Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mining and the development of local and national economies CommDev’s 19 June 2006, Washington D.C.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mining and the development of local and national economies CommDev’s 19 June 2006, Washington D.C."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mining and the development of local and national economies CommDev’s 19 June 2006, Washington D.C.

2 Importance to society and industry Economic performance of mineral dependent economies Resource Endowment Initiative Community Development Toolkit The way forward Photo by Malu Cabellos, Guarango Cine y Video (Guarango Film and Video, Peru) Photo by Teri Pengilley. Taken from cover of: Karl Blanchet, Regina Keith and Peter Shackleton (2006)

3 Importance to society Geological resources are non-renewable natural capital Risks from social, safety and environmental impacts Risks to national economies and public institutions “Many of the world’s poorest countries possess significant reserves of oil and other natural resources. Yet numerous academic studies show that, … (such countries) … score lower on the UN’s Human Development Index, exhibit greater corruption, have a greater probability of conflict in any five year period, have higher percentages of their populations in poverty, dedicate a greater share of government spending to military spending, and are more authoritarian than those with more diverse sources of wealth.” [Palley, 2003]

4 Broad socio-economic success: also important for business Case for access to land Security for long-term investments Satisfying regulators and financiers Photo “Pupils at Loharano School, Madagascar, supported by QIT Minerals, Madagascar” Image taken from rear cover of December 2004 issue no. 72 of Rio Tinto’s ‘Review’ magazine

5 Economic performance Socio-economic outcomes are mixed Source: World Bank

6 Economic performance Better PerformersWeaker Performers Better Performers Generally Better Performers Weaker Performers with relatively better performance in a few economic (E) and social indicators (S) Clearly Poor Performers Chile Botswana Malaysia Tunisia Ghana Mexico Colombia Guinea Jamaica Mali Morocco Mozambique Namibia Senegal South Africa (E) Tanzania (E) Guyana (E) Mauretania (E) Gabon (E + S) Peru (S) Suriname (S) Togo (S) Jordan (S) Zimbabwe Bolivia Central African Republic Congo Liberia Niger PNG Philippines Sierra Leone Zambia

7 Mining investment should be a catalyst “Mining provides opportunities. If a country fails to take advantage of them, the fault lies with the government and other entities that decide how…the mineral wealth is used” Graham Davis

8 Resource Endowment Initiative Probe reasons for success or failure? How have specific problems been addressed? – Dutch disease – Predatory behaviour – Poor policy and institutional development – Narrow benefits Key research questions – What are the critical success factors? – What practical steps can industry and other stakeholders take?

9 Resource Endowment work programme

10 Assuring quality and objectivity  Members of the Independent Advisory Group: Georg Kell (Executive Head, United Nations Global Compact Office) Pedro Pablo Kuczynski (Minister of Economy and Finance, Peru) (until mid 2005) Mamadou Lamine Loum (Independent consultant and former Prime Minister of Senegal) Warwick J McKibbin (Executive Director, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis and Professor of International Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University; Member, Board of the Reserve Bank of Australia) Hon. Felix Mutati (Deputy Minister of Finance and National Planning, Republic of Zambia) Jane Nelson (Director, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University and Director, Business Strategy, International Business Leaders Forum)  Initiative Partners  Consulting team

11 Case study findings: Ghana Introduction of new minerals code

12 Case study findings: Tanzania Introduction of new minerals code

13 Case study findings: Peru

14 Case study findings: Chile

15 Case study findings: poverty alleviation Ghana: 12% reduction (52% to 40%) Peru and Tanzania: no material change nationally Chile: see graph below

16 Overall findings Economic growth occurs under right conditions Sound macro-economic and legal framework is essential Necessary governance standard’s “OK” – provided correct targets – not “good” Substantial poverty alleviation can also occur Governance quality has improved

17 Governance in Peru and Chile

18 Community Development Toolkit Objective: tools for community development around mining and metals processing operations Local focus Broad audience: government, industry and civil society Covers full life cycle Planning and design ClosureOperationsExplorationConstruction

19 Toolkit contents 17 practical “how to” tools Cover: – Assessment of community conditions – Planning of programmes and activities – Relationships: establishing good stakeholder relationships – Programme management – Monitoring and evaluation

20 The way forward Positive or negative outcomes can result from mineral resource investment Sound macro-economic and legal structure needed to stimulate investment Socio-economic outcome – governance dependent, key factors: – Effective and co-ordinated use of taxes etc. – Not low tax rate – Focus on capacity strengthening across government – Programme focus on key issues – Strengthening local supply chain Collaboration is essential, individual actions will not work

21 www.icmm.com ICMM 19 Stratford Place London W1C 1BQ United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7290 4920 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7290 4921 Email: info@icmm.com


Download ppt "Mining and the development of local and national economies CommDev’s 19 June 2006, Washington D.C."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google