session #27 –Initial draft ready for WG ballot. Jan04 Session #28 –First Ballot complete, second ballot kicked off. Mar04 Session #29 –Expected Date of Submission for Initial Sponsor Ballot. Jul04 Session #31 –Submittal to RevCom. Sep04 Session #32 –Approval by IEEE Standards Board. Nov04 Session #33 Mar05 Session #35 Jul05 Session #37 Nov05 Session #39

17. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 17 Draft 802.15.3a Timeline, revised estimate Nov02 Session #21 –CFP released 3Dec02. Jan03 Session #22 –Formalization of the Task Group, approved TG Slate of Officers, SG docs, etc. Mar03 Session #23 –22 Proposals heard, begin feedback, etc. May03 Session #24 –We should spend part of this session discussing proposals presented, answering technical questions/concerns (i.e. put the diehard engineers in a room and let them verbally duke it out). –Spend time on conference calls discussing proposals to let everyone get comfortable (before and after this session). Jul03 Session #25 –Voting must occur here - 1st opportunity for automatic quorum after presentations Sep03 Session #26 –Start drafting process - proposals for draft improvements should be entertained at this time (i.e. now that we know the realm of the game, let the games begin) Nov03 Session #27 Mar04 Session #29 –Initial draft ready for WG ballot. May04 Session #30 –First Ballot complete, second ballot kicked off. Jul04 Session #31 Nov04 Session #33 –Draft ready for IEEE sponsor ballot. Mar05 Session #35 Jul05 Session #37 –Approval by IEEE Standards Board Nov05 Session #39 Note: This is my personal estimate. The next two (2) slides Show this graphically.

18. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 18 TG3a Milestone Planning 2004 JJASONDJFMAMJJ D JFMAM The current milestone planning suggests 8mo for the CFP, 7mo for the TG draft editing and review, 9mo for WG Ballot Phase, and 9mo for Sponsor Ballot Phase. Pub 2H ‘05. A SON You are here 2003 CFP D PAR Editing WG Ballot Phase (9mo) Sponsor Ballot Phase (9mo)

19. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 19 2006 JJASONDJFMAMJJ D JFMAM A SON 2005 D Sponsor Ballot Phase (9mo) Editing StB Jun05Published Sep05 TG3a Milestone Planning (cont.)

20. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 20 Q&A

21. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 21 More Info WCNC UWB Panel Presentations: –http://ieee802.org/15/pub/2003/Mar03/Misc/ –http://ieee802.org/15/pub/Tutorials.html IEEE 802.15 WG for WPANs –http://ieee802.org/15/ IEEE 802.15.3a Proposals* –http://ieee802.org/15/pub/TG3a_CFP.html –http://ieee802.org/15/pub/2003/Mar03/ *Note: The initial 31 CFI Respondents were assigned doc numbers -03/093-154.

22. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 22 Panelist Contact Info Ian Gifford – Panel Moderator and IEEE 802.15 Vice Chair –igifford@xtremespectrum.com Bob Huang, Senior Technical Manager, Sony Electronics –Robert.Huang@am.sony.com Jeff Foerster, Wireless Researcher Intel Labs –jeffrey.r.foerster@intel.com Julius Knapp, Deputy Chief of the OET FCC –jknapp@fcc.gov Ryuji Kohno, Yokohama National University, Japan & Director, UWB (Ultra Wideband) Technology Institute –kohno@ynu.ac.jp and kohno@crl.go.jp John McCorkle, CTO and Co-Founder, XtremeSpectrum, Inc. –john@xtremespectrum.com

23. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 23 Backup Slides

24. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 24 How to Drive an 802 Standard Requires study group chair to drive consensus Requires editor to write standard Requires committed individuals/organizations Requires technical leaders to resolve issues Requires consortium to drive market awareness RESULT –Standard will be rock solid –Standard will be maintainable –Market will be ready

25. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 25 OSI Reference Model wireless application presentation session transport network data link physical application presentation session transport network data link physical application presentation session transport network data link physical TCP connection

26. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 26 OSI to 802 LAN/MAN Model application presentation session transport network data link physical

27. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 27 Consumer Wireless - Portable, Unlicensed, Accessible 10K (b/sec.) 100K 1M 10M BOM. Cost (Dollars - Y2000) 10 100 IrDA 1.0 IrDA 1.1 ISM Spread Spectrum w/ Access Point Cellular PCS Satellite Multimedia System Wireless LANs Bluetooth 1,000 Home RF Wireless Modems Data Rates ? HomeRF Multimedia - TBD AIR W/o Access point AirPort Source: Walt Davis, Motorola, Mar00 IEEE 802.15 Plenary Meeting http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2000/Mar00/00086r1P802-15_HRSG-Wireless-Multimedia-Application-Motorola.ppt Data Rate Vs. Cost

28. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 28 10K (b/sec.) 100K 1M 10M Distance (feet) 100 1,000 10,000’s IrDA 1.0 IrDA 1.1 ISM Spread Spectrum WLAN w/beam Cellular LAN w/ Patch Antenna PCS Satellite Multimedia System Wireless LANs WLAN 11 Mbps Modulation Bluetooth Data Rates Wireless Modems HomeRF 16 Mbps IrDA (Apple/Lucent “AirPort”) Source: Walt Davis, Motorola, Mar00 IEEE 802.15 Plenary Meeting http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2000/Mar00/00086r1P802-15_HRSG-Wireless-Multimedia-Application-Motorola.ppt Data Rate Vs. Distance

29. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 29 Major opportunities and convergence scenario Source: Marc de Courville, Motorola, May00 IEEE 802.15 Plenary Meeting http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2000/Mar00/00128r0P802-15_TG3-OFDM-HIPERPAN.ppt

30. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 30 Data Rates in the Wireless Space Data Rate (Mbps) Range ZigBee WiMEDIA WPAN WLAN WMAN (Fixed) Cellular (Mobile) WiFi IEEE 802.16 2G 0.010.11101001000 Bluetooth 3G Source: John Barr, Motorola, Nov02 IEEE 802.15 Plenary Meeting http://ieee802.org//15/pub/2002/Nov02/02460r0P802-15_TG3-WiMedia-Presentation-to-PC.ppt

31. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 31 ‘Alt PHY’ Data Rates and Spatial Capacity Streaming Throughput (Mbps) Spatial Capacity (log scale) 0.11101001000 Bluetooth WiFi (11b) Max throughput Aggregate throughput in the home WiFi (11a) WiMEDIA 15.3 PHY Source: John Barr, Motorola, Nov02 IEEE 802.15 Plenary Meeting http://ieee802.org//15/pub/2002/Nov02/02460r0P802-15_TG3-WiMedia-Presentation-to-PC.ppt

32. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 32 Scope This project will define an alternative PHY clause for a higher data rate amendment to standard 802.15.3.

33. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 33 Purpose The intent of this project is to provide a standard for a low complexity, low cost, low power consumption alternate PHY for 802.15.3 (comparable to the goals for 802.15.3). The data rate will be high enough, 110 Mb/s or more (see 18a), to satisfy an evolutionary set of consumer multi-media industry needs for WPAN communications. The project will address the requirements to support multimedia data types in multiple compliant co- located systems and also coexistence (18b).

34. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 34 CFI respondents NOLNAMEFNAMEAFFILIATION 1ShorGadiWisair 2RobertsRickXtremeSpectrum 3BrabenacChuckIntel 4ParkMichaelSamsung Electronics 5AllenJimAppairent Technologies 6RasorGreggMotorola 7RasorGreggMotorola 8EllisJasonGeneral Atomics 9AielloRobertoDiscrete Time 10MolischAndreasMitsubishi 11MolischAndreasMitsubishi 12McLaughlinMichaelParthusCeva 13KellyJoyTime Domain 14BoehlkeKennethFocus Enhancements 15MoSamPanasonic

35. 19Mar03Ian Gifford 35 CFI respondents (cont.) NOLNAMEFNAMEAFFILIATION 16KerryStuartPhilips 17KwonDo-HoonSamsung Electronics 18TewfikAhmed H.University of Minnesota 19ChinFrancoisInstitute for Infocomm Research 20CheahJonFemto Devices, Inc. (Transilica Inc.) 21FisherReedOki Semiconductor 22RobertsGlynSTMicrolectronics 23TanahashiMikeTRDA/Taiyo Yuden 24FujitaEtsumiSony 25LakkisIsmailWideband Access Inc. 26RypinskiChanLace, Inc. 27SanthoffJohnPulse-LINK 28KareevUriPulsicom 29BatraAnujTexas Instruments 30ZhangHonggangUWB (Ultra Wideband) Technology Institute 31KaraoguzJeyhanBroadcom