Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Passive Distortion Compensation for Package Level Interconnect Chung-Kuan Cheng UC San Diego Dongsheng Ma & Janet Wang Univ. of Arizona.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Passive Distortion Compensation for Package Level Interconnect Chung-Kuan Cheng UC San Diego Dongsheng Ma & Janet Wang Univ. of Arizona."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Passive Distortion Compensation for Package Level Interconnect Chung-Kuan Cheng UC San Diego Dongsheng Ma & Janet Wang Univ. of Arizona

2 2 Outline 1.Motivation 2.Review of High-Speed Serial Links 3.Passive Distortion Compensation 1.Theory 2.Implementation 3.Simulation Results 4.Power Management and System Integration 5.Research Direction

3 3 1. Motivation: ITRS Bandwidth Projection Abundant on-chip bandwidth Off-chip bandwidth is the bottleneck Many chip are I/O limited Technology (nm) Normalized unit to 90nm node Courtesy of Hamid Hatamkhani et al., DAC ‘06

4 4 2. Review of High-Speed Serial Links TechniquesOn-ChipOff-Chip Pre-emphasis and equalization √√ Clocked Discharging (M. Horowitz, ISVLSI’03) √ Frequency Modulation (S. Wong, JSSC ’03; Jose ISVLSI ’05) √√ CDMA on wireline (Jongsun Kim et al.) √√ Non-linear Transmission Line (E. Hajimiri JSSC’05, E.C. Kan CICC ’05) √ Resistive Termination (Tsuchiya et al., EPEP; M. Flynn ICCAD ’05) √√

5 5 3. Passive Distortion Compensation Typical RLC Transmission Line Distortionless Transmission Line Frequency dependent phase velocity (speed) and attenuation Intentionally make leakage conductance satisfy R/G=L/C Frequency response becomes flat from DC mode to Giga Hz

6 6 3.1 Theory: Telegrapher’s Equations Telegrapher’s equations Propagation Constant Wave Propagation and correspond to attenuation and phase velocity. Both are frequency dependent in general. Characteristic Impedance

7 7 3.1 Theory: Distortionless Lines Distortionless transmission line If Both attenuation and phase velocity become frequency independent

8 8 3.1 Theory: Differential Case Common Mode – Current flowing in the same direction Differential Mode – Current flowing in the opposite direction Shunt between each line to groundShunt between the two lines

9 9 3.2 Implementation Evenly add shunt resistors between the signal line and the ground Non-ideality Ideal AssumptionIn PracticeImplication Homogeneous and distributive line Discrete shunts What’s the optimal spacing? Are the shunt resistors realizable? Frequency independent RLGC Frequency dependent RLGC What’s the optimal frequency for the matching?

10 10 3.2 Implementation: MCM trace MCM On-chip Length Series Resistance Frequency dependency of line parameters Large Small ~10 cm ~ 10 mm 1 Ω/mm 1 Ω/μm MCM trace vs. On-chip interconnect Operation regionRLC RC

11 11 3.2 Implementation: A MCM Stripline Case Control the signal line thickness to minimize skin effect (cost vs. distortion) Assume LCP dielectric Geometry based on IBM high-end AS/400 system

12 12 3.3 Simulation: Methodology Transient simulation in Hspice Each transmission line segment is modeled by W- element using frequency-dependent tabular model Discrete resistors Used CZ2D tool from IBM for RLGC extraction Part of IBM EIP (Electrical Interconnect & Packaging) suite. Fast and accurate Ensures causality of transient simulation

13 13 3.3 Simulation: RLGC vs. Frequency R C Match at DC Boost up low frequency traveling speed Balance low frequency attenuation and high frequency attenuation Z0 = 78 Ω, delay = 57.78 ps/cm R 1MHz =11.07 Ω/cm, L 1MHz =5.52e-3 μH/cm, C 1MHz =0.74 pF/cm R shunt =L 1MHz /R 1MHz C 1MHz = 669.5 Ω/cm L G

14 14 3.3 Simulation: Shunt Resistor Spacing Number of shunt resistors = N Resistors are implemented with embedded carbon paste film Spacing depends on the target data rate

15 15 3.3 Attenuation W8μm/t2μm/b20μm

16 16 3.3 Phase Velocity W8μm/t2μm/b20μm

17 17 3.3 Simulation: Pulse Response less severe ISI effect DC saturation voltage determined by the resistor ladder

18 18 3.3 Jitter and Eye opening for 2um case 10 cm20 cm Jitter (ps)Eye opening (volt)Jitter (ns)Eye opening (volt) 1 shunt/1 cm 1 5.5650.425639.3690.095785 Terminated with Z 0 2 5.02280.3744913.870.14595 Terminated with Rdc 3 5.81830.3390612.1170.090432 Open end22.50.51> 70< 0.14 W8μm/t2μm/b20μm 1.Each shunt resistor is 669.5 ohm 2.Z 0 =78 ohm 3.For 10cm line, R dc = 66.9 ohm; for 20 cm line, R dc =33.5 ohm

19 19 3.3 Jitter and Eye opening for 4.5um case 10 cm20 cm Jitter (ps)Eye opening (volt)Jitter (ns)Eye opening (volt) 1 shunt/1 cm 1 22.830.52523.340.238 Terminated with Z 0 2 7.37640.4891637.3270.21423 Terminated with Rdc 3 12.0260.5711437.4430.20064 Open endUnrecognizable W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm 1.Each shunt resistor is 1232 ohm 2.Z 0 =71.1 ohm 3.For 10cm line, R dc = 123.2 ohm; for 20 cm line, R dc =61.6 ohm

20 20 3.3 Simulation: Eye Diagrams With 10 shunts (each = 669.5) Without shunt resistors Jitter = 22.5 ps Eye opening = 0.51 V Jitter = 5.57 ps Eye opening = 0.426 V W8μm/t2μm/b20μm/L10cm 1000 bit PRBS at 10Gbps W-element + tabular RLGC model in HSpice Clear eye opening Reduced amplitude

21 21 3.3 Best Eye Diagram for 2um thick case W8μm/t2μm/b20μm/L10cm, 10 distributed resistors Jitter & eye opening v.s. shunt value Best case when each shunt is 500 ohm Jitter = 4.63 ps Eye opening = 0.35645 V Jitter Eye opening

22 22 Best eye diagram when only terminator is used, 2um thick case Jitter Eye opening W8μm/t2μm/b20μm/L10cm, terminator only Jitter & eye opening v.s. R_term Best case when terminator 90 ohm Jitter = 4.97 ps Eye opening = 0.40647 V

23 23 W8μm/t2μm/b20μm/L20cm, 20 distributed resistors Jitter & eye opening v.s. shunt value Best case when each shunt is 600 ohm Jitter = 9.816 ps Eye opening = 0.08379 V Jitter Eye opening

24 24 W8μm/t2μm/b20μm/L20cm, terminator only Jitter & eye opening v.s. R_termBest case when terminator 40 ohm Jitter = 11.95 ps Eye opening = 0.10111 V Jitter Eye opening

25 25 3.3 Eye Diagram for 4.5um thick case when matched at DC Sleepy Eye Jitter = 22.8 ps eye opening = 0.525 V W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm/L10cm Open ended10 shunts matched at DC

26 26 3.3 Best Eye Diagram for the 4.5um thick case W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm/L10cm, 10 distributed resistors Jitter & eye opening v.s. shunt value Best case when each shunt is 500 ohm Jitter = 11.97 ps Eye opening = 0.44036 V Jitter Eye opening

27 27 W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm/L10cm, terminator only Jitter & eye opening v.s. R_term Best case when the terminator is 80 ohm Jitter = 7.18 ps Eye opening = 0.51672 V Jitter Eye opening

28 28 W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm/L20cm, 20 distributed resistors Jitter Eye opening Jitter & eye opening v.s. shunt value Best case when each shunt is 800 ohm Jitter = 21.762 ps Eye opening = 0.18288 V

29 29 W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm/L20cm, terminator only Jitter Eye opening Jitter & eye opening v.s. R_term Best case when the terminator is 110 ohm Jitter = 37.595 ps Eye opening = 0.24859 V

30 30 3.3 Eye Diagram for the MCM trace Jitter = 38.834 ps Eye opening = 0.21418 Jitter = 23.24 ps eye opening = 0.238 V W8μm/t4.5μm/b20μm/L20cm Terminated with Z 0 20 shunts matched at DC

31 31 4. Adaptive Power Management (APM) The distortionless signaling simplifies the interface circuitry. However, the twice heavier attenuation due to passive compensation calls for adaptive power management; With adaptive power management, we adaptively regulate the power supply of the transmitter according to attenuation; The regulated supply voltage guarantees the speed of transmission while keeping the minimal power overhead and well-controlled bit-error rate.

32 32 4. APM Preliminary Results

33 33 4. APM Controller

34 34 4. System Integration The reduction of the jitter leaves larger design margin for interface circuit design; To enable an effective and accurate communication, the operation of transmitter and receiver must be well synchronized. This requires accurate clock positioning and phase locking; Synergic method will be taken to achieve mutual compensation and joint leverage on signal accuracy, attenuation and system power.

35 35 5. Research Direction Develop analysis models for the technology Eye diagram analysis via step responses Power consumption Optimize technologies Chip carrier and board technologies Redistribution Physical dimensions Shunts, terminators Prototype fabrication & measurement More applications: clock trees, buses Incorporate transmitter/receiver design

36 36 Remark Distortion Compensation: Source termination: Impedance Receiver termination: Voltage Clamp, Matched Z, Optimized Z. Distributed shunts Combination of above techniques Packaging Current Products: Improve signal quality based on current fabrication technologies. Future Products: Devise the optimal combination.

37 37 The End Thank you!


Download ppt "1 Passive Distortion Compensation for Package Level Interconnect Chung-Kuan Cheng UC San Diego Dongsheng Ma & Janet Wang Univ. of Arizona."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google